Psalm 16

Scripture: Psalm 16

Video Link: https://youtu.be/AxHjOormnnM

Structure:

  • Introduction
  • Loyalty
  • Intimacy
  • Fullness
  • Eternity
  • Conclusion

Introduction:

Good morning everyone.

Last Sunday we played some Scrabble. This week I thought we could have a game of Snowman. Snowman is a spelling game usually played with kids, so I hope there are some children listening today.

Kids, the idea is for you to correctly spell the word I’m thinking of before I can draw a snowman. Throughout this message I will give you a number of clues. The first clue is that this word has four letters.

Last week we heard about Psalm 46. Today our focus is Psalm 16. This is a psalm of David. From verse 1 we read…   

Protect me, O God, for in you I take refuge. I say to the Lord, “You are my Lord; I have no good apart from you.” As for the holy ones in the land, they are the noble, in whom is all my delight. Those who choose another god multiply their sorrows; their drink offerings of blood I will not pour out or take their names upon my lips.

The Lord is my chosen portion and my cup; you hold my lot. The boundary lines have fallen for me in pleasant places; I have a goodly heritage. I bless the Lord who gives me counsel; in the night also my heart instructs me. I keep the Lord always before me; because he is at my right hand, I shall not be moved.

Therefore, my heart is glad and my soul rejoices; my body also rests secure. For you do not give me up to Sheol, nor let your holy one see decay. You show me the path of life. In your presence there is fullness of joy; in your right hand are pleasures forevermore.

May the Spirit of Jesus illuminate God’s word for us.

There are close to 30 four letter words in this psalm. Words like hand and glad and Lord and pour and so on. Maybe the word I’m thinking of can be found in this Psalm. Maybe not.

Loyalty:

The psalms are sometimes described as Israel’s hymn book. They are essentially a collection of song lyrics or poems from ancient Israel.   

Let me read you some other song lyrics from a different time and place in history…

Somewhere, somehow somebody must have kicked you around some. Tell me why you want to lay there, revel in your abandon. Honey, it don’t make no difference to me, baby, everybody’s had to fight to be free. You see you don’t have to live like a refugee (don’t have to live like a refugee)

Is there anyone in your bubble who knows who wrote the lyrics to this song?

That’s right, Tom Petty.  

A refugee is someone who has been forced to leave their country because of war, persecution or natural disaster. A refugee is someone who has lost their land, their home, their worldly possessions and anything else that would normally give a sense of security and stability.

People can also become emotional refugees. Perhaps they have had to flee their home because of an abusive relationship with a partner or a parent. Sometimes too children can feel like refugees when their parents separate, even if the separation is relatively amicable.

Essentially a refugee has lost their place of refuge, they have lost their security, and are looking for a safe haven.

I don’t think Tom Petty wrote this song for political refugees who have had to flee their own country. I imagine it was written more for emotional refugees, people who have suffered and been displaced when domestic relationships have gone bad.

That line where he says, ‘Tell me why you want to lay there, revel in your abandon’, is brilliant. It’s like he’s saying, ‘You may have a had a hard time but you’ve got a choice. You don’t have to think of yourself as a victim. You don’t have to give in to self-pity. Find refuge. Choose to re-connect. Start again. Be a survivor’

Perhaps Tom Petty never meant that much by his lyrics but they still speak.

In verses 1-2 of Psalm 16, David writes: Protect me, O God, for in you I take refuge. I say to the Lord, “You are my Lord; I have no good apart from you.”

David knew what it was to be a refugee. As a young man David was driven away from home and into the wilderness, because king Saul wanted to kill him. And then, as an older man, David became a refugee once more, when he was forced to flee from his son Absalom.

But despite being a refugee, despite being kicked around some, David does not revel in his abandon. He does not give in to self-pity. Rather he takes refuge in God Almighty. David makes God his home. (‘Home’ is a four letter word. Is that the word I’m thinking of?) When God is your home you can never be displaced. There is no greater security than the Lord.

That phrase, where David says, ‘I have no good apart from you’, is both a statement of David’s loyalty to God and at the same time a description of David’s reality.

As a refugee David has lost a great deal. He is living rough in the wilderness, he is separated from his family. He is having to survive by his wits. David knows full well that the Lord is his only hope.

In verses 3-4 David gives further evidence of his loyalty to the Lord God when he says: As for the holy ones in the land, they are the noble, in whom is all my delight. Those who choose another god multiply their sorrows; their drink offerings of blood I will not pour out or take their names upon my lips.

Most of the expert Bible commentators say the original Hebrew of these verses is quite difficult to untangle. But essentially, David is saying he is loyal to the God of Israel. He has put all his eggs in one basket. He doesn’t put a bob both ways. He doesn’t worship the Lord God alongside other pagan gods.

Like Jerry Maguire, who had only one client, David serves only one God, Yahweh.

This is quite remarkable really. If anyone had a reason to revel in his abandon or to go chasing after other gods, it was David. Despite all he has lost David does not blame God. As a refugee (as someone hungry for security) David presses into the Lord even more deeply.

How are you getting on with spelling the mystery word I’m thinking of? If you have chosen the letter L, then you are on the right track. Our word starts with L.

Fullness:

Churches around the country are empty this Sunday. We might feel quite sad for what we have lost because of Covid. 

But maybe there is another way of looking at it. We, in New Zealand, are in the fortunate position of having a choice. We could see the apparent emptiness of lockdown as an opportunity to make room for God.  

Sometimes the more stuff we have in our lives, the less room we have for God.

Sometimes the more capable we are, the more pressure we find ourselves under to meet everyone’s demands and the less time we have for God.

Sometimes the more freedom we have, the harder it is for us to make a good choice.

Sometimes the more entertainment we consume, the more difficult it is to be still and think.

Do you see where I’m going with this? Sometimes less is more. (‘Less’. That’s a four letter word that begins with L. Is that the word I’m thinking of?)

When I say, ‘less is more’, I mean, perhaps the emptiness has something to offer. It seems to me that David’s loyalty to God was formed in the womb of emptiness. He sought refuge in God because he had no other good thing.

Sometimes less is more.  Before we can fill our lungs with fresh air we must first empty our lungs of the stale air. I’m not saying I like lockdown. I look forward to a time when we can gather safely in level 1 or better still level none.

Maybe though, this time of lockdown is an opportunity to expel some stale air out of our lives. Maybe it is an opportunity to make room for the fresh oxygen of God’s Spirit.

A few years ago I asked my spiritual director to pray for me. I don’t remember the words he said exactly but I do remember his posture. He opened his hands, so they were empty, with the palms facing upward, like he was about to receive something.

He may not have meant too much by that gesture but it still speaks to me now. Before we can take God’s hand we must first let go of whatever else we are holding on to.

Here’s a quote for you for Fathers’ day (not sure where it comes from)…

A truly rich man is one whose children run into his arms when his hands are empty.

It may sound a bit sentimental, but that doesn’t make it any less true.

For someone who has lost so much, David still sees the cup of his life as full. Not full in a busy, hurried and pressured kind of way. But full in a pleasant, roomy, chilled out kind of way.

In verses 5 & 6 of Psalm 16 we read about the quality of David’s fullness…  

The Lord is my chosen portion and my cup; you hold my lot. The boundary lines have fallen for me in pleasant places; I have a goodly heritage.

In ancient Israel, during the time of Joshua, land in Canaan was allocated to tribes and clans and families according to sacred lot. The land allotted to your clan then stayed in the family and was passed down from generation to generation. This is what verse 6 is referring to when it says the boundary lines have fallen for me in pleasant places.

(‘Land’ is another four letter word beginning with L, by the way.)

The curious thing is that David was probably writing this as a refugee. David had been emptied of material possessions when he was driven off his land. He was living in a cave in the wilderness. How is it then that he can say: The boundary lines have fallen for me in pleasant places.

Well, David sees his loss and consequent emptiness as an opportunity for receiving the fullness of God himself. David may not have land but the Lord is his portion. David could not have a more ‘goodly heritage’ than the Lord. The Lord Himself is David’s inheritance. God Almighty is David’s land, the ground of his being.

In reading verse 6 I am reminded of Frank & Marjorie Duncan. Psalm 16:6 is their family motto. Frank was the minister of Tawa Baptist some years ago and before that he and Marjorie were missionaries in China during the 1940’s.

They served in Honan province during the famine of 1942 to 1944. Before the famine ended around 80,000 people, out of a population of 500,000 in that district, had died. In a material sense it was a time of great emptiness. But there was also a fullness of compassion in the relief camp that Marjorie and Frank ran.

Sometime later Frank & Marjorie became refugees as they were forced to flee China for their lives. How is it then, after coming through all of that, the Duncan family were able to say: The lines are fallen unto me in pleasant places; yea, I have a goodly heritage. (KJV)

Well, I cannot pretend to know what was in Frank & Marjorie’s heart, but I expect it had to do with verse 5: The Lord is my chosen portion and my cup; you hold my lot.

The kind of fullness that God gives is brought out more explicitly in verse 11:

…In your presence there is fullness of joy; in your right hand are pleasures forevermore.

The Hebrew word translated as fullness comes from the same root as ‘satisfied’.

The sort of fullness in view here is not the uncomfortable fullness one might feel after eating too much. Rather, it is the replete-ness of having eaten only what you need.

Nor is it the feeling of frustration, like when you’ve had a guts full of something. Rather, it is the feeling of joy and wonder that accompanies a new experience.   

As Derek Kidner observes, the joys and pleasures (of verse 11) are presented as wholly satisfying and endlessly varied, for they are found both in who God is and what he gives. ‘[David], the refugee of verse 1 finds himself an heir and his inheritance beyond all imagining and all exploring.’ [1]   

Time for another clue. If the letter ‘f’ is one of the letters you guessed, then well done; ‘f’ goes in the middle of our four letter word. We still need two more letters to spell the whole word though. 

Intimacy:

Verses 7 & 8 of Psalm 16 read…

I bless the Lord who gives me counsel; in the night also my heart instructs me.

I keep the Lord always before me; because he is at my right hand, I shall not be moved.

These verses speak of God’s nearness to David. David may be separated from his family and loved ones, but he is close to God. Close enough, in fact, to hear God’s counsel (his wisdom and advice) intimately.   

What does David mean when he says, my heart instructs me? Normally, in the Old Testament, the heart refers to a person’s mind; their thought life. However, the Hebrew word, translated as heart in verse 7, is more literally kidneys.

I suppose the English translators chose the word heart because the poetry of, my kidneys instruct me, would be lost on most modern readers. Probably David is using the Hebrew word kidneys as a metaphor for his conscience. Just as kidneys act as a filter for our blood, so too the conscience acts as a filter for our soul. So the thought is: in the night also my conscience instructs me.    

If that seems like overthinking it, then the reference to ‘kidneys’ might just be an ancient way of saying, ‘I have a gut feeling about this’, like an instinct or an intuition. You just know.

In any case, David’s intimacy with God is clear. God is guiding David in his inner being. And the interesting thing is that this intuitive / gut guidance happens at night, when David is quiet and still.

We read in the gospels how Jesus often went off by himself, very early in the morning, to pray. We are not told exactly what happened in these times of prayer but I expect it was a time of intimacy between Father and Son. A time when God spoke counsel to Jesus, in the stillness.

How is your devotional life at the moment? Are you able to carve out time to be still and listen to God? Stillness makes room for God.

I’m getting close to finishing the snowman. Better give you another clue. Did any of you guess the letter ‘i’? I imagine some of you did. The ‘i’ comes second. So far then we have ‘L-i-f ’. That narrows it down quite a bit. It is likely to be one of two words. Kids, if you are still listening, can you think what those two words might be?

Eternity:

Psalm 16 finishes on a note of joy at the prospect of unbroken fellowship with God. From verse 9 we read…

Therefore, my heart is glad and my soul rejoices; my body also rests secure. For you do not give me up to Sheol, nor let your holy one see decay. You show me the path of life. In your presence there is fullness of joy; in your right hand are pleasures forevermore.

In a nutshell these verses are alluding to eternal life. Eternal life doesn’t just mean existing forever. Eternal life describes a quality of relationship with God, characterised by joy and intimacy and pleasure.

Sheol, in ancient Hebrew thought, is the realm of the dead. The people of king David’s time didn’t really think of the after-life in terms of heaven and hell. Sheol wasn’t paradise, nor was it torture. It was more of a neutral space; a place of shadows.    

Notice how David talks about his heart, soul and body, in verse 9. This is a way of describing one’s whole self, physical and spiritual. David rests secure (he has no fear for the future) because he is confident that nothing, not even death, can separate him from the love of God.

The idea of eternal life, unbroken blissful fellowship with God, is not new to us because we have the gospel of Jesus. But it was a pretty progressive idea 3000 years ago when David wrote his psalm.

2000 years ago the apostles Peter & Paul both applied the closing verses of Psalm 16 to Jesus and his resurrection. In Acts 2, on the day of Pentecost, Peter made the comment…

Seeing what was to come, [David] spoke of the resurrection of the Messiah, that he was not abandoned to the realm of the dead, nor did his body see decay. God has raised this Jesus to life, and we are all witnesses of it.

It is through faith in Jesus that we also will share in resurrection to eternal life. Therefore, we do not need to be afraid in this life. If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised Jesus from the dead, you will be saved.  

Conclusion:

It is time now for the great reveal. The word I was thinking of was life. Well done to all those who guessed it. You made it just in time before I put the arms on the snowman.

Psalm 16 shows us what true life is. We tend to think of life as mere physical existence. So if someone is still breathing we say they are alive. But in the thought world of the Bible, life is more than breathing. Life is close friendship with God. 

Some of you may have noticed how the four main points of today’s message make an acrostic of the word life: Loyalty, Intimacy, Fullness and Eternity, spells life.

Loyalty to God. Intimacy with God. Fullness of joy in God’s presence and eternity with God, beyond death. This is what Psalm 16 means by life.

Whatever situation you find yourself in today, may the life of the risen Christ be real for you. God bless.

Questions for discussion or reflection:

What stands out for you in reading this Scripture and/or in listening to the sermon? Why do you think this stood out to you?

  • Have you ever felt like a refugee? (E.g. displaced, homeless, afraid for your life, in need of refuge…) What were the circumstances? How did God help you in that situation?
  • How is your experience of this lockdown? How might we redeem this time? How might we make more room for God in our lives, both during this lockdown and after?
  • Why was David (who knew what it was to be a refugee) able to say, ‘The boundary lines have fallen for me in pleasant places. I have a goodly heritage’?
  • How is your devotional life at the moment? How does God speak counsel to you? Are you able to carve out time to be still and listen to God?
  • Discuss / reflect on the various ways Psalm 16 points to Jesus.  
  • What is ‘life’ in the thought world of the Bible? How is this different from a contemporary understanding of life? 

Outtakes

It is no accident that the Israelite refugees in exile in Babylon said (in Lamentations 3:24), The Lord is my portion, therefore I will hope in him. The Jewish exiles had lost everything. But as painful as their amputation was, it made room for hope in God.


[1] Refer Derek Kidner’s (Tyndale) commentary on the Psalms, page 103

Giving

Scripture: Luke 16:1-13

Title: Giving

Key Points:

  • Giving opens doors and facilitates movement
  • Giving creates security by strengthening relationships

Introduction:

Last summer we went to Kapiti Island for a day

–         Kapiti has a lagoon on its northern edge

–         Although it is right beside the sea the lagoon is completely closed in – no water flows in from the sea and no water flows out

–         Apparently this happened naturally with time and weather

–         Local Maori say the lagoon was a burial place for those who had fought and died on Kapiti in wars of centuries past

–         No one drinks the water, nor fishes from it, nor even swims in it

–         The water is dark and brackish (a mix of fresh water and salt water), not really inviting

–         Movement supports life – the Kapiti lagoon is a place of death, not just because of its history but because it has no movement – nothing flows in and nothing flows out

Today we continue our series on well-being and care of the soul, using the acronym: HEALING.

–         Each letter represents a word which, when properly applied, is life giving to the human soul…

–         Hope Energy Appreciation Lament Inter-dependence Nurture & Giving

–         Last week we looked at nurture – this morning our focus is giving

Giving is good for our soul in a number of ways

–         Giving supports life by opening doors and facilitating movement

–         If the lagoon on Kapiti had an opening the brackish water inside could be released and changed regularly and it would become a place of life again

Or to change metaphors, giving is like CRC – it loosens things that have seized

–         Or giving is like engine oil – it allows the motor to run freely without overheating

–         Or giving is like kiwi fruit – it moves your bowel and clears out the waste

–         Or giving is like picking beans – the more you pick the bigger your crop

Giving can include sharing money and resources, being generous in our attitude toward others, giving time to listen and serve, giving people the benefit of the doubt and forgiving others.

Luke 16:1-13

To help us explore this idea of giving our message today focuses on Luke 16, verses 1-13. Taken as a whole Luke 16 is about the use of wealth

–         As I’ve already mentioned there is more to giving than sharing money, nevertheless Luke 16 sets out some helpful principles relating to giving

–         From verse 1 we read…

Jesus told his disciples: “There was a rich man whose manager was accused of wasting his possessions. So he called him in and asked him, ‘What is this I hear about you? Give an account of your management, because you cannot be manager any longer.’

“The manager said to himself, ‘What shall I do now? My master is taking away my job. I’m not strong enough to dig, and I’m ashamed to beg— I know what I’ll do so that, when I lose my job here, people will welcome me into their houses.’

“So he called in each one of his master’s debtors. He asked the first, ‘How much do you owe my master?’

“‘Nine hundred gallons of olive oil,’ he replied.

“The manager told him, ‘Take your bill, sit down quickly, and make it four hundred and fifty.’

“Then he asked the second, ‘And how much do you owe?’

“‘A thousand bushels of wheat,’ he replied.

“He told him, ‘Take your bill and make it eight hundred.’

“The master commended the dishonest manager because he had acted shrewdly. For the people of this world are more shrewd in dealing with their own kind than are the people of the light. I tell you, use worldly wealth to gain friends for yourselves, so that when it is gone, you will be welcomed into eternal dwellings. “Whoever can be trusted with very little can also be trusted with much, and whoever is dishonest with very little will also be dishonest with much. So if you have not been trustworthy in handling worldly wealth, who will trust you with true riches? And if you have not been trustworthy with someone else’s property, who will give you property of your own? “No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money.”

May the Spirit of Jesus illuminate this Scripture for us

 

Our reading today begins with Jesus telling his disciples the parable of the shrewd manager (or the unjust steward)

–         Two things this parable shows us about giving…

–         Giving opens doors and facilitates movement

–         And giving creates security by strengthening relationships

 

The parable of the Shrewd Manager assumes a scenario in which a rich landowner leases his land to farmers who pay rent by giving him a portion of their harvest [1]

The rich man learns that his servant has been wasting his goods so he calls the manager in, fires him on the spot and orders him to hand over the books

–         This may seem a bit harsh to us but it was actually quite gracious in the context

–         In Jesus’ day a manager could have been imprisoned or sold as a slave with his family in order to recoup the rich man’s losses

–         But the rich man lets the manager go free

Interestingly the manager does not argue with his master – he doesn’t try to justify himself

–         The manager knows his master is right and there is no point in arguing, so his thoughts turn to his future – how will he provide for himself?

To his credit the manager harbours no illusions about himself – he knows he couldn’t make it as a labourer or a beggar so he devises a plan so cunning you could pin a tail on it and call it a weasel (as Black Adder might say to Baldric)

–         The manager’s plan is to call his master’s debtors in one by one and forgive a large portion of each of their debts

–         ‘…Then when my job is gone here, I shall have friends who will welcome me in their homes.’

–         Giving opens doors and facilitates movement

–         Giving also creates security by strengthening relationships

 

The manager called the master’s debtors to him (one at a time) and he reduced their debts significantly

–         900 gallons of olive oil becomes 450

–         1000 bushels of wheat becomes 800

–         These represent significant sums of money

–         450 gallons of olive oil was worth about a year and half’s wages

Giving creates security by strengthening relationships

–         Generally speaking, the greater the gift the stronger the relationship, or at least the stronger the obligation

Let me demonstrate what I mean [Hold up a single piece of paper]

–         Imagine that this piece of paper represents the relationship between two people

–         As you can see the relationship isn’t very strong or deep just yet – it could easily be ripped in half – and that’s because not much has been given or shared, perhaps just 1 gallon of olive oil

[Hold up a phone book]

–         Here we have a more robust relationship – one in which 450 gallons of olive oil has been given or shared

–         As you can see this relationship is much stronger

The point is: by forgiving such large amounts of debt the manager opened doors and created security for himself by strengthening relationships

On the one hand the debtors don’t realise the manager has already been given the sack and is no longer authorised to write off their debt

–         So publicly the debtors would be able to say ‘I had no idea the manager had been fired – I thought he was authorised to make the reductions’

–         But on the other hand they might also be thinking, ‘this is all a little bit too good to be true, I have a feeling the manager is going to want his cut’

–         So privately the debtors might be expecting to split some of their savings with the manager afterwards

The manager very shrewdly gets the debtors to write the reduction in their own hand – in this way the debtors cannot contest the amounts owed or get out of their shady deal with the manager

–         It also shows the master that the debtors are aware of the reductions making it a lot more difficult for the master to change the figures back without losing face

As Kenneth Bailey observes, by making these reductions public knowledge the manager has made his master look like a generous hero in the eyes of the whole community

–         If the master were to increase the debts again he would then look bad in the eyes of the community

–         The master chooses to show extravagant grace to the manager once again and does not contest the reductions

–         This act of grace for the manager is also an act of grace for the whole community – everyone wins at the master’s expense

The parable concludes with the master praising his servant (the manager) – not for being dishonest but rather for being clever & brave

–         The manager has essentially risked everything on a belief that his master will act graciously, not treating him as he deserves

–         If the master had not been gracious the plan would have failed and the manager would have been thrown in prison or sold as a slave

–         The master’s generosity points to God’s generosity in forgiving us

 

In verse 9 Jesus interprets his own parable saying…

  • I tell you, use worldly wealth to gain friends for yourselves, so that when it is gone, you will be welcomed into eternal dwellings.

–         In other words, giving opens doors and strengthens relationships, not just in this life but in eternity

–         Jesus means for people to be smart and use the money or wealth they have in constructive ways – to help others, especially the poor

–         In the same way that the manager had to prepare for his future because he was about to lose his job, so too we need to think about our eternal future

–         This life won’t last forever and when it ends we can’t take our money with us – but what does carry over into eternity is our relationships, because relationships have to do with spirit

Money may have some value in this life but it will have no value in the next life

–         Good relationships have value both in this life and the next

–         If you know the value of your dollar will soon be worthless then the smart thing to do is invest your money in something that will hold its value before the dollar drops – Good relationships hold their value forever

–         So it makes sense to use our money to help others and to strengthen good relationships now, while we still can

 

Luke 16 contains a second parable – of the rich man and Lazarus

–         If the parable of the shrewd manager teaches us about giving and a good use for money, then the parable of the rich man and Lazarus teaches us about withholding and a foolish use of money

–         The rich man used his wealth to indulge himself while neglecting to help Lazarus the poor man

–         When they both died the tables were turned and Lazarus went to be with Abraham, while the door to paradise was shut to the rich man

–         Giving opens doors and strengthens relationships in this life and the next

–         Withholding things (whether that’s withholding money or the truth or love) locks doors and dissolves relationships

–         The security of having right relationships is far better than the security offered by money

 

In some ways (although not in every way) the master in Jesus’ parable is a bit like God and we are a bit like the servant or the manager

–         Hopefully we aren’t dishonest like the manager but, either way, we are not the owner of the wealth – God is the owner and we are the stewards

–         Jesus says as much in verses 10-13…

–         If you have not been trustworthy with someone else’s property, who will give you property of your own

–         In other words: what we have in our possession in this life; our car, our house, our furniture, the money in our bank account, our job, our time – it’s not really ours – it belongs to God

–         But we do have considerable freedom about how we use it – whether to serve God’s purpose by helping others or not

–         If we use what God has entrusted us with faithfully, to serve His purpose, then we will be trusted with more in eternity

So if the money we have belongs to God and we need to use it to serve his purpose then what does good stewardship look like?

–         Should we be living on the smell of an oily rag and blindly giving away as much as we can to charitable causes?

–         Well, no – I don’t think so

–         God is into justice and mercy – so our spending needs to be fair & kind

–         Yes, we should give some money to charitable causes that are in line with God’s purpose but not at the expense of justice

–         Justice is better than charity

For example, it is better to buy fair trade goods and pay a little more than it is to buy something cheap that has been made by slave labour, even if you plan to give the savings to World Vision or the SPCA

–         We shouldn’t give to charities as a substitute for paying a fair price

–         In global terms we (in NZ) are relatively wealthy – we need to use our wealth in solidarity with the poor, not in ways that oppress them

 

Take the example of pokey machines – while the profits might be distributed to community charities, these same profits often come at the expense of the poor

–         If pokey machines are contributing to the problem then it would be better not to have them in the first place

–         No amount of charity can compensate for injustice

–         If you have a dead carcass rotting in a stream, making the water undrinkable, you don’t leave the carcass there and try to purify the water with chemicals – no, you remove the carcass

 

Another Godly use of money is taking care of your family

–         God puts us in families for a reason – to take care of each other

–         If you hold the purse strings then be fair to your family with how you spend your income – make sure they are warm, dry, well fed and educated before spending on yourself or sending money overseas

–         And, if at all possible, try to have a job that allows you time with your kids – because your time is more valuable to them than your money

I could go on but hopefully you get the point: good stewardship doesn’t mean amassing large amounts of wealth

–         Nor does it mean giving all our money away thoughtlessly or carelessly

–         Good stewardship means using what God has given us to help others in ways that are just, merciful and life-giving

–         John Stott was wise and strategic in his giving – the money he made from the books he wrote went to paying for quality theological training for men & women in poor countries. He believed that would do more long term good, for more people, than anything else

 

In his book Lost Connections Johann Hari tells the following true story of the effects of giving [2]

In the middle of the 1970’s a group of Canadian officials chose a small town, called Dauphin, for an economic experiment

–         Most of the people living in Dauphin were farmers growing a crop called canola

–         The 17000 people of the town worked as hard as they could but were still struggling

–         When the canola crop was good everyone did well but when the canola crop was bad, everyone suffered – consequently there was insecurity because people were anxious about having enough to live on

 

The government officials wondered what would happen if they gave everyone in Dauphin a guaranteed universal basic income with no strings attached

–         I guess it was a bit like our national superannuation except for everyone, not just those over 65

–         This income wouldn’t be means tested like our working for families tax credit – every household simply got paid $19,000 US per year (in today’s terms) – which is over $28,000 NZ dollars

–         By itself this wouldn’t be enough to live on but it would make life easier

–         Sounds a little bit like communism but it wasn’t because people were still free to choose the work they did, still free to worship God and still free to earn more if they wanted to, without penalty

–         This experiment lasted for a while until a new government was elected in Canada and stopped it

 

It wasn’t until years later that a woman, called Evelyn, dug up the data and interviewed those who had taken part to learn the outcome of the experiment

–         Evelyn went through the medical records and found there were fewer people showing up at the doctors with depression & anxiety at that time

–         Why? Because the guaranteed basic income removed the rotting carcass of financial stress in people’s everyday lives – it provided security

 

We might expect people to misuse the money or at least accumulate as much as they could, but quite the opposite happened in Dauphin

–         Giving people basic security actually opened doors for them and made positive change possible

–         People chose to work a bit less and spend more time with their kids

–         And this time was quality time because the parents were less stressed and able to be present with their kids, which meant family life was better

–         Students stayed at school longer and learned more – not only that but some adults went back to school to improve their lot in life

–         Others who felt trapped in a job they hated, just to pay the bills, now had the means to leave that job and do something they enjoyed more

 

People didn’t waste the extra money on booze and cigarettes

–         No – they proved to be good stewards and used the money in wise and creative ways to strengthen their relationships and secure a better future for themselves and their families

 

The same sort of experiment has been done in other places too with the same sort of results

–         I’m not an economist so I don’t know how this would work on a larger scale (like, how would you pay for it and what would it do to inflation?) but I expect there would be significant improvements to people’s health & wellbeing as well as a reduction in crime, therefore saving money over the long term

–         More importantly though people would enjoy the true wealth of better quality lives and relationships

 

This idea of stewardship – giving people resources and trusting them to make good decisions with it, is similar to God’s approach with us

–         Of course with God we will have to give account one day

 

Conclusion:

Our reading from Luke this morning finishes with that well known verse…

  • “No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money.”

 Giving (in whatever form it takes) saves us from the tyranny of self

  • – The tighter we hold onto money the tighter it holds onto us
  • – Financial riches are a cruel master, as is poverty
  • – God is a far kinder, more gracious master
  • – When we release what God has given us, to serve his purpose, we affirm that God is in charge and we find release for ourselves – we open up the lagoon of our brackish heart for God to bring refreshment & life

 

Giving well is good for our soul

–         Giving sets us free – it opens doors in this life and the next

–         Giving facilitates movement and movement supports life

–         Giving also creates security and a better future through stronger relationships

 

Questions for discussion or reflection

1.)    What stands out for you in reading this Scripture and/or in listening to the sermon?

2.)    What are some of the ways in which we can give?

3.)    Why does the master commend the shrewd manager?

–         How are we to be like the shrewd manager?

–         How are we to not be like the shrewd manager?

4.)    What does the parable of the shrewd manager teach us about giving?

–         What does it teach us about the value of money and relationships respectively, in the light of eternity?

5.)    What might good stewardship look like?

–         What do we mean when we say, ‘justice is better than charity’?

–         Give some examples of a good use of money – a use that serves God’s purpose

6.)    What would you do if you had a guaranteed basic income (no strings attached) like the people of Dauphin?

7.)    What is your experience of wealth &/or poverty?

–         What is your experience of God as master of your life?

–         How does giving set us free from the tyranny of self?

 

[1] I have drawn mainly on Kenneth Bailey’s interpretation of this parable from his book ‘Jesus through Middle Eastern Eyes’, pages 332-342. Other commentators take a different view.

[2] Johann Hari. ‘Lost Connections’, pages 245-249.