Tawa Baptist

Kevin

Scripture: Luke 17:11-19

  • Introduction
  • Kevin
  • Trevor
  • Jesus
  • Conclusion

Introduction

Sometimes we go through life unaware. Unaware of ourselves. Unaware of the burdens our neighbours carry. Unaware of the way our actions affect others, for good or ill. Unaware of what is just around the corner. No one thinks it will happen to them.

Kevin

Hi. My full name is a bit of a mouthful so you can just call me Kevin for short. It will make it easier for you. I know what you’re thinking, Will and I look exactly the same. The likeness is uncanny I know. But I’m actually slightly more handsome than Will (especially for my age) and better at preaching. Don’t say anything to Will though. He can be a bit sensitive about that sort of stuff.

Anyway, Will asked me to speak to you this morning because it is world leprosy day. I was born around 2000 years ago and lived in what you know as the middle east – on a hill in central Palestine, in the West Bank territory, to be more precise.

My father sold figs and other fruit in the local market. He was a kind man, probably too kind for his own good in his line of work. I loved being with him and he was happy for me to tag along.

Working in the markets as we did, bartering and haggling, you learned to be aware. Aware of who was around you and who was missing. Aware of regulars and tourists. Aware of small kindnesses and large injustices. Aware of those willing to pay a fair price and those who would rob you if they could. Aware of changes in mood and atmosphere – like the way people stiffened and closed up around occupation soldiers and then relaxed when the threat was gone. Always we were aware of honour and shame.

It’s not like that today. The people I see here, in your world, often seem unaware – plugged in and tuned out. It’s a self-preservation thing I suppose. You are saturated with information. Distractions are constant. I don’t blame you for using a filter. But it’s not good for you to be too closed off. You still need to let some light in.

My dad was aware. He let the light in. At the end of each day, when we were packing up and walking home he would always find something to be thankful for. Even on the seemingly bad days when we didn’t sell much fruit he still found something positive to focus on. Years later I came to realise it was his thankful attitude that funded his kindness.   

None of us know what’s around the corner. I certainly didn’t. My dad’s heart stopped when I was 14, which meant I became responsible for feeding the family. Just my mum and my younger sister. I carried on selling figs and I tried to be thankful but it wasn’t the same without dad. I made enough to get by but, financially, we sailed pretty close to the wind, like almost everyone else.

Things were okay for a couple of years and then I became aware of patches of discoloured skin on my body. There was a numbness in my finger-tips too, which was weird. I ignored it for a while. No one thinks it will happen to them.

Besides, I couldn’t afford to have anything wrong with me. I had to provide for my family. As the patches spread I did my best to cover them up. No one wants to buy fruit off someone who looks sick. But eventually I was found out. It was impossible for me to hide the loss of my eyebrows and eyelashes.  

One of my customers, the mother of a girl I quite liked actually, saw me fumble some fruit. It’s hard to hold onto things when you can’t feel them. She looked at my hand first, then at my missing eyebrows, before drawing a breath in horror and walking off quickly. The shame and humiliation of it was overwhelming.

Shortly afterwards I was aware of a change in the atmosphere. She must have told her neighbours because it wasn’t long before people in the market were whispering to each other and looking at me with disgust and fear, like I was an occupation soldier.    

Nothing is as dangerous as a crowd with an idea in mind. I packed up my fruit stand and headed home as quickly as I could. I didn’t get far though. The first blow was soft and hit me in the back of the head. Never saw it coming. Just a fig. The next blow was a lot harder though and hit me in the chest. A rock. Things were about to get ugly.  

It wasn’t supposed to happen like this. In Leviticus the law laid down protocols for dealing with people with skin diseases. I should be examined by a priest, in private. The priest was supposed to make the decision about whether I was clean or unclean and even then there was a seven-day self-isolation period. If my skin disease had not improved in a week then I was to leave.

But the crowd had taken matters into their own hands. They didn’t want my kind around. So I ran as hard as I could and I didn’t look back.

With tears streaming down my face, I wondered if I would ever see my mother and sister again. I couldn’t go home because that would put their lives in danger. What would happen to them now I wasn’t there to provide? There was no government welfare system.

People often aren’t aware of the burdens their neighbours carry or how their own actions affect others.

That night I took shelter under a mustard tree, hungry, cold and exhausted. My feet were bleeding but I couldn’t feel any pain. Not physical pain anyway. There was another kind of pain though, like an emptiness in my heart, that I was all too aware of. Some of you might know it as loneliness. Despite the emptiness I couldn’t find room to be thankful.

I never thought this would happen to me. And by ‘this’ I mean leprosy. We always think it will happen to someone else. But why shouldn’t it happen to me? It happens to someone around the world almost every hour. I wasn’t so special.

There is a randomness to life, it seems, that is as cruel as it is blind. Why should one person be born rich and another poor? Why should one man die in battle and another live? Why should some women lose their husband and their son while others never grieve? God is moral. I know that to be true. But the world we live in is not. We do not get what we deserve. We get what we get.    

I waited for sleep to overcome me, hoping I would never wake up. But God, who is intimately aware of the thoughts of the human heart, sent his angel to watch over me.

Trevor

We often think of angels as perfect heavenly beings, all clothed in purest white, with beautiful faces, fresh breath and soft wings. Yea, nah. The angel God assigned to me was a real fright to look at. His clothes were stained and ripped, his breath smelled like rotten fish and where his wings should have been there was just an unsightly hump.

But he was perfect. Had God sent someone clean and healthy and well-groomed I would have only hated myself all the more for being none of those things. Instead God sent me someone beautifully imperfect, someone I could feel comfortable with.

Trevor, whose real name you could never pronounce, may have been hard to look at but he was the kindest person I have ever met. In that way, at least, he reminded me of my dad. Trevor took care of me. He bandaged my feet, gave me food to eat and water to drink, introduced me to others like us and taught me how to survive.       

Not just physical survival but mental survival. Each of us walks a tight rope in our mind you see. Trevor helped me to keep my balance – to avoid self-pity, resentment, bitterness and other forms of self-harm. By his own example Trevor showed me how to keep a sense of humour, maintain healthy boundaries and take care of myself without disrespecting those around me.  

And he understood the Scriptures in a way that was fresh and simple and profound all at the same time. Ironically, Trevor used to be a Jewish priest. That’s especially ironic because I am a Samaritan, from the West Bank. I suppose in today’s terms that’s like saying I’m a Palestinian.

Traditionally Jews and Samaritans have a long history of tit for tat reprisals and enmity. We hate each other or at least we are expected to. But Trevor didn’t get that email. He loved everyone. It hardly matters when you have leprosy anyway. Leprosy effectively puts Jews & Samaritans, rich & poor, black & white in the same category – unclean, outcast, to be avoided at all costs.     

Trevor explained to me that being unclean was not a moral thing. It was a ceremonial thing. We were not bad people or at least not worse than anyone else. Having leprosy was not a punishment from God. We may have been unlucky but our misfortune did not make us any less loved by God.

Likewise, although we were not able to participate in rituals of community worship, we could still praise God. Trevor taught me that God doesn’t just live in a temple. He fills the whole earth. God is not impressed by aesthetics or how something looks on the outside. True worship comes from a thankful heart, he said. This reminded me of my dad. 

Not everyone in our community was as positive or enlightened as Trevor though. Living with leprosy, being estranged from your family, not knowing where your next meal is coming from, all that sort of stuff is hard. It’s next level hard. And when life is tough it tends to create callouses on the heart. Thankfulness is too easily swallowed up by cynicism.  

But Trevor’s heart never lost its feeling. I think this was because Trevor was aware. Aware of himself and aware of his neighbours. He understood the way his actions affected others. I suppose you might call that empathy or compassion. No one knows what is just around the corner though, not even Trevor.

He died, suddenly one night. Just went to sleep and didn’t wake up. Like my father I guess he was too good for this world. Death happened all the time in our community but that didn’t make Trevor’s passing any easier.

After Trevor’s death I almost lost my balance and fell off that tight rope in my mind. Somehow I managed to hold on by my fingertips. I wasn’t strong or wise or inspirational like Trevor. But I was aware there was no safety net for people like me. Holding on was all I could do. Sometimes though holding on is all you need to do.

Jesus

No one ever thinks it will happen to them. People never think they will win Lotto, but they still buy a ticket anyway, just in case. I never thought I would see my family again, but I still thought about them often and asked God to look after them.

It started out like any other day, no breakfast, just a gnawing hunger and the now familiar numbness. One of the men in our community, he used to be a doctor (leprosy doesn’t discriminate) asked me if I was coming with them. The man they called Jesus was rumoured to be passing by a couple of miles away.

This seemed strange to me. What was Jesus doing all the way out here on the border between Galilee and Samaria? I had nothing else to do so I joined the group. We had all heard about this man called Jesus, who apparently spoke with real authority, stood up to the religious authorities, drove out demons and healed people of all sorts of ailments. 

The ten of us walked in silence. There was no one around and therefore no reason to warn others we were coming. As we walked I felt something stir inside me. I didn’t recognise it at first because it had been a long time since I had felt it. It was hope. Hope is a frightening thing. Misplaced hope, hope that lifts you up only to dump you in a heap of disappointment, is dangerous.

Living with leprosy one learns to manage their hope. I had got into the habit of insuring against the loss of hope by thinking the worst. But that’s no way to live. You have to let some light in. You have to give yourself something to look forward to. Nothing too big. Just enough to keep you going.

So there I was, walking along in silence, aware of this tension within me. Torn between risking it all on this man they called Jesus and holding on to the security blanket of my despair. What if the rumours of Jesus passing our way were not true? Or even worse, what if the rumours were true but he rejected us? Rejection, by now, was my majority experience and it is very difficult to argue with your own experience.  

Unlike the other nine I had two strikes against me. Not only did I live with leprosy, I was a Palestinian from the West Bank and Jesus was an Israeli.

We came round a bend in the road and there he was. It’s strange how we had never seen the man before but somehow we knew it was him. Jesus had this presence about him. He was so centred, so completely at home in his own skin, so confident, without being a poser.

In your English Bibles it says that we stood at a distance and shouted out in a loud voice, ‘Jesus! Master! Have pity on us.’ The part about standing at a distance and shouting is true but that word translated in English as ‘pity’ isn’t quite right.

‘Pity’ urinates on dignity. It has a corrosive effect on your soul after a while. The pity of others makes you feel less somehow. It reminds you that you have nothing to offer, nothing the other person wants anyway. And it leaves you feeling worse than before. No, ‘pity’ is the wrong word.

In the Maori version of the New Testament, it says that we cried out for Jesus to have ‘aroha’ on us. Aroha is a better word. Aroha means love, affection or compassion. Aroha is what we wanted. Not money, not stones turned into bread, not a sign in the sky and certainly not pity. We wanted to be loved because when you are loved the emptiness in your heart is filled. When you are loved there is no room for loneliness but plenty of room for thankfulness.

Jesus saw us. I can’t begin to tell you what it means to be seen by Jesus. When you live with leprosy, people avoid looking at you. They pretend not to see you. They suddenly become interested in something on the ground. They don’t want to see you. But Jesus saw us. He looked at us and he understood the pain we were in, on the inside. My heart felt strangely warmed.   

Thinking about it later I reckon Jesus saw us because he was like us. Rejected, despised, misunderstood. There may have been a physical distance between us and Jesus on that road but there was communion with Christ in our hearts.

Jesus simply told us to ‘go and let the priests examine you’. This was in accordance with the law. Jesus was no liberal. Jesus did things by the book. Nor was he conservative though. Jesus transcended our categories and was in a class all of his own. He did something no one else has ever done. He fulfilled the law.

We hadn’t recovered from our leprosy though. At that point we were still unclean but we understood this was a test of faith. Naaman, the Syrian, was told by Elisha to wash in the River Jordan. Jesus told us to go and see the priests. So we obeyed, because Jesus had seen us and we trusted him.

I don’t remember the precise moment it happened but we hadn’t walked far when I became aware that the skin against my clothes was smooth again. Feeling had returned to my hands and feet. I felt around my eyes. The eyebrows and eyelashes had regrown. The ten of us looked around at each other. We had all been healed.

It was over. Our exile was ended. We were clean at last. We could finally go home to our families. We could find work and participate in worship once more. Maybe find a wife and start a family. All those things I hadn’t dared to hope for were now suddenly possible again.

We quickened our pace, looking for a priest to pronounce us clean as the law required. Then it occurred to me; Jesus was a priest of far higher standing than any in Jerusalem or Samaria. None of those priests could actually heal a person of leprosy. Jesus had healed me and so surely he could pronounce me clean.

I left the others and ran back to find Jesus. True worship comes from a thankful heart. I needed to worship God at the feet of Jesus. And so that’s what I did. Jesus is high priest and temple all rolled into one. In him the presence of God dwells.

When the man they call Jesus saw me do this he said to his disciples, “There were ten men who were healed; where are the other nine? Why is this foreigner the only one who came back to give thanks to God?”

Jesus was pointing out the irony to his disciples, that a Palestinian from the West Bank was more spiritually aware than the average Israelite was.

He called me a ‘foreigner’ because, from the disciples’ perspective, that’s what I was, a Samaritan. A traditional enemy to them. Someone they despised and thought was outside of God’s grace. Perhaps Jesus wanted his followers to become aware of their own prejudice. Maybe he wanted them to see that God loves all people, even Palestinian lepers.  

I’m not sure the disciples fully comprehended what Jesus was implying but eventually they would. Some years later a couple of those men came to the West Bank to tell us about Jesus, how he had been crucified and then raised to life on the third day. I welcomed them and they remembered me. 

I would have stayed there all day at Jesus’ feet but he said to me, “Get up and go; your faith has made you well.”

Jesus honoured me with his words. Those words gave me my dignity back. He is so generous. The credit for the healing belonged entirely to him and yet he shared the credit with me. He acknowledged the mustard seed of faith that I brought to the situation, respecting it like a precious pearl. For indeed it is.

Do you trust Jesus? Our trust is incredibly valuable to God. He treasures it more than we know.

Conclusion:

Sometimes we go through life unaware. Unaware of the hundreds of small miracles God performs for us each day. True worship comes from a thankful heart. A thankful heart funds kindness. My prayer for you is that you would let the light in and be aware that you are loved.

And if that seems impossible to believe right now, if you don’t want to take that kind of risk with your hope, then hold on. Jesus sees you.     

Will tells me you are going to sing a song now and collect a special offering for the leprosy mission.

May grace and peace be yours in abundance.

Questions for discussion or reflection:

What stands out for you in reading this Scripture and/or in listening to the sermon? Why do you think this stood out to you?

  • Who do you identify with most in the story Kevin told? Why is that do you think?
  • What does it mean to ‘let the light in’?  How might you let the light into your life?
  • In what ways did Jesus fulfill the law for the men he cured of leprosy?
  • Kevin made the comment that Jesus is high priest and temple all rolled into one. In what ways does Jesus function as a priest? In what ways does he function as a temple?
  • True worship comes from a thankful heart. Think of one thing from the past 24 hours that you are thankful for? Take some time to remain present to that thing in your mind. Write it down in your journal. Hold it in your awareness through the day. How might you express your gratitude to God? Repeat this ritual every day for a week (or as long as you can).
Tawa Baptist

Power

Scripture: Jonah

Structure:

  • Introduction
  • Patient & Omnipotent
  • Wise & Equitable
  • Redemptive
  • Conclusion

Introduction:

Good morning everyone.

You may have heard the saying: ‘Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men…’

This phrase was coined by Lord Acton, who was a British historian and politician during the 1800’s. He wrote this in a letter to an Anglican bishop. Whatever Lord Acton’s reason for writing about power in this way, it has stuck. It resonates with people. Generally speaking, we human beings are suspicious of power and reluctant to trust those who hold it.

Certainly we can think of many people throughout history who have abused power but really the problem is not power itself, the problem is with the human heart. Power simply reveals the contents of a person’s character. 

Sadly, a negative attitude to power tends to taint our faith in God. By definition God is the most powerful being there is and if we think that power corrupts then we may struggle to trust God.

We need to understand that God’s heart and character are quite different from that of a human being. This morning we are looking at five aspects of God’s character through the story of Jonah. That is, God’s patience, God’s omnipotence, God’s wisdom, God’s equity (or fairness) and God’s redemption. Firstly, let’s consider God’s patience and omnipotence.

Patient & Omnipotent:

Over the past couple of weeks, we have been fortunate enough to spend some time walking on the beach. The ocean is both powerful and patient. A beach is created over thousands of years as the surf gradually pounds stone and shell into sand. The work of the ocean points to the power and patience of God in transforming the human heart.

Patience is the ability to wait something out or endure something tedious, without losing your temper. Having patience means you can remain calm, even when you have been waiting ages or dealing with something painstakingly slow or trying to teach someone how to do something and they just don’t get it.

In Corinthians 13, when Paul writes about love, patience is the very first descriptor he uses. “Love is patient, love is kind…”

Patience, therefore, is an expression of love. 

Omnipotence simply means ‘all powerful’. Omni means ‘all’ or ‘everything’ and potence refers to ‘power’. Power is the ability to do something. To say that God is omnipotent, therefore, is to say that God can do all things; there is nothing beyond God’s ability or reach.

In the book of Jeremiah 32:27 the Lord says to the prophet, “Is anything too difficult for me?” It is a rhetorical question. The answer is clearly, ‘No, nothing is too difficult for the Lord’. God is omnipotent – all powerful.   

We see God’s patience and power in the story of Jonah…

The word of the Lord came to Jonah son of Amittai: 2 “Go to the great city of Ninevehand preach against it, because its wickedness has come up before me.”

3 But Jonah ran away from the Lord and headed for Tarshish. He went down to Joppa,where he found a ship bound for that port. After paying the fare, he went aboard and sailed for Tarshish to flee from the Lord.

You see, Jonah was an Israelite and Nineveh was the capital city of Assyria, the headquarters of Israel’s enemies. Most of the time when God told his prophets to preach a message against Israel’s enemies the prophets had the luxury of doing so from the relative comfort and safety of home. But God wanted Jonah to physically go to Nineveh and tell the Assyrians how bad they were.

Talk about a hospital pass. Jonah knew it was a bad assignment and so he got on a ship headed in the opposite direction. It was not that Jonah doubted God’s power. Jonah was quite convinced God could make the mission successful. And that was precisely the problem. Jonah did not want to be involved with saving his enemies. That would feel like a betrayal of his own people.

But God was patient with Jonah. In truth, God’s omnipotence (his power) is tempered or controlled by his patience. God waited for the ship to get out to sea and then he sent a storm. The storm was a frightening display of God’s omnipotence.

The pagan sailors did everything they could to save the ship but the storm just got worse. Meanwhile Jonah was asleep below deck. When the sailors woke him up he explained that he was running away from the Lord of heaven and earth, who made the land and sea. Their best chance of survival was to throw him overboard.

The sailors were honourable men and did not want to do this but eventually Jonah persuaded them and as soon as the prophet hit the water the storm stopped. Once again God’s omnipotence was on display, this time to bring a great calm.     

God’s omnipotence is not limited to the weather though. God has power over all things. God sent a giant fish to swallow Jonah whole. The incredible thing here is not that Jonah was eaten by a fish. The truly incredible thing is that Jonah was able to remain alive inside the fish. 

This may seem impossible to some of us but that is precisely the point: God is omnipotent, nothing is too difficult for the Lord. Not only that but God is in control, not Jonah and not us, which is just as well.

A giant fish that can swallow a man whole, without digesting him, is a symbol of God’s patient omnipotence. The Lord has the power to destroy Jonah but instead God uses the very same power to save his messenger.   

God’s omnipotence and patience go together. God did not get frustrated with Jonah. God did not use his power to kill Jonah. Nor did God use his power to overthrow Jonah’s will. It may have been much easier and quicker for God to find someone else to go. But God’s ways are not our ways.

God waits for Jonah and his patience is rewarded. After Jonah had repented from the belly of the fish, the fish spat him out on dry land and Jonah went to Nineveh in obedience to God. 

God’s patience (his fuse) is very long indeed. When the nation of Israel turned away from him, the Lord patiently waited for them to return for a couple of hundred years.

And he waits patiently for the world to turn to him again. As we read in 2nd Peter 3:9, The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. Instead he is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance.     

God’s omnipotence is tempered by his patience. What’s more, God is wise and equitable in his dealings with creation.

Wise & Equitable:

We live in a democracy but the Kingdom of God is not a democracy. The Kingdom of God is a theocracy, which means it is ruled by God. Heaven is a place where God’s will is done. This is not to imply that God is a dictator. No. Dictators are closed to the voice of the people and tend to eliminate anyone who disagrees with them. By contrast, God is secure enough within himself to be open to what his subjects have to say. God listens to people and takes our thoughts and feelings into account when making his decisions. That is one of the reasons we pray.

When Jonah finally made it to Nineveh his preaching was simple. “In forty days Nineveh will be destroyed.” At first that sounds like a very closed message. There is no hope in it. No call to repentance. No nuance. No clever illustrations. No compassion. No redemption. No PR. No subtle maneuvering of the media. Just doom and destruction.

Nevertheless, Jonah’s message was wise and fair. While God is patient, he is no one’s fool. God’s omnipotence includes the capacity to destroy. God must be worshipped. If we do not put God first (if we worship something else in God’s place) then God is well within his rights to exercise his power either to destroy the things we worship or to destroy us.

God gave Jonah that message for Nineveh because the people’s behavior was very bad. They were incredibly violent and ruthless. God’s sentence on the people may have seemed harsh but it was wise and equitable, it was fair. God could not, in good conscience, allow the Assyrians to run amuck oppressing other people groups. That would not be kind or just. 

Jesus said the measure we use for others is the measure God will use for us. If we are generous with others, God will be generous with us and vice versa. The Assyrians were violent in their treatment of others so God gave them fair warning, he would destroy them.    

We can see God’s wisdom in sending Jonah. While Jonah’s preaching was incredibly blunt, it was also without pretense or guile. He did not disguise his contempt for the Assyrians and this (paradoxically) made his message all the more believable. Had God sent a diplomat to speak smooth words, the people of Nineveh probably would not have believed the message.

In response the people of Nineveh decided that everyone should fast, which means go without food. And everyone from the least to the greatest was to put on sackcloth to show they had repented.

The king of Nineveh issued a decree that all people must pray earnestly to God and must give up their evil ways. Perhaps God will change his mind and we will not die, they thought. 

God saw what they did; he saw that they had given up their wicked behavior. So he changed his mind and did not punish them as he had said he would.      

The people were open to change their ways and so God was open to give them another chance. 

As much as it grated with Jonah to preach to his enemies, actually, it was in Israel’s interests. Having their enemies bow to Yahweh was a victory of sorts. From a political point of view, Nineveh’s repentance meant some respite for Israel.

Not only that but God’s mercy with the Assyrians offered hope to Israel when they strayed from God’s path. If God relented with the Assyrians, then how much more when Israel repented.

God is patient and omnipotent. He is also wise and equitable. Ultimately though, the Lord’s patience & power, wisdom & justice, all serve the purpose of redemption.

Redemption:

As I mentioned earlier, we were fortunate enough to walk the beach during our holiday. The beaches between Pekapeka and Paekakariki collect quite a bit of drift wood. As a consequence, you see these wooden structures at regular intervals along the beach. People have redeemed the drift wood and detritus for a creative and useful purpose. Human beings seem to have this insatiable urge to build shelters with whatever is at hand. 

I wonder if this urge to build and create and redeem reflects something of the residue of God’s image in us. It is interesting that when God became a man (in the person of Jesus) he chose to apprentice himself to a carpenter, a builder.

In any building or renovation project there is usually some demolition involved. But this demolition serves the ultimate purpose of creating and constructing something new and better.      

To redeem something is to reclaim it, to save it or restore it. God’s heart, his preference, is to redeem whatever he can. The story of Jonah is full of God’s redemption. Let me touch briefly on three examples.

First there is the way God redeems Jonah’s running away. God used Jonah’s disobedience to inspire the sailors’ worship.

I said before that the sailors were honourable men. They may have been pagans but they were good pagans. They had a moral compass and wanted to do the right thing. At the height of the storm, just before they reluctantly threw Jonah overboard, the sailors cried out to the Lord saying…   

14 “Please, Lord, do not let us die for taking this man’s life. Do not hold us accountable for killing an innocent man,for you, Lord, have done as you pleased.” 15 Then they took Jonah and threw him overboard, and the raging sea grew calm. 16 At this the men greatly fearedthe Lord, and they offered a sacrifice to the Lord and made vowsto him.

If Jonah had not done a runner, the sailors would not have encountered the Lord in the way they did. The sailors’ prayer shows us they believed the God of Israel to be powerful, just and wise. Jonah’s attempt to get away from the Lord actually resulted in the sailors getting closer to the Lord. That is the power of God’s redemption.

The second main act of redemption is seen when God changes his mind and decides not to destroy Nineveh. The people of Nineveh are similar to the pagan sailors in that they recognize the power and justice of God and submit themselves to the Lord in fear and hope.

The Assyrians’ redemption is not unconditional or automatic. Their redemption hinges on their response to Jonah, their enemy. Paradoxically they are saved by trusting the word of their enemy. Sort of like in the second Terminator movie when Sarah Connor is confronted by a Terminator who she thinks is out to kill her. But the Terminator (played by Arnie) says, ‘Come with me if you want to live’. The people of Nineveh were helped by their enemy. This shows God’s wise redemption.

But the one who is offered more redemption than anyone else is Jonah himself. At the beginning of the story Jonah is like the younger prodigal son who has run away from home. But God redeems Jonah and puts him on the right path again using a storm and a sea monster. 

By the end of the story though, after God relented and saved Nineveh, Jonah is more like the older son in Jesus’ parable (in Luke 15). Just as the older son stood outside the party refusing to celebrate the return of his younger prodigal brother, so too Jonah sat outside the city of Nineveh refusing to celebrate the Assyrians’ repentance and salvation. In chapter 4 of the book of Jonah we read,

But to Jonah this seemed very wrong, and he became angry. 2 He prayed to the Lord, “Isn’t this what I said, Lord, when I was still at home? That is why I tried to forestall by fleeing to Tarshish. I knewthat you are a graciousand compassionate God, slow to anger and abounding in love, a God who relents from sending calamity. 3 Now, Lord, take away my life,for it is better for me to diethan to live.”

Jonah acknowledges that it is God’s heart and character to redeem but strangely this makes Jonah depressed. He’s had enough and wants it to be over.

There are any number of reasons why someone might become depressed, human beings are complex. But the cause of Jonah’s depression is related to his anger. If you hold onto your anger and resentment, if you bury it deep inside, the in-rage you feel will eventually result in depression.

This is not to suggest that all depression is caused by repressed anger. But we know it was the case for Jonah because God says to the prophet, “Is it right for you to be angry?”   

This is another rhetorical question. We all know it was not right for Jonah to be angry but Jonah has to arrive at that conclusion himself. Even though God is omnipotent he does not click his fingers and resolve the issue for Jonah. He makes Jonah do some inner (soul) work.

Jonah was angry and depressed but God did not give Jonah a pill or counselling or a support group or cognitive behavioural therapy, as helpful as some of those things may be. God patiently sought to redeem Jonah by giving him a parable. 

5 Jonah had gone out and sat down at a place east of the city. There he made himself a shelter, sat in its shade and waited to see what would happen to the city. [I imagine this shelter was similar to what one might see on the beach along the Kapiti Coast.] The Lord God provideda leafy plantand made it grow up over Jonah to give shade for his head to ease his discomfort, and Jonah was very happy about the plant. 7 But at dawn the next day God provided a worm, which chewed the plant so that it withered. 8 When the sun rose, God provided a scorching east wind, and the sun blazed on Jonah’s head so that he grew faint. He wanted to die,and said, “It would be better for me to die than to live.”

9 But God said to Jonah, “Is it right for you to be angry about the plant?”

“It is,” he said. “And I’m so angry I wish I were dead.”

10 But the Lord said, “You have been concerned about this plant, though you did not tend it or make it grow. It sprang up overnight and died overnight. 11 And should I not have concernfor the great city of Nineveh,in which there are more than a hundred and twenty thousand people who cannot tell their right hand from their left—and also many animals?”

And that is how the story of Jonah ends. God has the last word.

The Lord’s message to Jonah seems to be that Jonah is the one who is not being fair and equitable.

If it was up to Jonah the city of Nineveh would be destroyed but God’s power (his omnipotence) is different from the way human beings exercise power. God’s power is tempered with patience, guided by wisdom and equity and used to serve his redemptive purpose.  

Conclusion:

God is free to use his power as he wishes. Sometimes that will disappoint us and make us angry, as it did with Jonah. We do not control God and we cannot leverage his power for our own ends. We have to make peace with the fact that we are not in the place of God. We are not omnipotent. We have to embrace our powerlessness and let God be God. Or, as Jesus put it, we must pick up our cross and follow him.

Like Jesus’ parable of the two sons in, Luke 15, we don’t know how the story of Jonah ends. We don’t know whether the older son let go of his anger and joined the party. Nor do we know how Jonah responded. Did he sit with his resentment or did he find redemption?

This is not a rhetorical question. It is not an abstract theoretical debate about a man who lived thousands of years ago. It is a very real existential question that we must all face. If it hasn’t happened already it is just a matter of time before you will feel disappointed by God. When that day comes (and I expect for many of us here it has already arrived) I pray that we will be able to forgive.

Forgiveness is the greatest power available to us. It is the pathway to redemption.  

Questions for discussion or reflection:

  • What stands out for you in reading this Scripture and/or in listening to the sermon? Why do you think this stood out to you?
  • How does God’s power make you feel? In what ways is God’s power different from the way human beings exercise power?
  • In what ways do we see God’s patience and power at work in the story of Jonah? In what ways are you aware of God’s patience and power at work in your own life?  
  • In what ways do we see God’s wisdom and equity (fairness) in the story of Jonah?
  • Discuss / reflect on the various aspects of God’s redemption in Jonah. For example, how does God redeem Jonah’s running away? How has God redeemed your mistakes?      
  • The people of Nineveh were saved by believing the word of Jonah, their enemy. Can you think of a time in your own life when God has used an enemy to help or save you?
  • Why does Jonah want his life to end? How does God help Jonah? What does Jonah need to do to find redemption? Have you ever felt disappointed by God, like Jonah? If so, how did you find redemption from resentment?
Tawa Baptist

Joy to the World

Scripture: Psalm 98

Structure:

  • Introduction
  • Joy
  • To the World
  • Conclusion

Introduction:

Good morning everyone.

I have here in my hand a piece of fruit, an apple to be precise. Apples do not take long to eat. Maybe five minutes if you are not in a hurry. They take a lot longer to grow. If I were to plant the seeds out of this apple and nurture them, it could take anywhere between 5 to 12 years before the seeds produced more apples to eat. That’s a long time.

Earlier in the year we did an Anthems series, featuring some of the hymns and worship songs of the Christian faith. Today, because we are in the season of Christmas Advent, we take a break from our series in First Peter to focus on the well-known Christian anthem Joy to the World.

Joy is like an apple tree, it takes time to grow and produce fruit.

Joy to the World was written by Isaac Watts back in 1719, over 300 years ago. Isaac was the minister of the Mark Lane Congregational Chapel, a large independent church in London. Part of his ministry included training preachers.

Most of you would have heard of Eugene Peterson, who translated the entire Bible into an English paraphrase, for modern readers, called The Message. Well, the song Joy to the World is also a kind of paraphrase of Scripture. Isaac Watts did a similar thing with the Psalms of the Old Testament. Joy to the World is Isaac Watt’s poetic translation of Psalm 98, verses 4-9.

Let me read you the whole of Psalm 98 now…

Sing to the Lord a new song, for he has done marvelous things;
his right hand and his holy arm have worked salvation for him.
2 The Lord has made his salvation known
    and revealed his righteousness to the nations.
3 He has rememberedhis love and his faithfulness to Israel;
all the ends of the earth have seen the salvation of our God.

4 Shout for joy to the Lord, all the earth, burst into jubilant song with music;
5 make music to the Lord with the harp, with the harp and the sound of singing,
6 with trumpetsand the blast of the ram’s horn—

 shout for joybefore the Lord, the King.

7 Let the sea resound, and everything in it, the world, and all who live in it.
8 Let the rivers clap their hands, let the mountainssing together for joy;
9 let them sing before the Lord, for he comes to judge the earth.
He will judge the world in righteousness and the peoples with equity.

May the Spirit of Jesus illuminate God’s word for us.

Joy:

Joy is not the same as happiness. Joy is more resilient, deeper, less fleeting. There is a certain happiness with eating an apple, but that happiness does not last for long. Once the apple is eaten, and hunger returns, the happiness fades. Joy is more like the whole tree. Joy has its roots in the soil of hope. The tree of joy goes on bearing fruit year after year.

I said before that joy takes time to grow. Although Isaac Watts wrote the words for Joy to the World in 1719, his poetry was not put to music until over 100 years later, in 1836, by Lowell Mason. Some say that Mason’s tune was borrowed from the composer George Handel. Others say the similarity is coincidence. Whatever the case, the song Joy to the World started as a poem, much like an apple starts as a seed.

Isaac Watts never really intended the poem to be a Christmas carol. He was simply reinterpreting the psalms through the lens of Christ. What are these ancient songs saying when we understand the Lord (Yahweh) as referring to Jesus?      

Lowell Mason was a music teacher in the United States. He published Joy to the World during the Christmas season and it caught on as a Christmas carol celebrating the birth of Jesus. 

There is a certain joy in doing something creative. Whether that’s writing a poem or a song or doing wood turning or baking or painting. Whatever it is we create, takes on a life of its own that may be used by God in ways that we could never have imagined, much like Isaac Watt’s paraphrase of Psalm 98. 

We have compared joy to a fruit tree. We might also compare joy to the keel of a yacht. The keel is that part of the hull of a boat that we do not see because it is underwater. The keel keeps the yacht upright, especially in high winds. Without the keel the yacht would be prone to capsizing.

In the same way a keel lends stability to a boat, so too joy (born from hope) lends stability to our soul, especially in the storms of life.   

We have come through a pretty tough year in many respects. 2020 has been a perfect storm in many ways. Covid has affected so many different aspects of life, even more so overseas than in New Zealand. We are a bit sick of hearing about 2020 and all its difficulties so I won’t go on about it. We look forward (tentatively) to what 2021 might hold – hopefully something better.

This hope of a better year ahead is not unfounded. We have seen reports on the news of how a vaccine against Covid is being rolled out across the UK. While it may take some months for the benefits of this to be felt across the world, there is a certain joy in hearing a remedy is on its way. This joy acts as a kind of keel for our soul; it helps to provide some stability to our lives now.  

Psalm 98 begins with the phrase: Sing to the Lord a new song, for he has done marvelous things;

There are a number of psalms which talk about singing a new song to the Lord. This does not mean checking out the latest release from Hillsong. It means we have been through hard times and we are sick of singing the old songs of lament. We are sick of hearing and talking about Covid. We want something good to look forward to. God has given us a reason to stop singing sad songs and start singing joyful songs in praise of the marvellous things He has done. 

Walter Brueggemann classifies Psalm 98 as a Psalm of new orientation. Psalms of new orientation are songs written after a community has come out of a difficult time. Sometimes life throws us curve balls or is not fair and we go through a period of suffering and disorientation, when we do not know what way is up. After we have passed through the crucible of disorientation we emerge with a new orientation, a new perspective, a new way of looking at things.    

Most of the book of Job describes one man’s dis-orientation. But at the end, after God has spoken, Job sees things differently and is able to sing a new song. He is able to praise the Lord again. Job’s perspective has been enlarged, so now he has a new orientation, one which is deeper and broader in its scope.

Psalm 98 resonates with a number of experiences in Israel’s history, especially their experience of being set free from exile in Babylon. After nearly 70 years as captives in a foreign land, God let the exiles return home to Jerusalem and gave them a whole new orientation. Psalm 98 served as a helpful vehicle for praise in that situation.

While 2020 is only one year, and does not really compare with the many years of oppression Israel suffered in Babylon, Psalm 98 is the kind of song a community might sing after emerging from a year like 2020. It may also be the sort of song one might sing after emerging from a period of sustained personal grief or a crisis of faith.

To the World:      

Returning to our image of joy as an apple tree. You cannot eat all the apples yourself. Apples were made for sharing. Joy is multiplied in the sharing. In sharing your apples, you make friends with your neighbours and you get to feel good about doing something life-giving for someone else.

Psalm 98 is made up of three sections. Verses 1-3 are a call for Israel to praise God as their Saviour. Verses 4-6 are a call for all the peoples of the world to praise God as King. And verses 7-9 are a call for all creation (including the non-human world) to praise God as Judge.

The joy in view here is not just for a select lucky few. The joy is for the whole world. The joy is universal in scope.

Verses 1, 2 & 4 of Isaac Watts’ song capture something of the universal scope of the joy associated with Christ’s coming. Verse 1 reads:

Joy to the World; the Lord is come! Let earth receive her King!
Let every heart prepare Him room, And Heaven and nature sing.

As I mentioned earlier the Lord that Isaac Watts has in mind here is Jesus. The Lord Jesus is a King. Not just any king but the King of kings. To call Jesus ‘King’ is to say that all power and authority rests with him. Jesus is to be honoured and obeyed, not out of fear of punishment, but enthusiastically and willingly because he is a good King.

The joy is in knowing that Christ is a King who brings salvation and peace to the world, not war, oppression and misery as other kings might.  

Jesus’ coming is past, present and future. Jesus has come to earth as a baby born in a manger 2000 years’ ago. But we also await his second coming in glory, at some point in the future. Then there is the sense in which Jesus comes to us in the present, by his Spirit entering our heart.

Now it needs to be said that Psalm 98 does not talk about preparing room in our heart for the Lord. Isaac Watts borrowed that idea from the New Testament. And we can easily see the Christmas connection, with Mary & Joseph struggling to find a room to stay in when they went to Bethlehem for the census. 

What then does it mean to prepare Jesus room in our heart? I think this phrase is talking about at least two things: intimacy and imitation.

Firstly, intimacy. Your heart is your inner most core. It is a private place and a sacred part of yourself. It is rightly closed off from public view. The door of your heart has no handle on the outside. It can only be opened from the inside. Most people are not allowed access to your heart but you may choose to let some people in.

To let Jesus into your heart means to show him hospitality and share with him at the deepest level. Preparing room in our heart for Christ requires us to the make ourselves vulnerable and trust the Lord. It means being honest with him and letting him see how poor we are on the inside. To let Jesus into our heart is to risk loving him.

When you let someone in like that you allow them to know the real you. At the end of the day the thing that matters is not how many sermons we preached or how many people we healed. What matters, when all is said and done, is whether Jesus knows us. [1] 

So making room for Jesus in our heart is about intimacy. But it’s also about imitation, as in the imitation of Christ.

Your heart is to your soul what ground control is to an astronaut – it is the command centre. To prepare room for Jesus in our heart means to imitate Christ by taking our instructions from him, like an astronaut following the orders of ground control.

Your heart is to your soul what the Beehive is to New Zealand – it is the parliament in which decisions are considered and made. To prepare room for Jesus in our heart means to imitate Christ by letting him be our Prime Minister and following his lead.

Your heart is to your soul what a cockpit is to an aeroplane – it is the place from which you control yourself and set the direction for your life. To prepare room for Jesus in our heart means to imitate Christ by being his co-pilot. He is the captain and His Spirit is the navigator. We are not passengers in our own lives, sitting in the back eating biscuits and drinking coffee. No. We are in the cockpit actively flying our soul with Jesus alongside us setting the course.    

To prepare him room in our heart is about intimacy and imitation. We need to let Jesus in and we need to follow his example, because he is our King.

The universal scope of Jesus’ salvation comes out again in verse 2 of the song, which reads…


Joy to the earth, the Saviour reigns! Let men their songs employ;
While fields & floods, rocks, hills & plains repeat the sounding joy.

Jesus is not just the Saviour of humanity, he is also the Saviour of non-human creation as well: fields & floods, rocks, hills & plains. This is a way of describing all things high and low. The reference to floods is perhaps a poetic way of including all sorts of weather. As we heard a couple of weeks ago, nothing is beyond Jesus’ reach.  

One thing about joy is that it must be expressed. The kind of joy Psalm 98 and Isaac Watts are writing about cannot be contained. It is graceful and dignified. A mountain or a field does not make a lot of noise but its very presence, its natural beauty, echoes the permanence and majesty of God the creator.

We have likened joy to an apple tree and to the keel of a boat. Psalm 98 makes it clear that joy is also a positive energy, the energy that comes from hope.

If hope is like a wind turbine, then joy is the electricity generated by the turbine. Or if hope is like a hydro dam, then joy is the power generated by the hydro dam. Or if hope is like an open fire, then joy is the heat given off by the fireplace. Or if hope is like a candle, then joy is the light shining from the wick.  

You know when you are climbing a mountain, just putting one foot in front of the other, it feels like it’s taking forever and you are never going to get there, when all of a sudden you turn a corner, see the summit and realise the end is in sight. It is at that point, that you get a second wind. You get a fresh surge of energy to keep going and finish the climb.

Joy is that positive energy generated by hope, when we see the end in sight. It must be expressed. And what better way to express joy than in praise to God.

Verse 3 of Isaac Watt’s song is probably not familiar to most of us. We tend not to sing it. Verse 3 reads…


No more let sins and sorrows grow, nor thorns infest the ground;
He comes to make his blessings flow far as the curse is found.

This verse of the song does not come from Psalm 98, at least not directly. It comes from Genesis 3, where God curses the ground after Adam & Eve sinned by eating the forbidden fruit from the tree of knowledge.

Jesus’ coming is joy to the world because Jesus reverses the curse of sin. The idea that all of creation, including the ground, is affected by Christ’s coming is touched on in Romans 8 where the apostle Paul writes…

19 For the creation waits in eager expectation for the children of God to be revealed. 20 For the creation was subjected to frustration, not by its own choice, but by the will of the one who subjected it, in hope 21 thatthe creation itself will be liberated from its bondage to decay and brought into the freedom and glory of the children of God. 22 We know that the whole creation has been groaning as in the pains of childbirth right up to the present time.

Jesus’ coming means joy for all creation because Christ liberates the ground from the curse of sin and he liberates human beings from our bondage to sin as well.

The last verse of Joy to the World reads…

 
He rules the world with truth and grace, and makes the nations prove
The glories of His righteousness, and wonders of His love.

This verse roughly equates to the end of Psalm 98 where the author writes…

9 let them sing before the Lord, for he comes to judge the earth.
He will judge the world in righteousness and the peoples with equity.

Isaac Watts does not directly talk about Christ as a ‘judge’ but that is what he means when he refers to Jesus as one who rules the world with truth and grace.  

We might tend to shy away from the thought of judgement and may prefer to not think of Jesus as our judge. This may be because we have a distorted view of what judgement is. For us, here in New Zealand, judgement is associated with destructive criticism and putting people down. (Tall poppy syndrome.) But that is not what is meant by Psalm 98 or Isaac Watts.

Jesus does not judge the world with harsh criticism and blind condemnation. No. Jesus judges the world in a compassionate and discerning way with truth and grace. Truth sets people free and grace is something good that we do not deserve. With Jesus truth and grace always go together.

Furthermore, Jesus judges us as someone who is human himself. Jesus understands how difficult it is to walk this life. He wrestled with suffering and temptation as we all do, except he was without sin. To have a judge who is one of us, and who gets us, makes all the difference.

The other thing we note is that Jesus judges the world in righteousness. This means that he is fair and equitable. More than that though it means that Jesus puts things right. His justice restores people and things. Jesus did not come to punish and condemn. He came to make all things new. 

You may have heard the story of Fiorello LaGuardia, who was mayor of New York City during the worst days of the Great Depression and all of WWII.

One bitterly cold night in January 1935, the mayor turned up at a night court that served the poorest ward of the city. LaGuardia dismissed the judge for the evening and took over the bench himself. Within a few minutes, a tattered old woman was brought before him, charged with stealing a loaf of bread. She told LaGuardia that her daughter’s husband had deserted her, her daughter was sick, and her two grandchildren were starving. But the shopkeeper, from whom the bread was stolen, refused to drop the charges.

“It’s a real bad neighbourhood, your Honour.” the man told the mayor. “She’s got to be punished to teach other people around here a lesson.” LaGuardia sighed. I expect he was sick of hearing the same old sad tune. So the mayor did something new. He did something creative. Something that would take on a life of its own.

He turned to the woman and said “I’ve got to punish you. The law makes no exceptions—ten dollars or ten days in jail.”

But even as he pronounced the sentence, the mayor was already reaching into his pocket. He took out a $10 bill and tossed it into his famous sombrero saying: “Here is the ten dollar fine which I now remit; and furthermore I am going to fine everyone in this courtroom fifty cents for living in a town where a person has to steal bread so that her grandchildren can eat. Mr. Baliff, collect the fines and give them to the defendant.”

The following day the New York City newspapers reported that $47.50 was turned over to a bewildered old lady who had stolen a loaf of bread to feed her starving grandchildren. [2]

I am pretty sure not everyone who appeared before the judge that evening got bailed out by the mayor. I imagine those without a good excuse paid the fine or went to jail, but that’s not the point. LaGuardia’s message was, we need to sing a new song. We need to get a new orientation. We need to be kind and learn to love our neighbour in creative ways.  

Mayor LaGuardia’s justice was an imitation of Jesus’ justice. It is a justice that restores. Jesus is a judge who puts things right and in the process gives us a new orientation. Jesus’ righteousness puts the whole world right. He makes all things new.

Conclusion:

Psalm 98 and the song Joy to the World are a call to worship – a call to share the joy. This call starts with God’s people and enlarges to encompass all of humanity and indeed all of creation. 

Jesus comes as a Saviour, a King and a righteous Judge and that is cause for real joy because it means Jesus is going to put everything right.

One final observation. Unlike many other psalms, psalm 98 makes no mention of enemies. The joy that God brings eclipses all evil and fills our soul leaving no room for bitterness or grief.

May the goodness of God fill us with joy so completely that all fear and anxiety, all bitterness and resentment would be cleansed from our hearts.

Grace and peace be yours in abundance.

[1] Refer Matthew 7:21-23

[2] Brennan Manning, The Ragmuffin Gospel, Multnomah, 1990, pp. 91-2

Tawa Baptist

AAA

Scripture: 1st Peter 4:1-6

Structure:

  • Introduction
  • Attitude
  • Abstinence
  • Accountability
  • Conclusion

Introduction:

Good morning everyone.

Some years ago, before the internet, each household with a landline phone was given a telephone book. This book was quite thick (thicker than it is today) and was divided into two sections, a white pages and a yellow pages.

Since the book was organized in alphabetical order, some tradesmen used to put three AAA’s in front of their name so they would be the first in the phone book. The three AAA’s did not stand for anything necessarily. The idea was that the triple AAA Plumbing company was going to get more business because it was easier for people to find their number.

The internet is not organized in the same way, so putting three AAA’s in front of your company’s name does not really work anymore.     

Today we continue our series in the New Testament letter of first Peter, focusing on chapter 4, verses 1-6. This is a kind of triple AAA passage, except these A’s do stand for something: Attitude, Abstinence and Accountability. From 1st Peter 4, verses 1-6, we read…   

Therefore, since Christ suffered in his body, arm yourselves also with the same attitude, because whoever suffers in the body is done with sin. 2 As a result, they do not live the rest of their earthly lives for evil human desires, but rather for the will of God. 3 For you have spent enough time in the past doing what pagans choose to do—living in debauchery, lust, drunkenness, orgies, carousing and detestable idolatry. 4 They think it strange that you do not plunge with them into the same flood of dissipation, and they heap abuse on you. 5 But they will have to give account to him who is ready to judge the living and the dead. 6 For this is the reason the gospel was preached even to those who are now dead,so that they might be judged according to human standards in regard to the body, but live according to God in regard to the spirit.

May the Spirit of Jesus illuminate God’s word for us.

In this reading Peter addresses the need for Christians to have the right attitude to suffering, to abstain from immoral behavior and he reminds us that everyone will be held accountable to God for the way they have behaved in this life. Let’s start with the first of Peter’s three A’s; Attitude.

Attitude:

If you are in the police force or the fire service or if you work in the emergency department of a hospital, then you know that in your line of work you are going to face some fairly confronting situations. Although you are there to help people and to do good, not everyone is going to cooperate with you or appreciate your presence. Therefore, in going to work, you prepare yourself mentally.

In the same way a police officer puts on a stab proof vest and a firefighter wears special protective clothing and a doctor or nurse puts on PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) so too they arm themselves mentally with the right kind of attitude or mindset to cope with the unpredictable nature of their work.

In verse 1 of chapter 4 Peter writes: Therefore, since Christ suffered in his body, arm yourselves also with the same attitude, because whoever suffers in the body is done with sin.

Peter’s first century readers were (generally speaking) not understood and not liked by the wider society in which they lived. Earlier in the letter Peter had described the Christian community as aliens and strangers in this world.

With this in mind believers needed to have the right mental attitude to suffering. Like a police officer or a fire-fighter, they needed to go into the day with their eyes open, not expecting it to be easy but being prepared to suffer in some way.

It’s like when a rugby player places themselves to catch the high ball. They do so knowing they are likely to get pummeled in a running tackle. Or an opening batsman in a test match knows they have to stay sharp to avoid the bouncers and body blows coming their way from the fast bowlers fresh with the new ball.

When Peter, says whoever suffers in the body is done with sin, he does not mean that believers have attained sinless perfection. Rather he means those who commit themselves to suffer, who willingly endure scorn and mockery for their faith, show they have triumphed over sin. [1] They show that their commitment to a new way of life is greater than their commitment to their old way of life. They are not perfect yet, but they are on a completely different path.

Now in saying that Christians should be mentally prepared to suffer, we need to be careful not to misunderstand Peter’s intention. The suffering in view here is as representatives of Christ. While God does have ways of redeeming any kind of suffering, it does not automatically follow that all suffering is good. Sometimes suffering can cause us to walk in the way of righteousness and other times it actually makes us more vulnerable to sin.

For example, if you grew up with alcoholic parents and suffered as a child because of it, that suffering might motivate you to avoid the same mistakes that your parents made. But it might also make you more susceptible to following in their footsteps.

Or if you suffer from loneliness, then it could have the effect of softening your heart and making you more open, more kind, more available to those who don’t fit in easily. Then again it could drive you to drink or adultery.

Suffering, in the form of depression, can reduce your capacity to enjoy bodily pleasures (like eating and drinking and sex). But by the same token it can also rob you of hope and take away your ability to praise God. Losing all lust for life is not a good thing.

Suffering can take you down any number of paths. Suffering is not intrinsically virtuous. So we don’t want to go looking for suffering. There is enough suffering in this life without adding to it. The suffering of illness. The suffering of old age. The suffering of wars and pandemics and economic hardship. The list goes on. Better to try and enjoy life within God’s boundaries.

In any case, the kind of suffering Peter has in mind in these verses is not the random suffering anyone might experience in life. Rather it is suffering as a consequence of doing God’s will. Verse 2 of chapter 4 makes it clear that our attitude or mind set needs to be oriented towards God’s will, even if that means some discomfort for us in this life.

We won’t always get a hard time from non-Christians for being faithful to God. In fact, we may get respect. But Peter’s readers lived in a culture that earned them dishonor and disrespect for living a Christian lifestyle. Because the way of Jesus is foreign to the ways of the world, it is inevitable that Jesus’ followers will suffer through their association with Christ.    

Jesus certainly had a mindset, an attitude and an orientation of being obedient to his heavenly Father, even if that meant suffering. Jesus consciously and intentionally embraced his God given calling.

In Luke 9, we read that Jesus set his face like flint toward Jerusalem. Jesus knew it was God’s will for him to go to Jerusalem where he would suffer and die. Did he want to suffer like this? No, not really. But he set out resolutely – he steeled his mind, he armed himself with the right kind of mental attitude, to face the coming trial.

We see Jesus’ attitude to suffering for the will of God most clearly in the Garden of Gethsemane, where he prepared himself for the pain of the cross. In Luke 22:44 we read: And being in anguish, he prayed more earnestly, and his sweat was like drops of blood falling to the ground.

Jesus armed himself with the right attitude through anguished prayer.

Now, while it is true that we need to be mentally prepared to suffer for doing God’s will, wisdom requires us to maintain a healthy balance in our attitude. No one can function at high alert all the time. No one can sustain Gethsemane level intensity for very long.

When a police officer or fire-fighter or ED worker finishes their shift, they need to take time off to relax and decompress. They need to find something else to think about so the job does not swallow them whole.

While we can never really switch off from being a Christian (because it’s a 24-7 gig) we still need to make sacred time and space to enjoy life in a healthy way. We need to stop sometimes and recognize the good news. If we go into every day thinking: ‘Here we go again, another round of suffering for Jesus’, then we run the risk of developing a siege mentality and always expecting the worst.

So there is a balance to find here in our attitude, between being ready to suffer for righteousness and ready to celebrate the good things.

Okay, so having the right attitude is Peter’s first A. The second A stands for abstinence.

Abstinence:

Getting baptized and becoming a Christian means abstaining from certain behaviours that do not characterize Christ. To abstain means to not do something.

A couple of months ago there was a short series on TV3 called Match Fit. Match Fit featured a number of ex-All Blacks, who Graham Henry & Buck Shelford brought out of retirement to play in a one off game against a Barbarians side.                     

Most of these players were out of shape. The programme showed some of the things they did to get ready to play at Eden Park. A big part of the preparation was having the right mental fitness, the right attitude. They had to get their head sorted at the same time they worked on their bodies.

Getting match fit also required the players to make a radical change to their lifestyle. They had to re-establish healthy routines of eating, training and resting. This meant a certain amount of abstinence. No more eating pies and chips and lollies.

One of the things their trainer said, which stuck with me, was that when you take something bad out of your diet, replace it with something good. So don’t just abstain from eating chocolate biscuits. Don’t just go hungry. Eat a carrot or an apple instead because your body still needs fuel to function.

In verses 2-3 of chapter 4, Peter writes:      

As a result, they [meaning those who have the same attitude as Christ] do not live the rest of their earthly lives for evil human desires, but rather for the will of God. 3 For you have spent enough time in the past doing what pagans choose to do—living in debauchery, lust, drunkenness, orgies, carousing and detestable idolatry.

Peter is talking here about abstaining from self-indulgence and immoral behavior. He is saying, when you abstain from debauchery, drunkenness, orgies and idolatry, replace these things with the will of God. The will of God is healthy food for us. The will of God is like fruit and vegetables for our soul. It might not always be to our taste but it is good for us and it sustains us.

Now some of the words in Peter’s vice list are self-explanatory, like drunkenness, we all know what that looks like. But there are a couple of words there that you may not be familiar with like ‘carousing’ for instance. Carousing is another word for a loud drinking party. The sort that brings noise control out. Like ‘crate day’.  Debauchery refers to an over indulgence in bodily pleasures, particularly sexual pleasures. And idolatry is the worship of anything other than the one true God.

Eating and drinking and having sex with temple prostitutes was often part and parcel of the pagan religions of Peter’s day. The Romans and Greeks had made a religion out of debauchery and carousing. For them getting drunk and having orgies was not considered bad behavior. For them it went hand in hand with appeasing the gods and being a good citizen. 

In contrast to the paganism of the first century, a Christian lifestyle is not characterized by excess, but by moderation. Balance is important. It is usually better to avoid extremes because the pendulum of desire has a way of swinging back in the other direction.

In other words, it is okay to drink alcohol so long as you don’t get drunk. Of course, if you are not able to stop at one drink then you are best not to start drinking at all. It does not work to go out on a bender on Friday night and then sing worship songs in church on a Sunday as if Friday night did not happen.

Likewise, it is okay to celebrate with a party but the purpose of the party should not be to get intoxicated. The purpose should be to express thanksgiving and build healthy relationships with others.

And, for Christians, there is nothing wrong with enjoying sex, so long as it is within a loving marriage relationship.

Worship is good too, but only worship of the living God. We must not put anything else in the place of God Almighty.

The point is, we need to abstain from self-indulgent excesses and instead replace that behavior with doing God’s will. This is more sustaining to our soul and more consistent with the life Jesus lived.     

Jesus famously went without food in the wilderness for 40 days. The rest of the time though he was quite happy to enjoy people’s hospitality and go to parties. Jesus abstained from lots of things during his life. He abstained from bitterness and revenge. He abstained from hypocrisy and deceit. He abstained from sex and bad language. Jesus had perfect control over himself – both his mind and his body. And there is a certain peace and empowerment that comes with that.

How was Jesus able to do this? In John 4, after speaking to the Samaritan woman at the well, Jesus’ disciples urged him to eat something. But the Lord said to them, I have food to eat that you know nothing about… My food is to do the will of him who sent me and to finish his work.

There is a fulfilment and meaning in doing what God wants us to do, which satisfies and sustains our soul, in a way that nothing else can.

Jesus was able to abstain from self-indulgent excess because he had the right attitude. His mind set was to obey the will of God for him, even when that meant suffering.

The other thing that helps us to do the will of God is accountability.

Accountability:

In the Match Fit TV series, the players underwent a special body scan at the beginning of their training to measure their body fat and metabolic age. Then at the end of the series, after they had trained for a couple of months, they had a second scan to see what difference the training had made. All of them improved to some degree or other. That second scan was their accountability.

They had another measure of accountability too; a fitness test known as the Bronco. With the Bronco players run shuttles of 20, 40 and then 60 meters. This set is repeated 5 times. The goal is to do this as quickly as possible.

If you are going to be on national TV, you don’t want to make a fool of yourself. When the day of accountability comes and they measure your visceral fat you want to have better stats than when you started. Same thing with the Bronco. When the day of accountability comes you want to have a faster time.

From verse 4 of chapter 4 we read:

They [that is, the pagans] think it strange that you do not plunge with them into the same flood of dissipation, and they heap abuse on you. 5 But they will have to give account to him who is ready to judge the living and the dead.

Notice the poetry in that phrase, flood of dissipation. It creates a connection with God’s judgement through the flood of Noah’s day.  

Many of Peter’s readers used to live a pagan lifestyle, complete with orgies and wild drinking parties. But when they were baptised and became Christians they stopped all that. As a consequence, they were ridiculed and verbally abused by their ex-drinking buddies.

As I said earlier, the pagan society of the first century had made a religion out of debauchery so, in their mind, Christians were bad citizens for not appeasing the gods and going along with their rituals. In fact, the pagans used to refer to Christians as ‘atheists’ because they refused to participate in the worship of the Roman & Greek gods.

Peter is saying that those who criticize and malign Christians will have to give account to the one who judges the living and the dead. In other words, everyone who has ever lived, past, present and future will be accountable to God Almighty for the way they have conducted themselves in this life.

Some will be vindicated by God (because of their loyalty to Jesus) and others will condemn themselves by the choices they have made.         

In verse 6 of chapter 4 Peter continues the theme of accountability where he writes: For this is the reason the gospel was preached even to those who are now dead,so that they might be judged according to human standards in regard to the body, but live according to God in regard to the spirit.

This is one of those bird’s nest verses, if you remember last week’s sermon. People have got themselves into all sorts of tangles trying to unpick the meaning here.

Some think this verse is talking about Jesus preaching the gospel to the dead so they can be saved. While that idea is attractive in some ways, it is not consistent with the teaching of Jesus and it is not what Peter is getting at here.

Let me explain. The pagans of Peter’s day could dismiss the Christian faith by saying that Christian believers died in the same way as unbelievers. So if everyone succumbs to the same fate (of physical death) then what is the point of suffering and abstaining from bodily pleasure as Christians do?

Good question. What is the point? The point is, this life is not all there is. Physical death is a kind of judgment but it is not the final judgment. Those Christians who are now dead might be judged by non-Christians to have wasted their lives. But actually death is not the last word for believers. Those people who are now dead, but who put their faith in Jesus while they were still alive, will one day be acquitted at the final judgement and raised to eternal life with Christ.

This might seem like old hat to us but it was welcome news for Peter’s readers. We need to remember that the death of Christians created a problem for the church in the time of the apostles. It made some people think those who died before Jesus returned had missed out on their reward. But that is not the case at all. The dead in Christ will be raised to life also. 

Peter probably had in mind the Wisdom of Solomon when he wrote verse 6. From chapter 3 of the Wisdom of Solomon we read:

“But the souls of the righteous are in the hand of God, and no torment will ever touch them. In the eyes of the foolish they seemed to have died, and their departure was thought to be a disaster, and their going from us to be their destruction; but they are at peace. For though in the sight of others they were punished, their hope is full of immortality. Having been disciplined a little, they will receive great good, because God tested them and found them worthy of himself…” [2]

In basic terms both Peter and the writer of the Wisdom of Solomon are saying:

The wicked wrongly think the death of the righteous is a punishment and so the righteous are no better off. What the wicked do not understand is the difficulties of the present are only temporary. Believers have a future hope of eternal life. [3]

Conclusion:

Peter’s triple AAA gospel not only offers the promise of heaven. It stands for something in this life as well: Attitude, Abstinence and Accountability.

Let me leave you with a couple of questions:

Which of the three A’s is most difficult for you?

And what do you think Jesus would suggest you do about that? 

Grace and peace be yours in abundance.

Questions for discussion or reflection:

What stands out for you in reading this Scripture and/or in listening to the sermon? Why do you think this stood out to you?

  • What attitude or mind-set do you face the world with? Is this working for you? How is your attitude similar to (or different from) the attitude Peter recommends in 4:1?
  • What examples do we see in the gospels of Jesus’ attitude to suffering and obedience to God?  How might we arm ourselves with the same attitude as Christ? How might we keep a healthy balance in our mind-set?
  • Why did the pagans of the first century ‘heap abuse’ on Christians? Why do we need to abstain from the vices Peter lists in 4:3? Why is moderation helpful to aim for?
  • In what sense is God’s judgement a source of hope for Christian believers?
  • What does Peter mean in 4:6? What first century issues / questions was Peter addressing in this verse?
  • Which of the three AAA’s (Attitude, Abstinence or Accountability) is most difficult for you? Why is this do you think? What little steps of improvement can you make in this area? 

[1] Refer Thomas Schreiner’s commentary on 1st Peter, page 201.

[2] Wisdom of Solomon 3:1-6.

[3] Refer Thomas Schreiner’s commentary on First Peter, page 209. 

Tawa Baptist

Reach

Scripture: 1st Peter 3:18-22

Structure:

  • Introduction
  • Righteousness & Atonement
  • Exaltation & Confidence
  • Conclusion – Humanity

Introduction:

Good morning everyone.

If you have ever been fishing with a rod and reel then you will know the importance of not getting your line in a tangle. If you let out the fishing line too quickly the nylon on the reel turns into a birds’ nest. When that happens you just have to slow down and let the line all the way out, until it is untangled, then wind it back up again.

Untangling fishing lines is good practice for brushing knots out of children’s hair and untangling your wife’s necklaces.

This morning we continue our series in first Peter, focusing on chapter 3, verses 18-22. This passage is a bit of birds’ nest. No disrespect to Peter but people throughout the centuries have got themselves into all sorts of knots trying to understand what Peter meant. Even the great reformer, Martin Luther, said he could not understand this passage. What may have been obvious to Peter’s first century audience is simply lost on us. So we approach this reading with humility, being honest about the limits of our knowledge.

From first Peter chapter 3, verses 18-22, we read…     

18 For Christ diedfor sins once for all,the righteous for the unrighteous, to bring you to God.He was put to death in the body but made alive in the Spirit. 19 through whom alsohe went and made proclamation to the spirits in prison 20 who disobeyed long ago when God waited patientlyin the days of Noah while the ark was being built. In it only a few people, eight in all, were savedthrough water, 21 and this water symbolizes baptism that now saves you also — not the removal of dirt from the body but the pledge of a good consciencetoward God. It saves you by the resurrection of Jesus Christ, 22 who has gone into heaven and is at God’s right hand — with angels, authorities and powers in submission to him.

May the Spirit of Jesus illuminate God’s word for us.

Just as it is important to avoid getting your fishing line in a tangle, so too we need to keep our thoughts in order when we read Scripture. To save any intellectual birds’ nests, the big idea of today’s message is: nothing is beyond Jesus’ reach. The victory and Lordship of Jesus is comprehensive in its scope, both in this world and in the spiritual realm. So that’s the headline: ‘Nothing is beyond Jesus’ reach.’

With that in mind, there are five things in today’s text that I want to draw your attention to, and they are all about Jesus. These verses speak of the righteousness of Christ, the exaltation of Christ, the atonement of Christ, the confidence we can have in Christ and the humanity of Christ.

Righteousness, Exaltation, Atonement, Confidence and Humanity. R.E.A.C.H. It spells reach. First let’s consider the righteousness of Christ and the atonement of Christ together – because they go hand in hand in Peter’s thought here.

Righteousness & Atonement:

Righteousness has to do with right relationship – acting with justice and kindness in our relationships with others. Loving God and loving our neighbour.

Atonement also has to do with relationship. In very simple terms, the meaning of atonement can be found in the syllables: At-one-ment. If we do something unrighteous (something unjust or unkind) in our relationship with another person, then the relationship is no longer one. It is damaged. Perhaps not broken into a thousand pieces but at least fractured, no longer whole.

For us to be in right relationship with that person again we must make atonement – we must do something to put the relationship right so we are at-one with that person.     

Let me illustrate what I mean. I have here a packet of biscuits from the kids’ Sunday school. This packet is unopened. It is one. It is whole. None of the biscuits are missing. But what if I were to open the packet and eat one or two of the biscuits?

Well, if I did that (and I’m not saying that I have) but if I did, then the packet of biscuits would not be one anymore. I could not, in good conscience, give the Flock Sunday school kids a half-eaten packet of biscuits. What would I need to do to make atonement in that situation do you think?

[Wait] That’s right. I would need to replace the biscuits. Then my relationship with the kids and my relationship with myself (my conscience) would be right again. It would be at-one and whole.   

Of course, replacing a packet of biscuits is an easy thing to atone for. But some things cannot be replaced. If you break someone’s heart or betray their trust or do something that cannot be undone, then it becomes far more difficult to put the relationship right again and atonement feels out of reach. Well, it might be out of reach for us but it is not out of reach for Jesus.  

In verse 18 of chapter 3 Peter writes: For Christ diedfor sins once for all,the righteous for the unrighteous, to bring you to God.

This verse is talking about the atonement Jesus made for humanity on the cross. Jesus was completely righteous in all his ways. He alone is the only human being to have lived a sinless life and so he alone is the only one who can atone for the rest of us who have sinned and cannot atone for ourselves.

In the Old Testament Jews would atone for their sins (they would replace the biscuits they had stolen) by sacrificing an animal, one without blemish, one that was whole and healthy. That was a ritual they had to keep repeating. It was like the atonement did not stick. It was only temporary. So righteousness, of a lasting kind, was always out of reach for them.

But Jesus died for sins once for all. The quality of his sacrifice was sufficient to atone for all sins through all time, so there is no need for any more animal sacrifices. Jesus does not just replace the packet of biscuits. He redeems the whole biscuit factory.

Jesus died for sins to bring us to God. You see, we have all broken trust with God. We have all done injury to God’s heart. We have all taken something that cannot be replaced. That’s the bad news. The good news is that Jesus’ death somehow makes us at-one with God again. Jesus’ death and resurrection brings right relationship, with God, within our reach.

Our salvation is not automatic though. While the atonement of Jesus is a permanent fix and while it does bring righteousness within reach, we still have to take hold of it by faith. And this is what Peter is getting at in verse 21 of chapter 3 when he talks about baptism:

…and this water symbolizes baptism that now saves you also — not the removal of dirt from the body but the pledge of a good consciencetoward God. It saves you by the resurrection of Jesus Christ,

Baptism is the ritual of Christian initiation. It is a beginning.  It is how we demonstrate we want to be a Christian. Baptism is a way of publicly saying, ‘I want to take hold of the righteousness that is now within my reach because of Jesus’ death and resurrection.’

Notice that it’s not just Jesus’ death which saves us but his resurrection also. Jesus’ death and resurrection go together. Baptism is a symbolic re-enactment or identification with Jesus’ death and resurrection. When we go down under the water we are saying, ‘my old way of life is now dead to me’. And when we rise up out of the water we are saying, ‘I pledge to live for righteousness.’

Peter wants to make it clear that it is not the ritual of baptism itself that saves us. The water is not magic. It is Jesus’ death & resurrection that saves. Baptism is a way of asking God (on the basis of the atonement Jesus made) to cleanse our conscience and forgive our sins.

Sometimes people put off being baptised because they feel like they are not good enough yet. Baptism is not a badge that says you’ve made it. It is a confession that says you are a sinner (you’ve eaten the biscuits and you can’t replace them) but you want to live for righteousness. So you don’t you have to be perfect in order to be baptised but you do need to be prepared to make a few changes to your lifestyle. Baptism does not mean business as usual.  

Okay, so we are talking about how nothing is out of reach for Jesus and he brings righteousness and atonement within reach for us.

In this morning’s reading Peter also focuses on the exaltation of Christ and the confidence this gives to Christian believers.

Exaltation & Confidence:

We live in a relatively egalitarian society here in New Zealand. One which is quite flat in terms of its social structure. No one likes to stick out too much. In some ways this is good. We enjoy a certain degree of equality; of being on an even footing with others. But the shadow side to this is tall poppy syndrome. Tall poppy syndrome is a phrase which means cutting people down who might succeed or rise above the rest.

New Zealand is not like other countries. We are less inclined to celebrate success and more inclined to criticize those who do well. Which sounds crazy, when you say it like that, but it’s true.

A couple of weeks ago a guy called Jay came and spoke to a group of Wellington Baptist pastors. Jay is the national coordinator for 24-7 youth work in New Zealand and he is also the founder of a movement called E Tū Tāngata.

E Tū Tāngata is a Maori term.  E Tū means stand and Tāngata means people. But it translates as Stand Together. E Tū Tāngata is about people standing up together against tall poppy syndrome. That means valuing ourselves and others. Not putting ourselves or others down.

When speaking to groups of people Jay often asks the question, ‘On a scale of 1 to 10 how would you rate yourself?’ (10 being absolutely amazing and 1 being not great). Most people say they are a 6 or 7, because they live in New Zealand and that’s the right answer in kiwi culture. We want to be just above average but not too far above the rest because then we will get cut down. 

The problem with tall poppy syndrome is that it infects our mind-set. It puts us on a downward mental spiral. Life is hard enough without being hard on ourselves too. We need to be on our own side.       

When the Bible talks about the exaltation of Christ it means the lifting up of Jesus. The exaltation of Christ includes his resurrection from the dead, his ascension to heaven and his enthronement at the right hand of God. Peter spells this out in verse 22 where he says:   

[You are] saved by the resurrection of Jesus Christ, 22 who has gone into heaven and is at God’s right hand — with angels, authorities and powers in submission to him.

Jesus’ exaltation makes him the tallest poppy around and in New Zealand culture that also makes him (and his followers) a target.  

As kiwis we might hear those verses about Jesus’ exaltation and think: Not sure I like that image of Jesus. I liked him better when he was washing feet and being a carpenter and rubbing shoulders with ordinary people. I liked him better when he was more on my level.

The truth is Jesus has always been a 10 and that’s okay. In fact, it is good news, because Jesus being better than us (his being perfect) is what brings righteousness and atonement within reach. God wants to raise us up. He wants us to realise that, in Christ, we are 10’s also.   

You know, tall poppy syndrome makes us blind and deaf to certain things. When we read that verse in the gospels where Jesus talks about loving your neighbour as you love yourself, we might hear, ‘I must love my neighbour and whenever I fail to love my neighbour I’m no good, I’m a 1 or a 2’. Something else to feel stink about.  

But we can be slow to hear the second part of what Jesus is saying there which is love yourself. Love in this context means to seek the well-being of your neighbour and yourself. We cannot sustain love for our neighbour out of an empty well. Loving yourself means taking care of your own needs. Not being self-indulgent but having grace for yourself. Not being too hard on yourself. Not letting your inner critic dictate a mantra of negative self-talk. 

The exaltation of Jesus is something for us to celebrate because it gives us confidence. Who do you want to see exalted? Who do you want to see in charge? Do you want someone who doesn’t know what they are doing? Who makes poor decisions and cannot be trusted? Or do you want someone who is wise and kind and just? Someone who is firm but fair, strong but also compassionate. I think we all want the latter. We want Jesus to be lifted up because he can be trusted. The exaltation of Christ gives us confidence. Confidence to reach for righteousness and peace. Confidence to love our neighbour as we love ourselves.     

Verses 19 and 20 of chapter 3 are among the most knotty in the Bible. This is where the birds’ nest often comes into play. Peter writes:

Jesus was… made alive in the Spirit. 19 through whom alsohe went and made proclamation to the spirits in prison 20 who disobeyed long ago when God waited patientlyin the days of Noah while the ark was being built. In it only a few people, eight in all, were savedthrough water,

Much ink has been spilt by scholars trying to understand these words. While we cannot fully comprehend exactly what Peter is saying here, the general gist seems to be that the exaltation of Christ gives Christian believers confidence.

Say whaaat? Let me explain.    

Peter says that Jesus made proclamation to the spirits in prison who disobeyed in the days of Noah. Who these spirits are and where the prison is exactly is disputed. I won’t confuse you with all the different theories but I will present you with the majority opinion among Bible experts today.

You may remember from the series on Noah, a few months ago, that the people of Noah’s day were so bad that God gave up on them and decided to start again with Noah and his family. It is thought that the spirits Peter refers to were the evil spiritual beings of Noah’s time who, according to Genesis 6, overstepped God’s boundaries by sleeping with human women.

In Jewish tradition these fallen angels were behind a lot of the bad stuff that happened in Noah’s day, so God locked them up in a prison somewhere in the spiritual realm. Jesus went to these spirits in prison to let them know he had conquered sin and death and so he is in charge. Sort of a victory speech.

The message to Peter’s readers is to be confident in their suffering for Christ because Jesus still reigns and rules. He has not surrendered believers to the power of evil forces. Jesus triumphed over all evil by his death & resurrection. By implication those who put their faith in Christ and share in his suffering will also share in his exaltation and reign with him. [1]

Suffering with and for Christ is a reason for confidence, because it is the path to exaltation.

Peter was comparing the fledgling church of the first Century to Noah and those with him in the ark. The Christians of Peter’s day were like Noah and his family; a small minority in a world that was hostile to them. But they could be confident that, like Noah, their future would be secure when the flood of God’s judgement came.

The fact that Jesus is exalted to the highest place means that nothing is out of reach for Jesus. As the psalmist says:

Where can I go from your Spirit? Where can I flee from your presence?
8 If I go up to the heavens, you are there;
    if I make my bed in the depths, you are there.
9 If I rise on the wings of the dawn, if I settle on the far side of the sea,
10 even there your hand will guide me, your right hand will hold me fast.    

Nothing is out of reach for Jesus.

Conclusion:

The H in our REACH acrostic stands for the humanity of Jesus. Verse 18 tells us Jesus was put to death in the body. This is a reference to Jesus’ humanity. Jesus had a physical body like us. He experienced the weakness of the flesh like we do. He understood hunger and pain and temptation. And he died as all people must. Jesus was fully human. He was not just a heavenly tourist on this earth.

The fact that Jesus is from heaven and is human means that he can bring the kingdom of heaven within reach for us. Jesus offers us his righteousness, his exaltation, his atonement, his confidence and his humanity.

May grace and peace be yours in abundance.

Questions for discussion or reflection:

What stands out for you in reading this Scripture and/or in listening to the sermon? Why do you think this stood out to you?

  • What is righteousness? What is atonement? How do we make (or find) atonement? Are there things in your life that you long to atone for?
  • How do we take hold of the righteousness and atonement that Christ offers?
  • On a scale of 1 to 10 how would you rate yourself? (10 being absolutely amazing and 1 being not great).  Why is that do you think? Would your private answer be different from your public answer? How so?
  • What is meant by the exaltation of Christ? Why is Jesus’ exaltation good news for us?
  • Why does Peter compare his readers to Noah and his family? In what ways was Noah’s situation parallel with Peter’s first century audience? In what ways is Noah’s situation parallel with ours?
  • What confidence do you take, personally, from Jesus’ exaltation and humanity?

[1] Refer Thomas Schreiner’s commentary on 1st Peter, page 198.

Tawa Baptist

Sanctuary

Scripture: 1st Peter 3:13-17

Structure:

  • Introduction
  • Sanctuary
  • Transparency
  • Conclusion

Introduction:

Good morning everyone.

Before we start I just want to say ‘thank you’ to the mystery person who put peanut brownie cookies in my letterbox last Monday. That was a winsome thing to do. They were delicious and I appreciated the connection with the sermon.

Today we continue our series in first Peter, focusing on chapter 3, verses 13-17. Part of the purpose of Peter’s letter is to encourage Christians who were suffering for their faith in Jesus. At the time Peter was writing, the church in Asia Minor was probably not subject to full on persecution but Christians were a marginalized minority, viewed with suspicion. There was social pressure to hide one’s faith in Christ. Believers were apparently misunderstood, maligned and slandered. In a culture where reputation was everything, the church’s reputation was getting a beating.

In today’s passage, and the verses that follow, Peter talks about how the Christian community is to handle itself in that context.

From 1st Peter chapter 3, verses 13-17, we read… 

13 Who is going to harm you if you are eager to do good? 14 But even if you should suffer for what is right, you are blessed. “Do not fear their threats; do not be frightened.” 15 But in your hearts revere Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hopethat you have. But do this with gentleness and respect, 16 keeping a clear conscience,so that those who speak maliciously against your good behavior in Christ may be ashamed of their slander. 17 For it is better, if it is God’s will,to suffer for doing good than for doing evil.  

May the Spirit of Jesus illuminate God’s word for us.

Two words which give us a handle on this passage are sanctuary and transparency. We are to find sanctuary in Christ and we are to be transparent (or open) about our hope in Jesus.   

Sanctuary:

Last Monday, while someone was putting peanut brownie biscuits in my letterbox, I was at Zealandier, also known as the Karori Bird Sanctuary. As most of you probably know Zealandier has a special fence around it to keep predators out. The idea is to provide a secure environment which is attractive to birds. One which is filled with the kinds of trees native birds like to feed off.

In some ways Zealandier is to native birds what Christ is to Christians. Just as native birds find sanctuary at Zealandier, so too we Christian believers find our sanctuary, our security, our home and our nourishment in Christ. To be a Christian is to be in Christ. We thrive in Christ, just like native birds thrive in the Karori Sanctuary and just like branches thrive when connected to the vine.   

In verse 13, of chapter 3, Peter says: Who is going to harm you if you are eager to do good?

There is sanctuary, there is security, in doing good. If you do something bad, something which is outside of a Christian lifestyle, then you invite unnecessary risk and harm into your life. Sort of like a bird that chooses to make its nest outside Zealandier invites the threat of cats and other predators.   

In verse 14 Peter goes on to say: But even if you should suffer for what is right, you are blessed.

These words echo the teaching of Jesus in Matthew 5:10 where the Lord says: Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

It might seem contradictory to us that we are blessed if we suffer for doing what is right, because suffering for any reason does not feel good, it hurts. Being blessed is not measured by a subjective feeling though. Being blessed is an objective state of being.

If someone asks you to do something difficult it is actually a complement. It says, ‘I trust you to handle it.’ And that’s how Peter sees it.  For him it is a privilege, or a sign of God’s favour, to suffer for Christ (if that is God’s will).

Verse 16 also picks up the idea of finding sanctuary in doing good. Peter writes about, keeping a clear conscience,so that those who speak maliciously against your good behavior in Christ may be ashamed of their slander.

It is never pleasant to be the subject of rumour and malicious talk. It feels unfair and something in us wants to cry out, ‘It’s not true’. But we know that the louder we protest in our own defence, the more guilty we appear. As Shakespeare wrote in Hamlet: ‘The lady doth protest too much, me thinks’.

We heard last week that true humility means not responding to people’s insults but trusting God to vindicate us. One sanctuary, or safe place we take refuge in, when we are slandered, is a clear conscience. We can find strength and security in knowing we are not guilty of the things our adversaries accuse us of.

We also find sanctuary in the knowledge that God is just and all knowing. He will defend us in his good time. That’s what Peter means when he talks about his readers’ enemies being ashamed of their slander. It’s not that we wish our enemies to be embarrassed. Rather, we want the truth to win out in the end, because the truth is in everyone’s interests.

Following this train of thought, verse 17 reads: For it is better, if it is God’s will,to suffer for doing good than for doing evil.  

Peter’s point is that his readers’ present suffering, for doing good, is not a sign of God’s punishment or displeasure but rather a sign of his blessing, his favour. If we suffer for the sake of righteousness, we stand to receive a reward.   

From the second part of verse 14 Peter says: “Do not fear their threats; do not be frightened.” 15 But in your hearts revere Christ as Lord.

This is a reference to Isaiah 8, where the Lord (Yahweh) says to the prophet:

12 “Do not call conspiracy everything this people calls a conspiracy;
do not fear what they fear, and do not dread it. 13 The Lord Almighty is the one you are to regard as holy, he is the one you are to fear, he is the one you are to dread. 14 and he will be a sanctuary;

In the context of Isaiah 8, the people of Judah were afraid of being invaded and overrun by their enemies. But the Lord’s message to Isaiah was, do not be afraid like the people. I, the Lord God Almighty, am in control. Fear me. Revere me. Regard me as holy and I will be a sanctuary for you. 

Peter’s first century readers may have been tempted to give in to fear of their neighbours. After all the Christian church was vulnerable; it was a marginalised minority in a potentially hostile environment. Peter’s message to them is do not be afraid of your pagan neighbours. The Lord Jesus is in control. Revere him. Notice how Peter equates Jesus with Yahweh, the Lord.  Peter is saying that Jesus is our sanctuary.  

To revere Jesus as Lord, in our heart, is to keep Jesus in the center of our lives – to orientate our whole lives around Christ and his teaching.  

There is a Baptist pastor from the South Island by the name of Andy Edwards who has worked in pastoral ministry for 30 years. Andy writes, “My biggest desire, which is my biggest challenge, is being ‘present’ to God, myself and others… and in this journey I have found slowing down and stillness to be the precondition of presence.”  

Stillness is the precondition of presence. I like that.

When I was at Zealandia last Monday, I found myself on the top of a ridge on the Lakeview Track, which overlooks the upper dam. As often happens in the bush I could hear many birds all around but I could not see any. So I sat down on a bench beside a couple of feeding stations. Just sat quietly in stillness, not really expecting anything to happen.

Within two minutes a male saddleback and a male bell bird turned up and started feeding on the sugar water. (You can tell the males because they usually have brighter feathers than the females, which is sort the opposite of the human species.) These birds were about a meter away and they stopped there to feed for a good five minutes, although I wasn’t really keeping track of the time. It was a beautiful moment; a moment of genuine sanctuary.

To revere Christ in our hearts includes being present to Jesus, present to ourselves and present to others. Stillness is the precondition of presence. Now obviously we cannot be still all the time. Much of the time life requires us to be active and on the move. But we need to stop and be still sometimes in order to revere Christ and be present to him.

Fear, anxiety, worry, conspiracy, these are the predators that rob the human soul of stillness. When we revere Jesus in our hearts, we find sanctuary from fear and a certain stillness for our soul, so that we may be nourished by the presence of God.

Transparency:

Zealandier is not like a zoo. It is not a cage where the birds are trapped inside. There is a fence to keep rats and cats and possums out but there is no roof to keep the birds in. Zealandier is transparent. It is open to the public and the birds are free to come and go as they please. The transparency of the sanctuary actually encourages native bird life in the greater Wellington area. 

Being in Christ is like being in a sanctuary that has a definite boundary fence or code of conduct, but it also has a gate to give access to the public and it has no roof, it is open to be shared.  

In verse 15, after having told his readers to revere Christ as Lord, Peter writes: Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hopethat you have. But do this with gentleness and respect…

So far, throughout this series, we have heard Peter encouraging his readers to be a winsome witness and let their distinctive Christian lifestyle do the talking. Here, in verse 15, Peter says be prepared to speak words of explanation as well.

The idea is that we Christians are to be open and transparent about our hope in Jesus. We are not to push our beliefs down people’s throats. (That would not be respectful or gentle.) Nor are we to keep our faith locked away like an animal in a cage. Rather we are to be prepared to speak when invited.

Peter had to learn this the hard way. On the night when Jesus was betrayed and arrested Peter was not prepared. He was standing outside warming himself by the fire when those with him asked if he was with Jesus. Sadly, Peter denied this three times without gentleness or respect.

But Peter found redemption. Later, after Jesus’ resurrection, when Peter was brought before the same Council who condemned Jesus, Peter was prepared to speak words of reason, with gentleness and respect. 

Okay, so what might you say if someone asks you why you are a Christian? Well, I’m not going to give you a script to follow. It does not work to recite someone else’s words. That just sounds like a telemarketer trying to sell you something. What we say has to be real and genuine. You have to find your own words and your own way of getting the message across.

With these things in mind, try to remember this acrostic. L.O.V.E. Love. Love is the main point of the gospel message. Jesus came to show us God’s love.

L stands for listen. Love listens. If someone wants to have a conversation about your Christian faith, then try to listen to what they are really saying. Listening is both respectful and gentle. Listening earns us the right to be heard and it helps us to understand the other person better.

Which brings us to the O in ourL.O.V.E. acrostic. O stands for others. If someone asks you to give account for the hope you have, you need to understand it’s not about you, it’s about them. What do they need from this conversation? We learn what others need by listening and asking questions.

What you say does not need to be long but it does need to be clear. Don’t use Christian jargon or big theological words that make the other person feel small. Because that is not gentle or respectful and it does not communicate God’s love. The Christian faith is reasonable. It is logical. It makes sense. Put yourself in the other person’s shoes and ask, ‘what sense are they making of what I’m saying?’.

V is for vulnerable. Make yourself vulnerable, without going overboard, and without making anyone else vulnerable. Do not speak down to the person. Do not patronize. Come alongside. Share from your heart as much as is helpful. There is a risk with sharing something deeply personal, like our hope in Jesus. We risk rejection.

But that is the way of Christ. Jesus did not coerce people. He challenged people, yes. And his words disturbed people. But he spoke from a place of vulnerability. He did it without defending himself, with his arms open and his heart exposed.

There is a certain stillness in making ourselves vulnerable for the sake of the other person. Even when people cannot understand the content of what we are saying, if we say it with vulnerability, so that the other person knows they are standing on holy ground, a feeling of stillness settles on the conversation and a door to God’s presence is opened.

E is for experience. When it comes to sharing your faith, experience is your friend. People cannot argue with your experience. I like to talk about the goodness of God and the meaning God gives to life because that is real in my experience. One of the reasons I am a Christian is because Jesus makes this world a better place. He makes ugly things (ugly situations) beautiful.

He makes pain bearable.

He comes alongside me when I am lonely and shows me his scars so that, without words, I know I am understood. I am not alone.

He does not lie to me and, for those who have been let down and lied to a lot, that is huge. That is gold.

There is a purity to Jesus that I love and am terrified of at the same time.

These are my words. You need to find your own words based on your experience of God.

When you are in a conversation think L.O.V.E. Start by listening. Remember it is not about you. It is about the other person. Be prepared to make yourself vulnerable but not too vulnerable. Share don’t scare. And speak from your own experience.  

So how might we prepare ourselves then? How might we find the words we need to articulate our hope?

We need to take time daily to soak in the Scriptures and be present to what the Holy Spirit might be saying.

We also need to think about our faith and sometimes to wrestle with the gnarly bits. When you boil it all down, what is it you actually believe to be true in simple language.

And how does that square with the Scriptures, with your own experience and the experience of other believers?

In verse 15, when Peter talks about the hopeyou have… the you is plural, not singular. So it is both your hope personally and our hope collectively. Hearing what other Christians believe and how they have made sense of the gnarly bits helps us in forming what we believe. You don’t have to reinvent the wheel. You don’t have to figure it all out on your own. But you do have to own it. It has to be real for you and that takes a process.  

Hope here refers to future salvation. Hope therefore is having faith (or trust) that, even though the present may be difficult, we have something good to look forward to in the future.

That hope may be the hope of resurrection and seeing Jesus face to face.

It may be the hope of being reunited with loved ones who have passed on.

It could be the hope of seeing justice done, of God vindicating the righteous and righting wrongs

It may the hope of seeing a friend or family member share our faith in Christ

Or it may be the hope of being set free from the limitations and burdens and pain we carry in this life.

You know the hope you carry inside you. You know the hope that carries you.

I do not pretend to be good at hope. Like Jonah I tend to think the worst. But, like Jonah, I also know God is more gracious than I am. Which is why God does not quit me and I cannot quit him. And so I find hope in God’s character, his goodness.   

We are talking about the need to be transparent about our faith; to be open about our hope in Jesus. Those of us who were at the church forum last Wednesday saw a wonderful example of transparent hope when Katie & Dan shared with us their sense of call to become youth pastors.

Dan & Katie were quite open with us about the journey they are on. This openness (this transparency) created a moment of stillness, I felt. There were a couple of things Dan said in particular, which I won’t share with you because it is Dan’s story and it is for him to share. But the gentleness and respect and vulnerability with which they shared created a stillness which opened the door to presence. I have asked Dan & Katie to share with us next Sunday morning.

Conclusion:

We started today’s message hearing about the situation of Peter’s first century readers, how they were misunderstood, maligned and socially marginalised. Our situation in 21st Century New Zealand is not identical to theirs but there is some overlap.

The church in New Zealand today is not persecuted but we are aware of a growing disconnect between what Christians believe and what the wider society, we live in, believes. I don’t think we have it as hard as some of Peter’s readers did but we also do not have it as easy as we once did. It seems Peter’s letter is becoming more and more relevant to us.

We need to maintain our sanctuary in Christ. And that means taking time to be still and wait for the presence of Jesus.

We also need to be transparent about our hope in Christ. And that means being prepared to speak with words of love.   

Let’s stand now and sing, Jesus, be the center…

Questions for discussion or reflection:

What stands out for you in reading this Scripture and/or in listening to the sermon? Why do you think this stood out to you?

  • What was the situation of Peter’s first century readers? How is that similar (or different) from our situation today?
  • What practical things can we do to find and maintain sanctuary in Christ?
  • Why do we need to take time to be still? How does stillness help us to be present to God, ourselves and others? Do you have regular patterns of stillness in your weekly routine? If not, what would need to change to create space for stillness?
  • Why do we need to be transparent about our hope in Christ?
  • What would you say if someone asked you to talk about the reason for your hope?  
  • Discuss / reflect on the L.O.V.E. acrostic. Which aspects do you need to work on? (e.g. listening, others, vulnerability, experience.)
Tawa Baptist

Blessing

Scripture: 1st Peter 3:8-12

Structure:

  • Introduction
  • Defined by character
  • Defined by blessing
  • Conclusion

Introduction:

Good morning everyone.

What would you say defines a banana cake? [Wait]

That’s right – a banana cake is defined by bananas. It is made out of bananas and as a consequence its very character, its smell and taste, is banana-ish.

What about a custard square – what defines a custard square? [Wait]

That’s right – custard. Take the custard out of a custard square and it is no longer a custard square, it’s just a piece of pastry. Keep the custard and it does not matter what shape the pastry is, it is still a custard square.

What about a Christian – what defines a Christian? [Wait]

That’s right – Christ. A Christian is defined by Jesus. If a person stops walking in the way of Christ, they are no longer Christian. But how might we define the way of Christ?

Today we continue our series in first Peter, focusing on chapter 3, verses 8-12. In this passage Peter talks about some of the things that define the way of Jesus and therefore are characteristic of Christians. From verse 8 we read…

8 Finally, all of you, be like-minded, be understanding, love one another as brothers, be compassionate and humble-minded. 9 Do not repay evil with evilor insult with insult. On the contrary, repay evil with blessing, because to thisyou were called so that you may inherit a blessing.

10 For, “Whoever would love life and see good days must keep their tongue from evil and their lips from deceitful speech. 11 They must turn from evil and do good; they must seek peace and pursue it. 12 For the eyes of the Lord are on the righteous and his ears are attentive to their prayer, but the face of the Lord is against those who do evil.”

May the Spirit of Jesus illuminate God’s word for us.

In these verses we learn what defines a Christian. We are defined by our distinctive Christ-like character and we are defined by blessing. First let us consider what a Christ-like character smells and tastes like.  

Defined by character:

In my hand here I have a Griffin’s Vanilla Wine biscuit. Vanilla Wines are a plain round biscuit with a distinctive smell and taste. They remind me of my Nana. Often when we went to visit she would put some Vanilla Wine biscuits out for us to eat.

It’s not that my Nana did not do her own baking. She made amazing peanut brownie cookies but I’ve never found a peanut brownie biscuit that tastes just like hers. Fortunately, Griffins have not changed their Vanilla Wine recipe so whenever I want to remember my Nana I simply smell and taste a Vanilla Wine biscuit.  

Character refers to the mental and moral qualities distinctive to a person or community. Character therefore refers to the inner substance of a person or group. Not their physical substance but their moral substance. Character is the seed bed of speech and behavior.

In considering what Christ-like character smells and tastes like, Peter lists five character traits for Christians. In verse 8 we read: …all of you, be like-minded, be understanding, love one another as brothers, be compassionate and humble-minded.    

Notice that Peter starts by saying all of you. In contemporary Western society we tend to think of character in individual terms. But Peter is writing in a cultural context which is more collective in its way of thinking. So these five mental and moral characteristics apply to all Christian believers, both individually and collectively as a community of faith.    

The first moral quality by which Christian character is defined is like-mindedness. Like-mindedness implies working together with other Christians as part of a team or family and not acting in isolation. Like-mindedness also refers to sharing a common heritage and ethical tradition. [1]

Some translations paraphrase the word like-minded as harmony, which provides a lovely image. The church is a bit like an orchestra made up of different people playing different instruments but all playing in a like-minded or harmonious way.

The thing that makes an orchestra like-minded is playing from the same musical score and following the same conductor. In a similar way, the thing that makes the Christian community like-minded is reading the same Bible and following the same example of Jesus Christ.

Closely related to being like-minded is having understanding for one another. Understanding on both an emotional level and an intellectual level. Being happy for people when things go well for them and being supportive of them when life is tough. Understanding requires us to see things from the other person’s point of view and ask ourselves the question; if I was in their shoes what would I find most helpful?

So for example: if the person in question has a problem with alcohol then understanding requires that we don’t buy them a bottle of wine for Christmas.

Or if someone has been abused as a child then understanding might mean not imposing a hug on them because you know they don’t like to be touched.

Or if a couple are not able to have children then understanding means not complaining about your kids keeping you awake at night.

Or if you are a married woman and you have a female friend who is on their own then understanding might mean going on a girls’ night out, rather than inviting your single friend to dinner with lots of couples. You get the idea.

The third character quality that Peter mentions is brotherly love. This comes right in the center of the five virtues, which might indicate it is the most important.

Some more modern translations take out the word brotherly and say ‘love one another’. They do this to appear more gender neutral, more inclusive. But the original text uses the expression brotherly love and when we remove key words in translation we risk watering down the meaning of the text. Brotherly love does not exclude women in any way. As we heard a couple of weeks ago, with the section on instructions to wives, Peter is not writing to men only.

The point is the kind of love Christians are to have for one another is the love that one has for family, for blood relations. We tend to put up with more from family members because they are family. The bond between family members is stronger somehow than other relationships. By using the term brotherly love Peter is saying the church is a spiritual family. So the bond between Christian believers should be at least as strong as the bond between blood relations.

The Hebrew word for love is closely related to the Hebrew word to give. Therefore, in Jewish thought, to love is to give. [2]

Let me share with you a traditional folk story that illustrates brotherly love well.          

Once therewere two brothers who lived in two villages and shared the land between them. Every year they would divide the harvest.

During one abundant year the older brother, who was married and had many children, was worried about his younger brother who did not have a family. Who would support him in his old age? In the middle of the night, the older brother secretly brought some grain to his brother’s storehouse, but when he woke up in the morning he still had exactly the same amount of grain that he had the night before.

The younger brother was also worried: How will my older brother support all his children? So, the younger brother decided to secretly travel to his brother’s storehouse and place some grain of his own inside, but in the morning, he discovered that he still had exactly the same amount of grain as he had before he gave any away.

This went on for two nights until on the third night, the two brothers met as each one was on the way to the other’s storehouse carrying grain. At once, they both understood what had happened and they embraced in brotherly love.

In Jewish folklore it is said that God decided the ground where the two brothers met would be the site of His holy temple. I’m not sure if that is historically accurate but it certainly contains some beautiful truths. Those brothers were defined by like-mindedness, understanding, love and compassion.

Compassion is the fourth word Peter uses to define the Christian believer and community.  In Biblical thought compassion is a strong gut feeling which moves someone to act in kindness for someone else’s well-being. The classic story of compassion is Jesus’ parable of the good Samaritan.

You know the one; where a man is beaten up by robbers and left for dead on the side of the road. A priest and a Levite each, in turn, see the wounded man and pass by without stopping to help. But when a despised Samaritan sees the man in need, he has compassion on the stranger. And his compassion moves him to stop and care for the man’s wounds. Then the Samaritan puts the man on his own donkey and carries him to an inn to recover, paying the expenses himself.     

One of the finer points of Jesus’ parable of the Samaritan is that the wounded stranger had been stripped of his clothes. And in that culture the clothes a person wore identified which race and religion they belonged to. So without seeing any clothes it was impossible for the Samaritan to know who he was helping. It could have been a Jewish enemy.

The point is compassion is blind when it comes to matters of race and religion. Some of you may sponsor children through World Vision or Tear Fund. Although both of these organizations are Christian, some of the communities they support through child sponsorship are not Christian. But that does not matter. As Christian organizations, World Vision and Tear Fund are not defined by the communities they help. No, they are defined by compassion.

Now in saying that compassion is blind to race & religion, I do not mean to imply that Christian compassion is stupid or unthinking. The exercise of Christ-like compassion requires wisdom and discernment.

Being compassionate makes us a target for deceitful people. You would not believe the number of scam emails we receive in the church office. If you try and help everyone who presents some kind of need, you will quickly destroy your capacity to remain compassionate.   

With this in mind, there are three basic questions we should ask ourselves when we come across someone in need:

Firstly, what is the real need here?

Secondly, is it in my power to help this person?

And thirdly, will my helping this person put other vulnerable people at risk?

The Samaritan in Jesus’ parable could see there was a real need. There was a man bleeding out on the side of the road. It was a life and death situation.  

It was also in the Samaritan’s power to help the injured man. It probably was not convenient but he did have the resources to save the man’s life.

And thirdly, the Samaritan helped the wounded stranger in a way that did not put other vulnerable people at risk. There may have been some risk to the Samaritan himself, but there was no risk to anyone else.  

If someone drives up to you in a Lexus and asks for money for petrol, you have to ask yourself, ‘What’s the real need here?’ Because it is probably not money. It’s not likely to be a life & death situation.

Or if a complete stranger, who is sleeping rough, wants a bed for the night then you might ask yourself, do I have the resources to pay for a motel room for them? If you have a wife and children at home, then it would be unwise to let the stranger stay in your house because it would put your family at risk.

Jesus said, ‘Do not put your pearls before swine.’ In other words, do not offer things of value to those who will treat them with contempt. Be discerning about how you spend the pearls of your compassion.      

Being humble-minded is the fifth virtue defining the followers of Christ. Humility was not considered a virtue in Greco-Roman society, although it was a virtue in Jewish culture. In the first century, humility was regarded as a sign of weakness and shame, because it meant an inability to defend your own honour. Only those of degraded social status were humble. [3]     

Another finer point from Jesus’ parable, in Luke 10, is the way the Samaritan puts the wounded stranger on his own donkey to carry him. This shows that the Samaritan was humble-minded. In that culture, the person riding the donkey had greater status than the person walking beside the donkey. The Samaritan gave up his status for the man in need by carrying him on his donkey. 

We kiwis may be tempted to think we are the very picture of humility, but I’m not sure we are. In the Christian sense of the word, a truly humble person does not attempt to defend their personal honour. When insulted, a truly humble person forgives the offence and trusts in God to vindicate them.  

Jesus was humble-minded. He had the power to defend his honour but he chose not to and instead embraced the shame of the cross, trusting God to glorify himself.

Like-mindedness, understanding, brotherly love, compassion and humility. These are some of the essential character qualities that define Christians. Put those virtues together and you have a Vanilla Wine biscuit that reminds people of Jesus.

Having outlined how his readers are defined by Christ-like character (in verse 8), Peter goes on (in verses 9-12) to discuss how we are defined by blessing. 

Defined by blessing:

Our church’s mission statement summarizes our purpose: We are to glorify God and be a blessing to his world. Christians are defined by blessing. We are both the recipients of God’s blessing and the agents of God’s blessing to others.

Verse 9 reads: Do not repay evil with evilor insult with insult. On the contrary, repay evil with blessing, because to thisyou were called so that you may inherit a blessing.

These words resonate with the teaching of Jesus who instructed his disciples to love their enemies and to bless those who curse you.

The temptation when we are maligned or insulted is to exaggerate the offence in our own mind and use the hurt as fuel for getting our own back against the one who has insulted our honour. But a tit for tat response allows our enemies to set the agenda and define us. As difficult as it is, in the heat of the moment, we need to hold on to who we are. We need to remember that we are not defined by insult and grievance. We are defined by blessing.

What then does Peter mean by blessing? Well, a blessing can be in word or deed. When we speak well of others, publicly, we are blessing them. Or when we ask God to show favour to someone, we are invoking God’s blessing on them. Of course, words of blessing that are not substantiated by deeds of blessing tend to sound a bit thin.

The story is told of a Christian soldier living in a barracks with his unit. Each evening, when he read his Bible and prayed before going to bed, he was insulted and verbally abused by one of the other soldiers opposite him.

One night a pair of muddy combat boots came flying across the room at the Christian. The next morning, the hostile soldier found his boots at the foot of his bed, cleaned and polished and ready for inspection. Several soldiers in his company eventually became Christians as a result of the winsome witness of this one Christ follower who returned blessing for insult. [4]

In this situation the Christian soldier did not allow himself to be defined by his antagonist. He was defined by blessing. God had shown him grace and so he passed this grace on to his enemy. 

In verses 10-12 of chapter 3 Peter provides some Old Testament support for what he is saying by quoting from Psalm 34. Psalm 34, as a whole, focuses on suffering and the Lord’s deliverance of those who are afflicted. Peter chose Psalm 34 because it speaks to the same sorts of issues faced by Peter’s first century readers.

Psalm 34 is attributed to king David who spent some time in exile with the Philistines. David was on the run from king Saul and had to hide in a pagan society, surrounded by people who were hostile to him.

David’s situation was a fitting parallel to the situation of Peter’s readers, who also lived in a pagan society, surrounded by people who viewed them with suspicion if not outright contempt.

Just as God delivered David from his exile among the Philistines, God will deliver Christians from their afflictions caused by their faith in Jesus. [5]

Verses 10-11 of chapter 3, outline the pathway (or lifestyle) of blessing…

For, “Whoever would love life and see good days must keep their tongue from evil and their lips from deceitful speech. 11 They must turn from evil and do good; they must seek peace and pursue it.

The wisdom here is that our words and deeds need to be in line. We don’t want to be bad talking someone behind their back and then nice to their face. Our words and deeds need to be positive & consistent, both in private and in public.

In the world we live in, speech and words have become a bit cheap. We often say things we don’t mean and swearing and cursing is common place. It’s like we imagine our words don’t matter. But it has been scientifically proven that the things we say to ourselves and to others have a very real effect in shaping our brain and thought patterns.   

We need to watch what we say because, if our speech is deceitful, we will end up believing a lie.

I have mentioned before that Robyn has an acrostic she uses with her class. T.H.I.N.K. – think before you speak. Is it true? Is it helpful? Is it inspiring? Is it necessary? Is it kind? If the answer is yes, say it. Otherwise think a bit more.

The idea that we must seek peace and pursue it indicates that peace does not simply find us as we sit quietly in a room. Peace requires some effort, some pursuit. Specifically, the effort of acting justly. There is no peace without justice. We cannot control how other people might act but we can control our own actions.    

Jesus’ command to love our enemies does not refer to an emotional feeling. You do not necessarily have to like your enemies. Enemy love means acting justly and kindly towards our adversaries, regardless of the emotions we may feel, and that’s where the effort in pursuing peace comes in. It takes real strength of character and divine energy to go against the grain of what we are feeling and love our enemies. 

I was at the Dentist recently, sitting in the waiting room, and I saw a newspaper article warning against the use of mouth wash. Research has found that we need a diversity of bacteria in our mouth, in order to maintain good oral health. Apparently mouth wash tends to reduce the diversity of bacteria.

This made me think of a parallel with our reading of Scripture. Sometimes we apply a kind of mental mouthwash to the Bible. We can be tempted to sanitize the Scriptures, by reading selectively to remove the parts we don’t like or that sound a bit harsh or offensive or out of date.

For example, we might tend to steer away from the passages that talk about God’s judgement and anger and justice because that makes us feel uncomfortable or embarrassed or fearful. But if we remove the justice and judgment of God from our Bible reading, then we will find it very difficult to believe in the goodness of God as well. And if we lose faith in the goodness of God we won’t be able to repay insult with blessing.

Verse 12 of 1st Peter 3 concludes the quote from Psalm 34…

For the eyes of the Lord are on the righteous and his ears are attentive to their prayer, but the face of the Lord is against those who do evil.”

This verse alludes to the justice and judgement of God. We might be tempted to sanitize it by removing the part about the face of the Lord being against those who do evil. But actually we need to hold on to that because it tells us our doing good in response to evil is not in vain. God, who is just, will not tolerate evil indefinitely. There is a reckoning for those who insult others without just cause.

Conclusion:

This morning we have heard what defines the followers of Jesus. We are defined by our distinctive Christ-like character and we are defined by blessing.

The ideals Peter holds up here are not easy to attain. If we spent too long measuring how far we fall short, we might become discouraged and give up. Loving our enemies takes some heavy lifting, it is hard work.

Two things to bear in mind. Firstly, God is on your side. He wants to bless you. He wants to see you succeed in overcoming evil with good. If (or when) we slip up, God is gracious and willing to forgive, provided we are honest and willing to repent. 

Which brings us to the second thing. The perfection of our character is not achieved in a day. So think marathon, not sprint. Pace yourself. Break it down into manageable pieces. Take little steps in the right direction, every day, and stay the course. By God’s grace, and through the power of His Spirit, you will get there in the end.   

Let us pray…

Loving Father, we thank you for your goodness, your justice and mercy.

Save us from the time of trial and deliver us from evil we ask.

Help us to remember who we are in Christ.

Help us to be like-minded, working in harmony with other Christian believers.

Help us to be understanding, quick to see things from the other person’s point of view.

Help us to demonstrate brotherly love, for by this will all people know that we are Jesus’ disciples.

Help us to be compassionate, in a wise and discerning way, not wasting our pearls but making them count for your glory.

Help us to be humble, not quick to defend our own honour when we are insulted, but ready to embrace the shame of carrying our cross, in faith that you will vindicate us, if not in this life then at the day of judgement.

Save us from giving in to the temptation of being defined by our enemies.

Help us instead, Lord, to love our enemies and to repay evil with a blessing.

We thank you for the blessing of eternal life that is promised to those who trust and obey Jesus. Amen.  

Questions for discussion or reflection:

What stands out for you in reading this Scripture and/or in listening to the sermon? Why do you think this stood out to you?

  • How does Peter define the Christian community in chapter 3, verses 8-12?
  • Discuss / reflect on the five character virtues Peter lists in verse 8. How might you apply each of these in your context?
  • Which of Peter’s five character virtues do you find hardest to practice? What small steps could you take to become more Christ-like in this aspect of your character?
  • Which Christian character qualities do we see in Jesus’ parable of the good Samaritan? What three questions should we ask to help us spend our compassion wisely?
  • Why do you think Jesus taught his disciples to bless those who curse them? Can you think of a time (from your own experience) when someone repaid an insult with a blessing? What happened?
  • How might you be a blessing to those around you? (Whether they be friend or foe.)
  • Take some time this week to audit what you say. How much of what you say is true, helpful, inspiring, necessary and kind?

[1] Karen Jobes, 215

[2] https://www.ifcj.org/learn/holy-land-moments/daily-devotionals/brotherly-love-2/

[3] J.H. Elliot, 605.

[4] Refer Karen Jobes’ commentary on 1st Peter, page 218.

[5] Karen Jobes, page 223.

Tawa Baptist

Beauty

Scripture: 1st Peter 3:1-7

Structure:

  • Introduction
  • Wives (beautiful submission)
  • Husbands (knowledgeable respect)
  • Conclusion

Introduction:

Good morning everyone.

Language has a strange way of evolving over time. What a word or phrase meant several centuries ago can be completely different in today’s usage.

Take the word ‘nice’, for example. In the 1300’s nice meant silly or foolish or ignorant. Then, by the 1500’s the word nice had evolved to mean meticulous, attentive or sharp. These days though the word nice just means agreeable or pleasant.  

The word ‘meat’ has also changed. In old English meat described any kind of solid food (as opposed to drink) for humans or animals. So bread was meat, as were apples or hay. These days though meat has narrowed in its meaning to refer to the flesh of animals eaten by people. A piece of steak or a kranksy is meat.   

Today we continue our series in 1st Peter, focusing on chapter 3, verses 1-7. Zooming out to look at the bigger picture, Peter is giving instructions on how Christians are to relate with those around them, in particular unbelievers.

In this morning’s passage, Peter addresses the relationship between wives and husbands, with a special shout out to those Christian wives who have non-Christian husbands.

Some of the words and phrases in this passage might make a 21st Century western audience cringe. Before we pass judgment on the political correctness of the language though, let’s remember that the nuance and meaning of words evolves over time. The way we hear this reading is quite different from way a first Century Middle Eastern audience would have heard it.

From 1st Peter, chapter 3, verses 1-7 we read…       

Wives, in the same way submit yourselves to your own husbandsso that, if any of them do not believe the word, they may be won overwithout words by the behavior of their wives, 2 when they see the purity and reverence of your lives. 3 Your beauty should not come from outward adornment, such as elaborate hairstyles and the wearing of gold jewelry or fine clothes. 4 Rather, it should be that of your inner self,the unfading beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit, which is of great worth in God’s sight.

5 For this is the way the holy women of the past who put their hope in Godused to adorn themselves. They submitted themselves to their own husbands, 6 like Sarah, who obeyed Abraham and called him her master. You are her daughters if you do what is right and do not give way to fear.

7 Husbands, in the same way be considerate as you live with your wives, and treat them with respect as the weaker vessel and as heirs with you of the gracious gift of life, so that nothing will hinder your prayers.

May the Spirit of Jesus illuminate God’s word for us.

One of the things we notice with this reading is that Peter’s instruction to wives takes up six verses, whereas his instruction to husbands only takes one verse. Why do wives get so much more attention than husbands? Well, two reasons…

Firstly, women were among the most vulnerable and powerless in first century society. Peter is saying that his Christian readers (both male and female) were like women, socially speaking: they were relatively vulnerable and powerless. The instructions he gives to wives here contain principles which apply to all Christian believers regardless of their gender or marital status. So if you are single or a man you still need to pay attention to what Peter is saying to wives because it is relevant to you as well.    

Secondly, Peter wants to affirm and empower Christian women. Peter wants his readers to understand and recognize the valuable role women have in witnessing for Christ and the gospel. Women are not just along for the ride.

If we were to sum up Peter’s instructions to wives (and by extension to all Christians) then it might be something like, practice beautiful submission.  

Wives – beautiful submission:

Another word that has changed its meaning over time is the word ‘naughty’. For us today naughty means being a bit badly behaved, without being altogether evil. If someone eats a piece of chocolate when they shouldn’t or drinks an extra glass of wine, we say that was ‘naughty’.

But originally, being naughty had nothing to do with being badly behaved. Originally, being naughty was equated with being poor. The poor had naught (they had nothing) and so they were called naughty. This was not a comment on their character or behavior. It was simply a description of their socio-economic status.  

This morning’s reading begins with Peter instructing wives to submit to their husbands. In today’s world, where such a high value is placed on personal freedom, the word submit sounds like a swear word. People generally prefer to resist or rebel or protest. The word submit is a bit like the word naughty in that it has changed significantly from its original meaning. So what Peter’s first century readers understood when they heard, ‘Wives, submit to your husbands’, was quite different from what we hear and understand.       

We might hear: sexist, discrimination, inequality, male privilege, domestic violence, oppression and injustice. But Peter’s original audience would have heard things like: winsome, beautiful, gentle, character, courage, purity, reverence, peace and order in the home. I’m not making this up. It’s actually in the text.

To submit means to accept, or yield to, the will of another person. Obedience goes hand in hand with submission. When we submit to someone we put ourselves under that person’s authority. Submission does not diminish our worth or our value as human beings. It is simply a way of saying, ‘you first’.

There are basically two ways to submit to someone: either willingly and freely, or because you are forced to. Peter has just told his readers (in chapter 2) to submit freely to the government and to their masters. ‘In the same’ way wives are to submit to their husbands; that is, freely and not under duress.

In other words, don’t submit because you are forced to. Don’t submit because society expects you to. Don’t submit because you are afraid. Wives, you be empowered. You be in control of the choice to submit.   

If my daughter asks me for a ride somewhere I submit to her request, not because I have to but because I want to. My taking her where she wants to go then becomes an act of love. It helps to reinforce the bond between us.

Likewise, if Robyn says, ‘Can you take the lid off this jar?’, I submit to her request because I want to. Obeying Robyn freely does not make me less in any way. Robyn is not oppressing me. If anything she is making me feel useful.

The submission Peter has in view here is freely given, it is not forced. It is an expression of love, which creates trust between people.

So, should wives always submit to their husbands then? Well, no. Wives should not blindly do whatever their husbands say. In verse six Peter tells wives to do what is right and not give way to fear. The kind of submission Peter is calling for requires discernment and courage. It is a righteous submission.

Our ultimate submission is to God. If your husband (or wife) wants you to do something that is clearly offensive to God, then you must give priority to what God wants. For example, if your husband wants to use you as a punching bag, then you do not have to submit to that.  

In the first century Roman empire, wives were expected to adopt the religion of their husband. But some of the people Peter was writing to had pagan husbands. Peter is not saying wives should worship the gods of their pagan husband. No. They should not submit in that way. That would undermine their faith in Jesus.

To the contrary, Peter is saying: try to win your husband for Christ by being a winsome witness. Peter writes… 

…submit yourselves to your husbandsso that, if any of them do not believe the word, they may be won overwithout words by the behavior of their wives, 2 when they see the purity and reverence of your lives.

The idea here is that submission provides a winsome witness. To be winsome is to be attractive or charming or appealing in a fresh and innocent way. Winsomeness is not loud or self-promoting. It is pure and authentic.

People can argue with what you say but they cannot argue with their experience of you. An unbelieving husband is likely to be alienated by a wife who harps on about Jesus all the time. But winsomeness speaks for itself without words.

The character Jane Bennet, in Jane Austin’s novel Pride and Prejudice, is the very picture of winsomeness. Unlike her youngest sister Lydia, Jane has a far more gentle and gracious way with people. When she is given the cold shoulder by Mr Bingley she does not think the worst of him. She graciously wishes him well in her heart and does not force the issue. And as we know, the story ends happily for Jane.     

Or if you are familiar with the story of Beauty and the Beast, then we find an example of a winsome woman in the heroine of the story, Belle. Belle submits to the beast, without compromising her virtue, and her winsomeness breaks the spell so the beast is transformed back into a charming prince again.  

St Augustine describes the winsome witness of his Christian mother, Monnica, to his pagan father Patricius:

She served her husband as her master and did all she could to win him for You (Lord), speaking to him of You by her conduct, by which you made her beautiful… Finally, when her husband was at the end of his earthly span, she gained him for You. [1]    

A winsome wife supports her husband. She encourages him when he is down and guides him when he is lost. She is not high maintenance or always badgering with a list of demands. She does not scold him or complain about his faults to her friends. A winsome wife sees his faults and shows grace.      

In verse 1, when Peter talks about husbands that do not believe the word, he means those who have not accepted the gospel about Jesus. The original Greek word translated as believe is more literally obey.[2]  So the meaning is: ‘…if any of the husbands do not obey the gospel…’.

Belief and faith go hand in hand in a Christian understanding. One cannot claim to have faith in Christ without obedience to him.

It could be that some of the wives reading (or hearing) Peter’s letter had husbands who claimed to be Christian but actually did not obey the teaching of Jesus very well. They may have attended church services but then gone home and neglected the needs of their families. Maybe they spent their pay at the pub and didn’t put bread on the table for the kids.  

In that situation Peter is asking the wives to show their husbands the way of the gospel, not with words, but by the example of their lifestyle; their purity and their reverence.

Being reverent means living in the conviction that the whole world is the temple of God and all life is lived in the presence of Christ. The wife’s reverence here is to be directed toward God, not her husband. Husbands are not in the place of God.

Purity is the natural companion to reverence for God. Purity has to do with willing one thing. Not chasing after other men or women or other gods. Staying faithful and true to your husband or wife and to Jesus. If you revere God, if you put God in the number one place in your life, you will live a pure life, a holy life, a clean life, a life of moral integrity. 

The main point to get hold of here is that, for Peter and his first century readers, free submission was a beautiful thing. From verse 3 we read…

3 Your beauty should not come from outward adornment, such as elaborate hairstyles and the wearing of gold jewelry or fine clothes. 4 Rather, it should be that of your inner self,the unfading beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit, which is of great worth in God’s sight.

Peter is contrasting inward virtue with outward adornment. What really matters to God is the content of your character, not the cost of your clothes.

‘Pretty’ is another word that has changed over time. For us today pretty refers to someone or something that looks good or beautiful in a delicate kind of way. For us, prettiness is about outward appearances. We might say, for example, ‘That’s a pretty dress’.

Originally though pretty meant crafty or cunning. Being pretty, therefore, was not about the way someone looked on the outside. It had more to do with the way they thought on the inside. In the old sense of the word, a snake was pretty. You would never have said a dress was pretty because a dress was not capable of being crafty or cunning.

When Peter talks about beauty he does not mean pretty in either sense. True beauty is not an external style or look, nor is it about being cunning. The beauty Peter has in mind comes from the inside out. It is the beauty of a quiet and gentle spirit.

A person’s spirit refers to the way they relate with others. Spirit has to do with the character of relationship, or the quality of our connection with others.

Quiet does not mean silent or shy. It means calm, in control of yourself. If a quiet person does not speak much it is not because they are afraid or do not know what to say. It is because they are in control of their tongue. They think before they speak. Still waters run deep.

Likewise, gentleness does not mean being timid or weak. As we heard last Sunday, it takes great strength and self-control to be gentle. So to have a quiet and gentle spirit means to relate with others in a way that is calm and brings peace into that situation. 

When an unbelieving husband sees his Christian wife managing the home and the kids in a way that is graceful and results in a calm harmonious environment he will (if he has half a clue) see the virtue in his wife’s Christian faith and get on board with it.    

We should not think that quietness and gentleness are solely feminine qualities though. Jesus, who was a tradesman, a bloke, a carpenter, is described as having a quiet and gentle spirit. A bruised reed he will not break and a smoldering wick he will not snuff out, until he has brought justice to victory. [3]      

Now, I’m conscious there is a women’s clothes swap coming up. (The timing of this sermon is purely coincidental.) When Peter says, your beauty should not come from outward adornment he is not saying women cannot take care of themselves.

Ladies, you do not have to go around dressed in hessian sacks. You can go to the hairdresser, you can put on a bit of lippy and you can wear jewelry. (Personally, I think hairdressers do a public service. They make people feel good about themselves.)

Peter is warning against spending excessive amounts on our outward appearance and from wearing clothing that is seductive. The clothes swap saves money and no men are allowed, so there is little chance of extravagance or seduction. Besides, the main purpose of the clothes swap is to get people together socially; to build relationship. So you don’t have to feel guilty about going to the clothes swap.

In thinking of the cultural context, Karen Jobes makes the observation that Peter’s instruction against extravagant outward adornment makes sense.[4] Women in that culture did not leave the home very much.

If a Christian wife left the house to go to church, all dolled up, people in the first century would think she was off to see her fancy man; that she was having an affair. Which would obviously bring shame on her husband and on Christ. Not very winsome. But by going out in public unadorned, her purity of purpose, her reverence for God and her intent to attend worship would be more clear.        

In verse 5 Peter refers to the women of the Old Testament, holding them up as an example of what it means for wives to submit to their husbands. He says these women put their hope in God. Hope is about the future. Physical beauty has no future; it fades and so you don’t want to put your hope in that. We are to put our hope in God because he alone has the power to make our character beautiful and a beautiful character is eternal.

In verse 6 Peter pays special tribute to Sarah who obeyed Abraham and called him master. The example of Sarah & Abraham is interesting. The submission in their marriage went both ways; it was mutual submission. Yes, Sarah did submit to what Abraham asked, even when it was risky for her to do so. She did after all follow Abraham into the unknown. But Abraham also submitted to Sarah’s wishes on more than one occasion.

In particular, I’m thinking of Genesis 16 when Sarah, who was unable to have children herself, asked Abraham to consider a surrogacy arrangement with Hagar. Abraham agreed even though it was probably a bit awkward for him.  

The point is: the ideal in Christian marriage is not a hierarchy with the husband at the top issuing orders and the wife underneath obeying his every command. No. The ideal is a genuine partnership where husband and wife are on the same footing, alongside each other, giving space to really listen to one another. If both partners in a marriage are believers, then they should seek God’s will together and submit to that.

Of course, Peter is addressing situations that are not ideal. In his cultural context marriage was a top down hierarchy. If the man was not a believer, the next best thing was for the wife to freely submit to her husband for the sake of Jesus’ reputation and her husband’s salvation.

Having spent some time describing what beautiful submission looks like, in marriage, Peter then instructs men in how to relate with women – that is with knowledge and respect.  

Husband – knowledgeable respect:

I remember browsing through a bookshop one holidays and coming across a paperback with the title, ‘What men know about Women’. It was quite a thick book. I had not been married long at that point and thought, this is interesting, I might learn something. So I opened it up and flicked through the pages. There wasn’t one word written in the whole book. (The message was: men don’t know anything about women. Not very winsome if you ask me.)

In verse 7 we read: Husbands, in the same way be considerate as you live with your wives, and treat them with respect as the weaker vessel and as heirs with you of the gracious gift of life, so that nothing will hinder your prayers.

The word translated as considerate is more literally knowledgeable. So it carries the sense of Husbands, be knowledgeable (or show understanding) as you live with your wives.

I’m not sure that a man can ever fully understand a woman but he can listen and learn. The message here guys is pay attention to your wives. Think about what her needs are. Do not neglect your wife. Do not take her for granted.

If she has been at home all day looking after the kids then she is probably going to need some time with you in the evening, some adult conversation. If this is what she needs, give her a break. You put the kids to bed, you do the dishes. Then switch off the TV and give her your full attention.     

Or, if she has been at work all day and comes home exhausted, she might just want some peace and quiet. Show her some understanding. You could offer to cook the dinner while she has a soak in the bath to relax. 

But the knowledge in view here is not just the husband’s knowledge of the wife. It is also the husband’s knowledge of what God requires. We take care of our wives because we know that pleases God.

Peter tells husbands to treat their wives with respect. That word ‘respect’ is literally precious in the original Greek. It is the same word used of Jesus in chapter 2:6-7, where it talks about Christ being the precious cornerstone. So husbands are to treat their wives as precious, as highly valuable. 

One of the main ways a man respects a woman and treats her as precious is by submitting to her ‘no’. If a woman says no, then we men need to respect that. No means no. We don’t cross that line. 

Peter says men should respect their wives because they are the weaker vessel, which in our culture sounds a bit offensive. But actually it’s not.

By calling women the weaker vessel Peter means women do not have the same physical strength as men. It’s not that women are physically weaker in every respect. It takes quite a bit of strength to give birth, for example. Not only that but women tend to live longer than men and often have a higher pain threshold. But when it comes to lifting heavy objects and opening jars, men usually have the advantage.

The main point Peter is getting at here is that it is not okay for a man to use his physical strength against his wife. Hitting women is prohibited. We today are quick to agree with Peter but, in the first century, men thought it was acceptable to hit their wives. They thought it was their right in fact. Peter is standing up against his culture and saying, that’s not who we are in Christ. You cannot hit your wife and then expect God to answer your prayers. It does not work like that.  

In verse 7 Peter says that women are heirs with you [men] of the gracious gift of life.  This means women of Christian faith stand to inherit eternal life, so they have equal standing, with men, before God. The message is clear: Husbands, treat your wife with knowledgeable respect for she is your equal.

Conclusion:

Christian marriage is not a hierarchy with the husband at the top issuing orders and the wife underneath obeying his every command. No. The ideal is a genuine partnership where husband and wife are on the same footing, alongside each other, giving space to really listen to God and one another.

Grace and peace be yours in abundance.

Questions for discussion or reflection:

What stands out for you in reading this Scripture and/or in listening to the sermon? Why do you think this stood out to you?

  • Why does Peter give six verses of instruction for wives and only one verse for husbands?
  • How do Peter’s instructions to wives apply to all believers, irrespective of gender or marital status?
  • How do you feel about the word submission? Is this a swear word or a beautiful word for you? How would Peter’s first century readers have felt about the word submission? 
  • What does it mean to have a quiet and gentle spirit? Can you think of examples of Jesus’ quiet and gentle spirit in the gospels?
  • Why do you think Peter warned against elaborate hairstyles and the wearing of gold jewelry or fine clothes?
  • How should Christian husbands treat their wives? Think of some practical examples.
  • Thinking of the wider canon of Scripture, what is the ideal for Christian marriage? 

[1] Quoted in Edmund Clowney’s commentary on 1st Peter, page 130.

[2] Refer Thomas Schreiner’s commentary on 1st Peter, page 149. 

[3] Matthew 12:20

[4] Refer Karen Jobes’ commentary on 1st Peter, page 205. 

Tawa Baptist

Tuakana-teina

Scripture: 1st Peter 2:21-25

Structure:

  • Introduction
  • Tuakana-teina
  • Jesus’ example: innocence, meekness, faith
  • Redemptive suffering
  • Conclusion

Introduction:

Good morning everyone.

Do you have a favourite sandwich? For me it would have to be a Reuben. Reuben sandwiches are fairly simple: two thick slices of wholegrain bread (toasted) with corned beef and sauerkrauts in the middle. Hard to beat a good corned beef sandwich. 

Today we continue our series in the New Testament epistle of first Peter. We are roughly in the middle of Peter’s letter now, in a section that looks a bit like a sandwich. Not a Reuben sandwich so much; more of a suffering sandwich.

The focus of this morning’s passage (chapter 2, verses 21-25) is Christ’s suffering. Jesus provides the Christian believer with a model for responding to unjust suffering. This is the meat of the sandwich.

It seems that Peter has intentionally sandwiched Jesus’ suffering between instructions to slaves (which we heard about last week) and instructions to wives (which we will look at next week). Slaves and women being two of the most vulnerable and disadvantaged groups at the time Peter was writing. From 1st Peter chapter 2, verses 21-25, we read…

21 To this you were called, because Christ suffered for you, leaving you an example,that you should follow in his steps. 22 “He committed no sin, and no deceit was found in his mouth.” 23 When they hurled their insults at him,he did not retaliate; when he suffered, he made no threats. Instead, he entrusted himselfto him who judges justly. 24 “He himself bore our sins” in his body on the tree, so that we might die to sinsand live for righteousness; “by his wounds you have been healed.” 25 For “you were like sheep going astray,”but now you have returned to the Shepherd and Overseer of your souls.

May the Spirit of Jesus illuminate God’s word for us.

Peter’s words in these verses draw on Isaiah 53, where the prophet talks about the suffering servant. Peter takes this prophecy from Isaiah and appropriates it to Jesus, whose suffering had a redemptive effect.

Tuakana-teina:

In traditional Maori society there is a concept, or more accurately a relationship, known as tuakana-teina. If you work in education you may be familiar with it.

Tuakana is the Maori word for an older brother, sister or cousin. And teina refers to a younger brother, sister or relation.   

The principle of Tuakana-teina is used in schools as a model for buddy systems, where an older or more expert tuakana helps and guides a younger or less experienced teina. The idea is to create a culture of care and support.

Tuakana-teina is actually part of the DNA of our church also. When we talk about our church being inter-generational, part of what we mean is that we want to be a community of faith where each of the generations is represented and the older more mature believers (the tuakana) help and guide the younger less experienced (the teina). Of course, it’s not just the younger who learn from the older. The older can also learn from the younger. It is a mutually beneficial relationship.    

Last Sunday, being Labour weekend, the BIG and Flock kids (aged 3-12 years) combined for their Sunday school programme. One of the advantages of occasionally combining age groups like this is that it provides the opportunity for tuakana-teina relationships to form. In fact, one child (a 12-year-old boy) was helping a 5-year-old boy with a craft they were doing and said to Robyn, ‘tuakana-teina’. He understood it wasn’t just about completing the craft. Yes, the craft helps one to remember the lesson but, more importantly, it is a vehicle for building relationships of care and support.  

In using an example from Sunday school I don’t mean to suggest that tuakana-teina is just for kids. It is for the whole congregation. Someone in their 20’s can be a tuakana to someone in their teens (as happens in youth group). Just as someone in their 40’s or 50’s can be a tuakana for someone in their 20’s or 30’s, and so on. 

In verse 21 Peter says: To this you were called, because Christ suffered for you, leaving you an example,that you should follow in his steps.  

Verse 20 tells us the this to which we are called is ‘suffering for doing good and enduring it’. 

With our calling in mind, Jesus is our tuakana (our older brother) and we are his teina (his younger siblings). Ours is a tuakana-teina relationship. Jesus shows us by his example how we are to handle ourselves if or when we experience unjust suffering.  

Broadly speaking Peter highlights three things about Jesus’ example here: Jesus’ innocence. Jesus’ meekness and Jesus’ faith. When we manage to follow Jesus’ example, of innocence, meekness and faith, we point others to Christ and so glorify him. Our relationship with Jesus is meant to be mutually beneficial.  

Jesus’ example:

In verse 22 Peter alludes to Isaiah 53:9 saying of Jesus: “He committed no sin, and no deceit was found in his mouth.”

This refers to Jesus’ innocence or his righteousness. Jesus is the only human being ever to have lived to adulthood and be sinless. Jesus is the spotless, perfect Lamb of God. The fact that Jesus committed no sin and yet still suffered punishment implies that his suffering was unjust, not fair.

We note here that Jesus was sinless both in word and deed. ‘No deceit was found in his mouth’, tells us that Jesus had a clean heart as well as clean hands. The mouth speaks what the heart is full of. Therefore, no deceit in the mouth implies no deceit in the heart. Jesus did not pretend. He was the same on the inside as he was on the outside.

The fact that Jesus was without sin and was always honest means he is a genuine tuakana who we can trust. His example carries weight. 

Now, it needs to be acknowledged that while Jesus was completely innocent or sinless, we are not. Sometimes (or perhaps often) we fall short. Nevertheless, we need to do our best to be innocent in all our dealings with others, so that if we are wrongly accused we can draw strength from a clear conscience. God, who knows all things and is just, will vindicate the innocent either in this life or the next.     

Jesus had perfect control over himself, which brings us to our next point; Jesus’ meekness. In the first part of verse 23 Peter writes: When they hurled their insults at him,he did not retaliate; when he suffered, he made no threats.

This illustrates Jesus’ meekness. Meekness is often misunderstood these days as being a bit timid or weak. But meekness is not weakness. Quite the opposite. Meekness is great strength, great power, under control. Meekness is akin to gentleness. It takes tremendous strength to control oneself, and not retaliate, in the crucible of injustice.

In 2nd Samuel chapter 16, a man named Shimei starts cursing David and throwing stones at him and yelling insults. One of the men with David says: ‘Why should this dead dog curse my lord and king? Let me go over and cut off his head.’

And David replies, ‘…Leave him alone; let him curse, for the Lord has told him to. It may be that the Lord will see my distress and repay me with good for the cursing I am receiving today.’ David responded with meekness here; great strength under control. David had the power to kill Shimei but he doesn’t. Instead he trusts himself to God.

In Matthew 26, when Jesus was arrested in the Garden of Gethsemane, one of the disciples responded with the opposite of meekness. He drew his sword and struck the servant of the high priest cutting off his ear. But Jesus intervened saying: Put your sword back in its place, for all who draw the sword will die by the sword. Do you think I cannot call on my Father and he will at once put at my disposal more than twelve legions of angels?

Jesus then healed the servant’s ear and submitted to his unjust arrest because it was God’s will for him in that situation. That is meekness, great power under control. Jesus had the power to easily smash his opponents but he kept that power in check for the well-being of others.   

Later, that night, when Jesus was brought to trial and wrongly accused of all sorts of crimes, he was silent. Then, the next day, when Jesus was hanging on the cross his enemies goaded him saying: If you are the Messiah, come down from the cross and save yourself. But Jesus did not respond with threats. He did not say, ‘My dad is going to get you for this’. No. He said: ‘Father forgive them for they do not know what they are doing’. That is one example of meekness, given to us by Jesus (our tuakana).     

Now, I need to say here that meekness does not always equate to biting your tongue, staying silent and doing nothing. While it is true that Jesus never threatened anyone there were plenty of times when Jesus spoke up to expose the truth.

Jesus called a spade a spade. (There was no deceit found in his mouth.) Jesus said to the Pharisees openly, ‘You white washed tombs. You look good on the outside but inside you are filled with corruption and filth.’ Jesus was not being unkind in saying this. He was not threatening them. To the contrary, he was simply stating the facts; both for the benefit of the people (so they would not waste their lives following the wrong example) but also for the benefit of the Pharisees themselves, so they would clean up their act and return to God.

The point is, meekness does not mean avoiding the truth or keeping silent about injustice. If you are suffering physical or sexual abuse, then expose the truth. Tell someone you trust what’s happening to you. Say what is. Do not make threats to the abuser about what you are going to do. Do not retaliate or seek revenge either. Instead be meek and get help. Report the abuse to someone who can help you get free of it. Let the authorities deal with it.

There is wisdom in walking away from an abusive situation. In Luke 4 Jesus stood up to speak in the synagogue and the people there took offense at him, so much so that they decided to throw him off a nearby cliff. In that situation Jesus did not submit to their abuse because his time had not come. But nor did he call down fire from heaven to destroy them. Instead he quietly slipped through the crowd and walked away. That too was meekness.  

Just because it was God’s will for Jesus to die on the cross, it does not automatically follow that it is God’s will for you to suffer abuse too. The fact that Jesus taught us to pray, ‘Your will be done, your kingdom come, on earth as it is in heaven’, tells us that not everything that happens to us, in this world, is God’s will. Jesus died to bring an end to sin and death. Ultimately it is God’s will that abuse stops and people are free to love him and each other.

So meekness can find expression in a variety of ways. Sometimes by keeping silent and other times by speaking out. Sometimes by walking away and other times by making a stand or taking the fall for someone else.

The single thing that enabled Jesus to be meek was his faith or trust in God’s justice. In the second part of verse 23 Peter tells us that Jesus entrusted himselfto God who judges justly.

Jesus had faith that God would see him right. And Jesus’ faith in God was rewarded. God vindicated Jesus by raising him to new life on the third day. Jesus’ resurrection is evidence that God is just and that Jesus was innocent. It is because God is just that we can have confidence that he will right any wrongs or injustices we suffer, if not in this life then in the next. 

Jesus is our tuakana (our older brother) and the example he gives for us to follow is the way of innocence, meekness and faith.

Redemptive suffering:

Can anyone here tell me what a cooper is? [Wait]

That’s right. A cooper is a tradesperson who makes wooden barrels. A very popular trade in centuries gone by but not so much in demand now.

Two or three weeks ago one of my favourite TV shows returned: The Repair Shop. In this series people bring much loved antiques and treasures to a workshop of skilled craftspeople who set about repairing and restoring the items. I like this show because it is essentially about redemption. Redemption means saving or reclaiming something.

One of the items brought in a couple of weeks ago was a small wooden barrel. The barrel was missing some braces and was basically in pieces, so it couldn’t hold liquid.

After the master cooper had put the barrel back together again, he took a bag of salt and poured it into the barrel, followed by some hot water. He then explained how the salt makes the barrel sweet again. The salt draws all the nasties out of the wood and into itself. The salt absorbs the impurities, cleansing the barrel.

This struck me as a parable of what God did, through Jesus, in redeeming us. Jesus came to save us and reclaim us for God. 

In verse 24 of 1st Peter chapter 2 we read: “He himself bore our sins” in his body on the tree, so that we might die to sinsand live for righteousness; “by his wounds you have been healed.”

If we are like a broken barrel, then God is like the master cooper and Jesus is like the salty water whose life was poured out to cleanse our souls from within.

Jesus bore our sins, in his body, a bit like salt soaks up the impurities in a wooden barrel. Jesus did not do this so we could refill the barrel of our soul with more impurity. He did it so our lives could be filled with the new wine of his Spirit and we could live for righteousness.    

“By his wounds you have been healed” is a poetic way of saying Jesus’ suffering is redemptive. It heals us in a spiritual sense. It saves us and reclaims us for God’s purpose. 

The classic Old Testament story of redemptive suffering is that of Jacob’s son Joseph. If anyone suffered unjust treatment it was Joseph. Although he had done nothing to deserve such treatment Joseph was sold into slavery by his brothers, who were simply jealous of him.

To his credit Joseph did not allow this injustice to make him resentful or bitter. Instead he went about meekly proving himself a good worker in the house of his master, Potiphar. Potiphar promoted Joseph putting him charge of all the other household servants.

But there was more injustice coming Joseph’s way. When Potiphar’s wife took a fancy to Joseph, and Joseph refused to sleep with her, she falsely accused him of sexual assault and Joseph was thrown into prison. The fact that Potiphar did not have Joseph killed indicates that he knew Joseph was innocent but, like Pilate before Jesus, his hands were tied.

God gave Joseph the grace to endure the hardship in prison and, as he had done with Potiphar, Joseph went about meekly proving himself a trustworthy servant to the man in charge of the prison. After 3 and half years, God then provided a way out for Joseph.

Long story short, Joseph interpreted Pharaoh’s dream and Pharaoh made Joseph Prime Minister of Egypt. This put Joseph in a position to redeem many lives from starvation, including the lives of his brothers who had sold him into slavery in the first place.       

Joseph points to Jesus, in that his suffering was redemptive. God used Joseph’s unjust suffering to save many, just as he used Jesus’ suffering to save many more.

Our Scripture reading today finishes with verse 25 where Peter says:

For “you were like sheep going astray,”but now you have returned to the Shepherd and Overseer of your souls.

This echoes Isaiah 53:6 which reads: We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; and the Lord has laid on him the iniquity of us all. In other words, none of us are completely innocent. We are all sinners.

The Shepherd and Overseer of our souls refers to Jesus. Jesus is the good shepherd who goes after the lost sheep and indeed who musters the flock for their redemption.

Often, when we think of Christ as the good shepherd, we picture the image of Jesus tenderly carrying a lamb on his shoulders. And while tenderness is one layer of the meaning here, it is not the only layer.

Peter is quick to call Jesus the Overseer of our souls which indicates Jesus’ authority over our lives.  Jesus has every right to require us to respond to unjust treatment with innocence, meekness and faith because that is what he has done in redeeming our souls. 

Conclusion:

Returning to The Repair Shop for a moment. Another item brought in for redemption was an old fashioned set of scales for weighing babies. The cradle in which the babies were laid was a basket made from willow canes. This cane basket was in a bad state.  

The basket weaver who fixed the cradle explained that, before she could work with the willow canes, she had to soak them in water to soften them up and make them flexible. Otherwise the canes would be too brittle and would snap in her hands when she tried to weave them together.

It made me think, we are a bit like the willow canes in God’s hand. We need to be soaked for a while before we are flexible enough to be useful to the Lord’s purpose. But what is it we soak in? Is it the water of unjust suffering or is it the water of God’s grace?

Well, I suspect it is both, depending on what we need. Suffering, in small doses, can make us softer and more compassionate but too much suffering can dry us out, making us hard and brittle. In which case we probably need to soak in the water of God’s grace for a bit.

Just as actual water (H2O) is two parts hydrogen and one-part oxygen, I imagine the metaphorical water God uses to soften us up is two parts grace and one-part suffering.      

In a few moments we will share communion together. Communion is a time to remember the example of our tuakana, Jesus. It is a time to soak in the water of Christ’s suffering and grace for us. May God’s grace and peace attend you.

Questions for discussion or reflection:

What stands out for you in reading this Scripture and/or in listening to the sermon? Why do you think this stood out to you?

  • What is your favourite sandwich? In what way is today’s Scripture reading like a sandwich?
  • What is tuakana-teina? Can you think of any tuakana-teina relationships that have been mutually beneficial in your own experience? In what sense is Jesus our tuakana?
  • Discuss / reflect on the example Jesus has given us – that is Jesus’ innocence, meekness and faith. Which of these facets of Jesus’ character do you find most appealing? Which is most disturbing or challenging for you?
  • What are some of the ways that meekness can find expression? How might we know when to be quiet and when to speak up? Or when to walk away and when to stand our ground?
  • Why did Jesus bear our sins in his body?
  • How has God used suffering and grace to redemptive effect in your life?      
Tawa Baptist

Grace

Scripture: 1st Peter 2:18-21

Structure:

  • Introduction
  • Christians are like slaves
  • Unjust suffering is grace
  • Conclusion

Introduction:

Good morning everyone.

Tomorrow is Labour Day. In a general sense Labour Day is a public holiday to celebrate workers. Labour Day has its origins in the eight-hour day movement, which advocated a balanced lifestyle of eight hours for work, eight hours for recreation, and eight hours for rest.

Many countries around the world celebrate Labour Day on the 1st May, but in New Zealand we take the fourth Monday off in October. The New Zealander often associated with the eight hour working day is Samuel Parnell, a Wellington carpenter.

In the 1840’s a shipping agent, named George Hunter, asked Samuel Parnell to build him a store on Lambton Quay. Parnell agreed, on the condition that he would only work eight hours per day. Hunter was initially reluctant, but Parnell argued that “we have twenty-four hours per day given us; eight of these should be for work, eight for sleeping, and the remaining eight for recreation and in which for men to do what little things they want for themselves. I am ready to start to-morrow morning at eight o’clock, but it must be on these terms or none at all.”

When Hunter pointed out how different this was from London, Parnell replied “We’re not in London.” Due to a severe shortage of skilled workers in New Zealand, Hunter was forced to accept Parnell’s terms on the spot.

Samuel Parnell greeted ships coming in to Port, and told the new migrants not to work more than eight hours a day. In a workers’ meeting in October 1840, it was agreed that people should only work eight hours a day, which must be between 8am and 5pm. Anyone accepting less favourable working conditions was to be thrown into the harbour.

On the 28 October 1890, the 50th anniversary of the eight-hour day was commemorated with a parade. Then in 1899 the government passed legislation to make Labour Day a public holiday.

Today we continue our series in the letter of first Peter. Last week we heard how Christian believers are to submit to the government. This week we learn what Peter has to say about how Christian believers are to respond to unjust treatment. From 1st Peter chapter 2, verses 18-21 we read…  

18 Slaves, submit yourselves to your masters with all respect, not only to those who are good and considerate, but also to those who are harsh. 19 For it is grace if someone bears up under the pain of unjust suffering because they are conscious of God. 20 But how is it to your credit if you receive a beating for doing wrong and endure it? But if you suffer for doing good and you endure it, this is grace before God. 21 To this you were called, because Christ suffered for you, leaving you an example,that you should follow in his steps.

May the Spirit of Jesus illuminate God’s word for us.

On the face of it, today’s reading is about how slaves (or workers) are to relate to their master. Scratching beneath the surface though we find it is less about slavery and more about how Christian believers are to respond to unjust treatment. Two things to highlight from what Peter is saying here:

Firstly, Christians are like slaves and secondly, unjust suffering is grace.  

Christians are like slaves:

As you are heading north on State Highway 1, just past Paekakariki, there is a bill board advertising a commercial real estate firm. On this billboard is a picture of Christian Cullen (a former All Black) in a suit standing beside someone else in a suit, with the phrase: ‘From one great team to another.’ It’s clever advertising.   

Businesses tend to align themselves with successful sports teams and individuals because they want to associate themselves with the strength and success of that team. For example, Sanitarium also piggy back off the reputation of the All Blacks as a fit, healthy and strong team by showing TV ads of All Black players eating Weetbix.

By the same token, most big-businesses are keen to distance themselves from teams and athletes who have fallen into disrepute. Lance Armstrong was dropped like a stone by his sponsors (Nike and Budweiser) when he got caught for doping some years back.   

In first Peter 2, verse 18, Peter begins talking about how slaves are to relate with their masters. In the context of the first century, slaves were on the lowest rung of society. They did not have the same protection under the law and so they did not enjoy the same power or privilege as people who were free.

Slaves were like the opposite of the All Blacks in terms of their social standing. No self-respecting business would align their brand with slaves. They just would not want their name associated with people who were essentially powerless and dishonoured in society.

By giving particular attention to slaves, Peter is characterising his first century readers as people without power and privilege in society at large. Peter is saying: we Christians are like slaves. And, in the historical context, it was a fair comparison. While Peter’s readers were a mixture of slave and free, they were all pretty much despised and maligned by the wider Roman world simply because they were Christians.

From a public relations point of view, it is strange that Peter aligns the Christian community with the slave community. In marketing terms, it was not good for the Christian brand. If Peter wanted to improve the public perception of the Christian community, he would have been better to sponsor the colosseum where gladiatorial games took place. This would make the Christian brand appear powerful and strong and popular with the masses.

But Peter does not do that. Why? Because that would be a denial of Christ and Peter was not going to make that mistake again. The truth is we worship a crucified God. Jesus embraced the shame, the dishonour, the powerlessness and the injustice of the cross, in obedience to God. Jesus aligned his name, not with the All Blacks of this world, but rather with the Lance Armstrong’s of this world. Cheats and sinners like us.    

The other thing that is strange here, from our 21st Century perspective, is that Peter does not speak out against slavery. Slavery is clearly wrong, to our way of thinking at least, and yet Peter seems to condone it when he instructs slaves to submit to their masters. We, in the affluent west, want to read a Bible that condemns slavery but the New Testament does not do that.

Consequently, we may be tempted to put a distance between ourselves and Peter’s words here because Peter’s instruction, for slaves to submit to their masters, is not good for our Christian brand. It makes us appear backward and morally bankrupt in the eyes of contemporary society.  

In response to this, let me shed a bit of light on the historical context. When we hear the word slave we tend to think of the 18th and 19th Centuries when black Africans were kidnapped and transported to America in chains to work as farm hands, picking cotton or harvesting sugar. Images of violence and abuse from movies like Roots and Gone with the Wind and Armistad and 12 Years a Slave and The Cider House Rules and Uncle Tom’s Cabin come to mind.

However, slavery in the Roman empire of the first century was not exactly the same as the slavery of 18th and 19th centuries. For one thing, slaves of the first century were not just black. Slaves could be of any race or ethnicity.

What’s more some slaves in the first century were highly educated people. Yes, many slaves worked in the fields and the mines or waited on tables, but there were others who worked as doctors, teachers, and business managers.   

And while a good many slaves of the first century were abused, because there was little or no legal protection for them, others were treated well and a small minority (with the help of their masters) were able to buy their freedom. This in no way makes the slavery of the first century okay. But it was different to the picture of slavery we often get from Hollywood movies.

We live at a time and place in history where human trafficking is rightly considered evil but for the people of the 1st Century slavery was socially acceptable. It is thought that between 85%-90% of the population were slaves in New Testament times. [1] The economy depended on slavery. The pagan society of Peter’s day simply did not see anything wrong with slavery. It was not a moral issue for them. It was an economic necessity.

As I’ve said on a number of occasions, the Christian community were a marginalised minority, viewed with suspicion if not contempt. It would have been completely unrealistic for the fledging New Testament church to criticise slavery or advocate its overthrow. The young churches would be fighting the consensus of the Greco-Roman world. Any attempt at social revolution would have been doomed to failure. [2]

Peter’s focus was not on changing social structures. His main concern was to see transformation of the human heart, from the inside out. Once the human heart and mind are in tune with Jesus, the slave becomes your brother or sister. Social status is no longer important and slavery becomes a moot point – it dissolves.  

In any case, we are in no position to throw the first stone. Slavery is not just a problem consigned to history. Slavery, in various forms, is still alive and well in our world today. 

The fact that Peter does not openly condemn slavery in his letter does not mean the Bible condones it. Far from it. Slavery is a man-made institution. It was not God’s idea. Jesus came to set the captives free. Jesus came to turn the values of this world upside down. It is because of the influence of Christ that we now see slavery as evil. Jesus teaches us to uphold the dignity and value of every human life, for we are all made in the image of God. But Jesus does not bring about this change through violent political revolution. He does it incrementally, slowly, via the cross, through vulnerability and weakness.     

Okay, so that’s the first thing Peter is saying: Christians are like slaves. The second point is even more disturbing: unjust suffering is grace.

Unjust suffering is grace:

If we are shocked by Peter’s instruction for slaves to submit to their masters, we may be horrified by what comes next. Peter tells his readers to submit, not only to those masters who are good and considerate, but also to those who are harsh or morally crooked. From verse 19 we read…

For it is grace if someone bears up under the pain of unjust suffering because they are conscious of God. …if you suffer for doing good and you endure it, this is grace before God.

Some English translations of these verses say: it is commendable if someone bears up under the pain of unjust suffering… But the word translated as commendable is actually charis in the original Greek and charis means grace.    

While grace is commendable, at its heart the word grace means gift. Grace is a beautiful gift, a good gift, a life giving gift. Grace enables the winsomeness we talked about a couple of weeks ago. Grace is not earned by hard work, nor can it be taken by force. Grace can only be received as a gift in an attitude of trust.

For it is grace if someone bears up under the pain of unjust suffering because they are conscious of God.

Peter’s words here seem a long way from Labour Day. They are a thousand miles from Samuel Parnell’s insistence on an eight hour working day. Parnell and his friends probably would have thrown Peter in the harbour for preaching this stuff.        

I like Peter’s realism in these verses though. He is a down to earth fisherman who more than likely worked a lot more than 8 hours a day. After all, if he did not catch fish he did not eat.  He does not entertain any illusions about the way the world is.

Peter is basically saying, this world is not always kind or fair. Injustice is still very much a part of the fabric of this world. As a Christian you should expect some unjust treatment from time to time. Not everything that happens in this world is God’s will. But nothing is beyond the reach of his grace.

If you are able to endure the pain (the mental anguish) of unjust treatment, because you are aware of God, then this is grace (not disgrace).

So in what sense is enduring unjust treatment grace? How is mistreatment by your master or employer a beautiful gift? Because, at the time, the pain of unjust treatment, of being misunderstood or maligned or falsely accused does not feel like grace. Being a lightning rod for someone else’s anger, being blamed for someone else’s mistakes, does not feel good or life giving.  It may cause us to think that God is unhappy with us or has abandoned us when, in fact, the opposite is true.   

The capacity to endure the pain of injustice, without compromising who you are, is a beautiful gift (a God given grace) in that situation. God’s grace is in the strength he gives to handle the injustice. We are to be vessels (or containers) of God’s grace making His presence real. 

I imagine some of you, perhaps most of you, have experienced God’s grace in this way. Think of a time in your life when things were tough, when circumstances were against you, through no fault of your own, but somehow (mysteriously) you handled it. That was likely God’s grace, giving you the peace and the strength you needed.

Isn’t it strange the way we can lose the plot when something little goes wrong (like when someone doesn’t replace the toilet roll when it’s finished or tramps leaves through the house when you’ve just vacuumed or some other little thing irks you). But when a far more challenging situation presents itself (like the death of a loved one or the loss of a job or level 4 lockdown) we seem to rise to the occasion and surprise ourselves by coping well.

That ‘rising to the occasion’ is something more than just adrenalin. It is God’s grace. God is the one who gives us what we need to endure the hardship. It’s like God is carrying us through that difficult experience – and that is a beautiful gift. 

In thinking of the grace to endure unjust treatment by an employer I am reminded of the story of Jacob from Genesis. When Jacob ran away from home he went to his uncle Laban. Laban had two daughters, Leah and Rachel. Jacob fell in love with Rachel and made a deal with Laban to work for seven years in exchange for marrying Rachel.

At the end of the seven years Laban switched the bride and tricked Jacob into marrying his eldest daughter, Leah. Jacob then had to work another seven years to pay the bride price for Rachel. But God gave Jacob the grace to submit to Laban, even though Laban was deceitful and crooked.

God’s grace for Jacob was altogether beautiful. God’s grace came in the form of the euphoria of romantic love which made the seven years pass quickly for Jacob. Not that Jacob had to wait 14 years to be with Rachel. He married Rachel a week after Leah. But God’s grace also came through Leah, who provided sons for Israel. 

Jacob was not Laban’s slave exactly but he was subject to Laban as a worker and Laban was not a good or easy boss. After 20 years of service to Laban, working as a shepherd far more than eight hours a day, Jacob had had enough and left under the cover of darkness with his family.

This suggests there are limits to submission and there comes a time to throw off the yoke of oppression. You do not need to submit to abuse in the workplace. There is legal protection available to workers these days that simply was not available in ancient times. Returning to Jacob & Laban. We note that in leaving, Jacob did no violence to Laban. Laban caught up with Jacob and the two of them made a solemn promise to do no harm to each other. An amicable separation. 

Okay, so the grace to endure unjust suffering is something good which comes from God to help us through a difficult time. We believers, who are God’s slaves, essentially become a vehicle of God’s grace for the undeserving. But is there another way to understand what Peter means when he says unjust suffering is grace? Well, maybe, with the benefit of hindsight.

Sometimes God’s grace comes to us in a form that is not pleasant. God’s grace does not always feel like the euphoria of falling in love. Sometimes God’s grace is an ugly duckling that we despise at first, but which later turns into a beautiful swan. We often only recognise God’s grace in the rear vision mirror.

Earlier in the service we heard a reading from Matthew 16 where Jesus predicted his suffering, death and resurrection. Peter (the same Peter who wrote this letter) took Jesus aside and rebuked Jesus saying, ‘Never, Lord. This shall never happen to you.’

Peter was well intentioned of course. He was loyal to Jesus and did not want Jesus to suffer injustice like this. But Jesus turned to Peter and said, ‘Get behind me Satan. You are a stumbling block to me; you do not have in mind the things of God, but the things of men.’

What a devastating critique. Peter was only trying help. To Peter’s credit he did not throw his toys out of the cot and return to his fishing business. He did not get the pip with Jesus and walk off in a huff. Instead he submitted to what Jesus said, even though it probably seemed a bit harsh and unfair to him at the time. Peter stuck with Jesus.

It was only later, after he had witnessed Jesus’ suffering and death and had seen the risen Jesus, that Peter understood. The ugly duckling of unjust suffering was actually a graceful, beautiful swan in waiting. Jesus’ unjust suffering was the means of God’s grace for undeserving humanity.

Conclusion:

Verse 21 tells us that, as Christians, we are called to unjust suffering, because Christ suffered for you, leaving you an example, that you should follow in his steps.

The Greek word translated as example was used to refer to a pattern of letters of the alphabet over which children learning to write would trace. [3] Jesus left us the pattern of the cross over which we are to trace out our lives, in order that we might follow in his steps.

We are unlikely to be scourged and crucified as Jesus was, but we are likely to suffer injustice, in some way or another, if we openly follow Christ. This injustice will hurt but it is grace if we bear it without losing trust in God. For if we share in Christ’s suffering we will also share in his glory. That is the pattern.

After sowing in tears comes reaping with joy.

After waiting in silence comes revelation.

After alienation comes intimacy.

After unjust treatment comes vindication.  

After darkness comes the dawn.

And after death comes resurrection.    

Let us pray…

Father God, we thank you for your grace in all its forms. We confess that (like Peter) we do not always recognise your grace or welcome it. We find the way of Jesus hard. We don’t enjoy being misunderstood or blamed for other people’s mistakes. We don’t like turning the other cheek when we are treated unfairly and yet your grace is often revealed in these experiences of injustice. (Lord, I don’t like the way of the cross, but I like you.) Forgive us for the times when we have resisted your will. Give us grace to embrace our cross and follow in the footsteps of Jesus so that the love of Christ would be real for others and the hope of glory real for us. Amen.      

Questions for discussion or reflection:

What stands out for you in reading this Scripture and/or in listening to the sermon? Why do you think this stood out to you?

  • Why do you think Peter aligns the Christian community (brand) with slaves? How do you feel being aligned with people at the bottom of the social ladder?
  • Why do you think Peter (and the NT generally) does not explicitly condemn slavery? In what ways has the influence of Christ changed attitudes to slavery over the centuries?  
  • What is grace? What do you think Peter means when he says, ‘For it is grace if someone bears up under the pain of unjust suffering because they are conscious of God.’?
  • When is it not appropriate to submit to your boss? When might one make a stand and throw off the yoke of oppression?
  • Can you think of a time in your own life when things were tough (through no fault of your own) and God gave you grace to handle it? What form did God’s grace come to you in? Share your story with someone you trust.

[1] Paul Copan, ‘Is God a Moral Monster?’, page 151.

[2] Thomas R. Schreiner, 1st Peter, page 136.

[3] Refer Karen Jobes’ commentary on 1st Peter, page 195.