Tawa Baptist

Spread the Nets

Scripture: Acts 11:1-18

Title: Spread the Nets

Key Idea: Spread your nets to receive from God

Structure:

  • Introduction
  • Receiving the vision
  • Receiving the Word & Spirit of God
  • Receiving the other
  • Conclusion

Introduction:

The headline for this year’s Tranzsend Prayer and Self Denial campaign is: ‘til the nets are full’

  • We have certainly known about the fullness of water this past week
  • Anyway, ‘til the nets are full’ is a reference to the story in Luke 5, where Jesus said to Peter…
  • ‘Now go out where it is deeper and let down your nets to catch some fish’
  • When Peter did this they caught so many fish their boats were on the verge of sinking. Afterwards Jesus says to Peter…
  • “Don’t be afraid; from now on you will be a fisher of men.”
  • In other words, ‘Peter, I’m calling you to catch people for me – to bring men & women into the kingdom of God’

This story from Luke forms the back drop of Tranzsend’s Prayer & Self Denial campaign this year

  • Today’s sub heading is “Spread the Nets”

Please turn with me to Acts 11 – page 164 toward the back of your pew Bibles

  • 2000 years ago, when the Christian church first began it was comprised pretty much entirely of Jews
  • Over the past 2 weeks we have heard how the Spirit of God led Peter to spread the net of the gospel wider, among the Gentiles
  • On hearing this some of the Jewish Christians criticised Peter
  • Acts 11 describes how Peter responds to this criticism.
  • From verse 1 we read…

Read Acts 11:1-18

 

May the Spirit of Jesus help us to receive God’s Word

On the wall here we have a picture of four things…

  • A TV aerial, an ear, a net and a softball glove
  • Who can tell me what these four things have in common?
  • [Wait for people to respond]
  • Yes, that’s right. They are all used for catching or receiving things
  • A TV aerial receives a signal
  • An ear receives sound
  • A net receives fish
  • And a softball glove receives the ball

 

When we think of mission (and Christian service generally) we tend to think about giving and making sacrifices and going out into the world

  • And while giving & going out is certainly integral to the work of mission
  • Receiving is just as important
  • In fact, without first receiving, we find we have nothing to give

After being criticised by his own for spreading the net of the gospel wider (to include the Gentiles) Peter responds by retelling the facts of what happened

  • And what we notice in Peter’s retelling is there is lots of receiving going on in this mission
  • Peter receives a vision from God
  • The Gentiles receive the Word & Spirit of God
  • And the Jewish believers back in Jerusalem are faced with the challenge of receiving the other – that is, those different from them, the Gentiles

Receiving the vision:

From Peter’s perspective it started with receiving a vision from God

  • The vision was of a sheet containing all sorts of animals, both clean and unclean, both kosher for eating and not kosher
  • Some commentators reckon the sheet represents the church which will contain all races and classes without distinction [1]

This vision of an inclusive church is not entirely new

  • It actually goes back to the time of Noah

Richard Rohr observes how God tells Noah to bring into the ark all the opposites: the wild and the domestic, the crawling and the flying, the clean and the unclean, the male and the female of each animal…[2]

  • God puts all the opposites together and holds them together in one place
  • The ark is kind of a metaphor for the church where God brings opposites together: male & female, sinners & saints, conservatives & liberals, Jews & Gentiles, the socially acceptable & the outcastes
  • Perhaps God wants us to learn to live with dirt & difference

So Peter’s mission to the Gentiles begins with him (personally) receiving a vision from God

  • Interestingly none of the other believers receive this vision – just Peter
  • And Peter acts on this vision without consulting the wider Jewish church in Jerusalem
  • Yes, he takes six Jewish believers along with him as witnesses and helpers but essentially Peter doesn’t involve the church congregation or even the church leaders in the decision

This is quite different from the traditional Baptist way of doing things

  • We are highly consultative in our decision making process
  • We regularly find ways to listen to the congregation

And we do this for a number of reasons

  • Firstly, we believe God speaks through the congregation
  • We figure if God wants something to happen he won’t just speak to one individual – he will speak to many
  • Secondly, we are keen to bring the congregation along with us
  • We don’t want to alienate people if we can help it and so we discuss things (sometimes at length)
  • It is probably also fair to say we are influenced by our social & political environment and therefore we favour a democratic approach

But, if Peter had asked his congregation to vote on whether he should visit Cornelius they would have said ‘no’

  • God’s ways are not always our ways
  • God does not always speak through the congregation
  • God isn’t always democratic
  • Sometimes the majority are wrong
  • Sometimes God speaks in ways we may not be expecting

Peter certainly wasn’t expecting to receive the vision God gave him

  • Going to the home of a Roman Centurion was probably furthest from his mind – I imagine it made Peter feel really uncomfortable
  • But Peter obeyed God, in faith, and was criticised for his efforts by people from his own church
  • After hearing Peter’s minority report though, the Jerusalem Church recognised God’s hand at work
  • The Gentiles had received God’s Word & His Spirit so they were legit

Receiving the Word & Spirit of God:

On the wall here we have three pictures

  • One of a rain gauge attached to a post
  • Another of a man opening a door from the inside
  • And a third of a man hugging a tiger

The rain gauge receives water passively – as it falls from the sky

  • The rain gauge does not make a conscious decision to receive water
  • That just happens without the rain gauge’s awareness or consent

By contrast the man opening the door is actively receiving someone

  • Likewise the other man actively receives the tiger by hugging him

To receive the Word of God is an active thing, not a passive thing

  • For Cornelius, receiving the Word of God meant believing the message Peter was preaching – putting his faith in Jesus

Likewise to receive the Spirit is an active thing – like opening the door to let someone into your home, or like hugging a tiger

  • When Cornelius believed the gospel message he opened the door of his heart to the Spirit and the Spirit came on him
  • God’s Word and God’s Spirit go together

You may be wondering why I used a picture of a tiger hugging a man when talking about receiving the Spirit

  • Well, the Spirit is like a wild tiger in the sense that he is more powerful than us and we can’t tame him – he is free to roam where he pleases
  • However, the Spirit is not like a tiger in every respect – the Spirit would never force himself on a person much less maul them

The point is, receiving God’s Word and his Spirit is an active thing, not a passive thing

If we read the Bible passively, without really letting it in – so the words roll off our soul like water off a ducks back – then we aren’t really receiving God’s Word in any meaningful sense

  • Or if we study the Bible as if it was just another historical artefact or an interesting piece of literature, without connecting the words to our own experience or situation – then we are missing the point

God’s word and God’s Spirit go together

  • The door of our heart may be closed when reading the Bible or listening to a sermon but the Spirit can still knock on the door

Receiving the other:

In verse 18 we read how, after hearing Peter’s account of what had happened in Caesarea, the Jewish believers stopped their criticism and praised God saying…

  • ‘God has given the Gentiles also the opportunity to repent and live”

This strikes me as a little ironic really

  • Repentance is about transformation and conversion
  • It means a change of mind and a change of behaviour
  • The first Jewish Christians would not associate with Gentiles – now the Spirit was knocking on the door of their heart with an invitation to receive the other – which in their case meant the Gentiles
  • It seems the Spirit was also giving the Jewish believers the opportunity to repent and live (even if they weren’t quite ready to admit it)

Emmanuel Levinas (a 20th Century Jewish philosopher) notes how the Biblical tradition says that truth is not found in abstract concepts, but in an encounter with otherness

  • According to Levinas it is “the face of the other” that transforms us, converts us and gives us our deepest identity [3]

For example, Moses’ life was changed through an encounter with Yahweh

  • As was David’s through an encounter with Goliath
  • Jonah was confronted with the truth about himself through an encounter with the people of Nineveh (his enemies)
  • Jesus’ deepest identity (as God’s Son) was revealed through his encounter with Satan in the wilderness
  • Peter (a Jew) realised the broader more universal truth of the gospel through his encounter with Cornelius (a Gentile)
  • And the apostle Paul experienced conversion through his encounter with the risen Christ on the road to Damascus

We are not changed by being in a room with people who are the same as us

  • We are transformed and come to know our true selves through encounter with others who are different from us
  • What this means is that true religion isn’t really about arguing over ideas and abstract concepts
  • Nor is evangelism & Christian mission simply about communicating four spiritual laws which people must know (in their head) to be saved
  • True religion, real evangelism (the kind that brings authentic change for the better) is about encounter and presence and relationship

When I look around this room I don’t see everyone being the same

  • This is a room full of people who are different from each other
  • God designed the church that way
  • Christianity isn’t just a good idea
  • Christianity is face to face encounter, it is felt presence – it is relationship
  • That is why we gather – that is why coming to church on a Sunday and meeting each other during the week is important

Perhaps the best way to get this across is by telling a story

  • Oscar Wilde wrote a piece of short fiction called the ‘Selfish Giant’
  • I’m not sure what meaning Oscar Wilde intended but to me this is a salvation story
  • It’s about being transformed and coming to know our true self in the face of the other
  • We don’t have the time to read the whole story this morning so I’ll give you an edited version…

Every afternoon, as they were coming from school, the children used to go and play in the Giant’s garden.

     It was a large lovely garden, with soft green grass. Here and there over the grass stood beautiful flowers like stars, and there were twelve peach-trees that in the spring-time broke out into delicate blossoms of pink and pearl, and in the autumn bore rich fruit…

     One day the Giant came back. He had been to visit his friend the Cornish ogre, and had stayed with him for seven years. When he arrived [home] he saw the children playing in the garden.

     ‘What are you doing here?’ he cried in a very gruff voice, and the children ran away.

     ‘My own garden is my own garden,’ said the Giant; ‘any one can understand that, and I will allow nobody to play in it but myself.’ So he built a high wall all round it, and put up a notice-board.

 

TRESPASSERS WILL BE PROSECUTED

 

He was a very selfish Giant. The poor children now had nowhere to play…

 

     Then the Spring came, and all over the country there were little blossoms and little birds. Only, in the garden of the Selfish Giant, it was still Winter. The birds did not care to sing in it as there were no children, and the trees forgot to blossom.

The only people who were pleased were the Snow and the Frost. ‘Spring has forgotten this garden,’ they cried, ‘so we will live here all the year round.’…

.

     ‘I cannot understand why the Spring is so late in coming,’ said the Selfish Giant, as he sat at the window and looked out at his cold white garden; ‘I hope there will be a change in the weather.’

     But the Spring never came, nor the Summer. The Autumn gave golden fruit to every garden, but to the Giant’s garden she gave none. ‘He is too selfish,’ she said. So it was always Winter there…

 

     One morning the Giant was lying awake in bed when he heard some lovely music… It was only a little linnet singing outside his window, but it was so long since he had heard a bird sing in his garden that it seemed to him to be the most beautiful music in the world. Then… a delicious perfume came to him through the open casement.

‘I believe the Spring has come at last,’ said the Giant; and he jumped out of bed and looked out.

          What did he see? He saw a most wonderful sight. Through a little hole in the wall the children had crept in, and they were sitting in the branches of the trees. In every tree that he could see there was a little child. And the trees were so glad to have the children back again that they had covered themselves with blossoms, and were waving their arms gently above the children’s heads…

 

It was a lovely scene, [except] in one corner it was still Winter. It was the farthest corner of the garden, and in it was standing a little boy. He was so small that he could not reach up to the branches of the tree, and he was wandering all round it, crying bitterly…

     The Giant’s heart melted as he looked out. ‘How selfish I have been!’ he said; ‘now I know why the Spring would not come here. I will put that poor little boy in the tree, and then I will knock down the wall, and my garden shall be the children’s playground for ever and ever.’ He was really very sorry for what he had done.

     So he crept downstairs and opened the front door quite softly, and went out into the garden. But when the children saw him they were so frightened that they all ran away, and the garden became Winter again.

 

The little boy did not run [though], for his eyes were so full of tears that he did not see the Giant coming. The Giant stole up behind him and took him gently in his hand, and put him up into the tree. And the tree broke at once into blossom, and the birds came and sang in it, and the little boy stretched out his two arms and flung them round the Giant’s neck, and kissed him.

 

When the other children saw that the Giant was not wicked any longer, they came running back, and with them came the Spring.

‘It is your garden now, little children,’ said the Giant, and he took a great axe and knocked down the wall…

     All day long the [children] played, and in the evening they came to the Giant to bid him good-bye.

     ‘But where is your little companion?’ he said: ‘the boy I put into the tree.’…

     ‘We don’t know,’ answered the children; ‘he has gone away.’ …

     The Giant was kind to all the children, yet he longed for his first little friend, and often spoke of him…

 

     Years went over, and the Giant grew very old and feeble. He could not play about any more, so he sat in a huge armchair, and watched the children at their games, and admired his garden.

‘I have many beautiful flowers,’ he said; ‘but the children are the most beautiful flowers of all.’

    

One winter morning he looked out of his window as he was dressing. He did not hate the Winter now, for he knew that it was merely the Spring asleep, and that the flowers were resting.

     Suddenly he rubbed his eyes in wonder, and looked and looked. It certainly was a marvellous sight. In the farthest corner of the garden was a tree covered with lovely white blossoms. Its branches were all golden, and silver fruit hung down from them, and underneath it stood the little boy he had loved.

    

Downstairs ran the Giant in great joy, and out into the garden. He hastened across the grass… [toward] the child. But when he came close his face grew red with anger… For on the palms of the child’s hands were the prints of two nails, and the prints of two nails were on the little feet also.

     ‘Who hath dared to wound thee?’ cried the Giant; ‘tell me, that I may take my big sword and slay him.’

     ‘Nay!’ answered the child; ‘but these are the wounds of Love.’

     ‘Who art thou?’ said the Giant, and a strange awe fell on him, and he knelt before the little child.

     The child smiled on the Giant, and said to him, ‘You let me play once in your garden, to-day you shall come with me to my garden, which is Paradise.’

     And when the children ran in that afternoon, they found the Giant lying dead under the tree, all covered with white blossoms.

We are changed and come to be our true selves through encounter with Christ

  • Funny thing is, Christ is often present to us in the face of the other

[1] Rackman, cited in John Stott’s commentary on Acts, page 194.

[2] Richard Rohr, ‘Things Hidden’, page 36.

[3] Refer Richard Rohr, ‘Things Hidden’, page 61.

Tawa Baptist

Into the Deep

Scripture: Acts 23b-48

Title: Into the Deep

Structure:

  • Introduction
  • Peter approaches Cornelius as an equal
  • Conclusion

Watch the Week 2 Self Denial ‘Into the Deep’ DVD clip…

https://www.tranzsend.org.nz/week-2-video-prayer-and-self-denial

Introduction:

The headline for this year’s Tranzsend Prayer and Self Denial campaign is: ‘til the nets are full’

  • This is a reference to the story in Luke 5, where Jesus taught the crowds from Simon Peter’s fishing boat
  • When Jesus had finished speaking to the people he said to Simon Peter…
  • ‘Now go out where it is deeper and let down your nets to catch some fish’
  • When Peter did this they caught so many fish their boats were on the verge of sinking. Afterwards Jesus says to Peter…
  • “Don’t be afraid; from now on you will be a fisher of men.”
  • In other words, ‘Peter, I’m calling you to catch people for me – to bring men & women into the kingdom of God’

This story from Luke forms the back drop of Tranzsend’s Prayer & Self Denial campaign this year

Today’s sub heading is “Into the Deep”

  • Please turn with me to Acts 10 verse 23 – page 164 toward the back of your pew Bibles
  • In this passage we read how Peter ventures into the deep to preach the gospel among the Gentiles
  • This was a fishing spot Peter hadn’t imagined God would use – but one which would become very fruitful

You may remember from last week how Cornelius had sent 3 of his men to invite Peter to his home in Caesarea, after receiving a vision from God

  • God gave Peter a vision as well, assuring Peter he should go with them
  • We pick up the story from the second half of verse 23 – top of page 164

Read Acts 10:23b-48

 

May the Spirit of Jesus give us understanding

Peter approaches Cornelius as an equal

There was a Scottish farmer who did not believe the gospel story

  • The idea that God would become a man seemed absurd to him
  • His wife however was a devout believer and raised their children in the Christian faith
  • The farmer sometimes gave her a hard time, mocking her faith and belief
  • “It’s all nonsense”, he said. “Why would God lower himself to become a human like us?”

One snowy Sunday evening his wife took the children to church while the farmer stayed home to relax

  • After they had left the weather deteriorated into a blinding snow storm
  • Then he heard a loud thump against the window
  • Then another thump and another
  • He ventured outside to see what was happening
  • There in the field was the strangest sight: a flock of geese
  • They’d been migrating south & had become disorientated by the storm

The farmer had compassion on them

  • Wanting to help he opened the doors of his barn and stood back, hoping they would find their way in for warmth & shelter – but they didn’t
  • So he tried to shoo the geese in but they scattered in all directions
  • Perplexed, he got some bread and made a trail into the barn but they didn’t catch on
  • Nothing he did got them into the warmth and shelter of the barn

Feeling totally frustrated he exclaimed…

  • “Why won’t they follow me? Can’t they see this is the only place where they can survive the storm? How can I possibly get them to safety?”

He thought for moment and then realised they wouldn’t follow a man – the only way would be for him to become a goose

  • If he were like them he could speak to them in their own language and they would trust him and follow him anywhere

At that moment the farmer realised the implication

  • “If only I could become like one of them, then I could save them”
  • At last he understood God’s heart towards humankind [1]
  • God became a man (in the person of Jesus) in order to save us

In the Tranzsend DVD clip we saw earlier, Richard & Sally told us about Nondita – a young woman who had graduated from their Bible school and made the decision to work in a garment factory, from the bottom up

  • Nondita did this to understand the way the garment workers think, to fully appreciate where they are coming from
  • This is very much the incarnational model of Christ

That word ‘incarnation’ essentially means that God became a human being in Jesus

  • In other words, God approaches us on equal terms or on an even footing
  • He puts himself in our shoes, not talking down to us in a language we can’t understand, but walking & talking with us (alongside us) as one who has entered into our experience and shared our suffering and knows the joys and pains of being human

As a Bible College graduate I imagine Nondita had options, but (like Jesus) she laid her options aside and chose to approach garment workers on an even footing, on equal terms, as one alongside

We see Peter take a similar approach in Acts 10 with Cornelius

  • From verse 25 of Acts 10 we read…
  • As Peter was about to go in, Cornelius met him, fell at his feet, and bowed down before him. But Peter made him rise. “Stand up”, he said; “I myself am only a man.”

John Stott observes here that…

  • Peter refused to be treated by Cornelius as if he were a God
  • And he refused to treat Cornelius as if he were a dog. [2]

In other words, Peter approaches Cornelius on equal terms

  • Peter does not look down on Cornelius and he does not allow Cornelius to think of himself as inferior
  • Peter makes it clear that the ground is level at the foot of the cross
  • Evangelism (telling others good news) is simply one beggar telling another beggar where to find bread
  • Peter has the humility to understand that they are both beggars and God is the baker
  • Just because Peter knows where the bakery is doesn’t make him superior to Cornelius
  • To the contrary, it makes Peter responsible to pass on the good news

As Richard Rohr points out, Jesus referred to his followers as salt and light

  • Salt is not the whole meal and light illuminates something else [3]
  • Peter knows he’s not the whole meal – he is simply there to illuminate the way for Cornelius

Peter says, “You yourselves know very well that a Jew is not allowed by his religion to visit or associate with Gentiles. But God has shown me that I must not consider any person ritually unclean of defiled.”

  • Now, from a Gentile point of view, that might seem offensive to us
  • It kind of comes across like Peter is saying, “I’m better than you”
  • But I don’t think Peter means it like that – he’s not being offensive
  • Actually he’s taking responsibility for one of the excesses of his own people, the Jews
  • He’s basically admitting that the Judaism of his day had got it wrong by becoming too exclusive

Now let me be clear – a certain amount of exclusiveness is necessary to maintain cultural identity and purity of worship

  • If we become too inclusive we end up losing our distinctiveness and blending in with everyone else
  • The Jewish exiles needed to work very hard at being distinctive from the nations around them in order to stay faithful to Yahweh
  • They just took it too far
  • The Jews were meant to use the light they had been given to illuminate the way for the Gentiles, but instead they hid their light under a bushel
  • We hide our light under a bushel when we don’t associate with people who are different from us – when we don’t let others see our light

Of course it’s not just the Jews who have made the mistake of becoming too exclusive

  • Different branches of the Christian church have done the same thing at various times over the past 2000 years – including the Baptist movement

A little exclusiveness is necessary then, to maintain our distinctiveness from the world

  • But inclusiveness is also needed for people to taste the salt & see the light

After Cornelius has explained his reason for inviting Peter, Peter then goes on to give his sermon and he begins by saying…

  • “I now realise that it is true that God treats everyone on the same basis. Whoever worships him and does what is right is acceptable to him, no matter what race he belongs to…”

The implication here is that Cornelius’ Gentile nationality is acceptable to God and so Cornelius has no need to become a Jew [4]

  • This does not mean that Cornelius’ own righteousness was adequate for salvation – if it was then Cornelius would have no need to listen to Peter

Peter continues his sermon in this affirming tone, acknowledging what Cornelius and his household already know

  • Verse 36: ‘You know the message… of peace through Jesus’
  • Verse 37: ‘You know of the great event that took place…’
  • Verse 38: ‘You know about Jesus of Nazareth…’

This is quite lovely of Peter really

  • It’s like Peter is saying to Cornelius, you’re not starting from scratch here mate, you already know much of the background
  • It’s a way of acknowledging what Cornelius brings to the conversation
  • In doing this Peter is finding common ground
  • And the beautiful thing is Jesus is the common ground

Having acknowledged what Cornelius already knows about Jesus, Peter then goes on to talk about what Cornelius doesn’t know – in particular…

  • Jesus’ healing ministry
  • Jesus’ death and resurrection
  • Jesus as judge of the living and the dead
  • And Jesus as the means of salvation
  • For as the prophets (of the Old Testament) said…
  • …everyone who believes in him will have his [or her] sins forgiven.  

As Peter spoke the Holy Spirit came down on all who were listening and they started speaking in strange tongues, praising God’s greatness

To receive the gift of the Holy Spirit is to receive something of God himself

  • The gift of the Spirit is proof of God’s acceptance of us personally
  • It’s sort of like God’s authenticating signature on the portrait of our lives
  • Or His water mark on the currency of our soul
  • Or, to use a more 21st Century analogy, His electronic identification chip in the passport of our heart

There is more to the person of the Spirit than that of course, but you get the point – the gift of the Spirit seals the deal. Nothing trumps the Spirit.

Speaking in strange tongues in this context means speaking another language (one you don’t know)

  • Like being a native English speaker and then suddenly being able to speak fluent Cantonese or German or Afrikaans or whatever

Speaking in strange tongues is not the only sign of the Spirit

  • God’s Spirit can express Himself through us in any number of ways
  • But on this particular occasion God’s Spirit expressed Himself through tongues, most likely for the benefit of the Jewish believers who were witnessing it
  • You may remember in Acts 2 how God poured out His Spirit on the Jewish believers and they started speaking in strange tongues too
  •  Acts 10 is sort of a repeat of the Pentecost of Acts 2, only it is the Gentiles’ Pentecost this time

Peter had already said Cornelius and his household were on an even footing with him – now God confirms it with the gift of the very same Spirit & tongues

  • God couldn’t be more clear – He accepts people of all nations
  • Peter recognises this and orders the Gentiles to be baptised with water in the name of Jesus

Throughout the book of Acts Christian conversion normally involves 6 things…

  • The gospel about Jesus is preached, in particular his death & resurrection
  • The listener is convicted of their sin
  • And they put their faith in Jesus to save them
  • There is baptism with water (in the name of Jesus)
  • And the Holy Spirit is given to seal the deal
  • The new believer also starts sharing life with other Christians – they become part of the church in other words

These things don’t always happen in the same order and they don’t necessarily happen on the same day – they may happen over weeks, months or even years

The text of Acts 10 implies that Cornelius’ conversion happened over the course of a number of years

  • It appears that Cornelius felt a conviction of sin well before he met Peter
  • Cornelius lived a very pious life, praying and performing acts of charity, which suggests to me he was conscious of his wrong doing and wanting peace with God
  • Cornelius’ faith is seen by his obedience to God in asking Peter to come to his home and in listening to Peter’s message
  • That Peter preaches the good news about Jesus to Cornelius is quite clear in today’s reading
  • Next comes the gift of the Holy Spirit
  • Closely followed by baptism in water
  • And then they share life together as Cornelius invites Peter and the other Jewish believers to stay a few days
  • Eventually (as we shall hear next Sunday) the Jewish church in Jerusalem also accepted the Gentile believers as part of the wider Church universal

That’s the way it happened for Cornelius

  • Maybe it happened a different way for you?

Perhaps you were baptised as an infant but didn’t really begin to live out that baptism until much later in life when God made Jesus real for you by His Spirit

Or maybe your conversion is still a work in progress

  • Maybe you have prayed the sinner’s prayer and asked Jesus into your heart but have never got around to being baptised in water
  • Maybe that’s something to think & pray about?

Or perhaps, like Cornelius, you have lived with a feeling of guilt (the conviction of sin) for many years and you long for peace with God

  • As Jesus said, “Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they will be satisfied
  • Maybe God wants you to lay down your burden, to stop doing your penance and put your trust in Jesus
  • If that’s you then there will be someone to pray with you at the front by the water cooler after the service this morning     

 

Conclusion:

Today we have heard how Peter ventures into the deep by approaching Cornelius on equal terms

  • Peter won’t allow Cornelius to feel inferior
  • Instead Peter makes it all about Jesus
  • And God confirms the Gentile believers’ equality with the Jewish believers through the gift of the Holy Spirit

One thing in all of this (which is pretty obvious but still needs to be said) is that the initiative with conversion is always with God

  • God got Cornelius to invite Peter to his home
  • And God changed Peter’s point of view so that Peter could see it was a good idea to go to the home of a Gentile
  • Peter preached, but God interrupted Peter’s sermon with a message of His own – the gift of the Spirit
  • The initiative was always with God – Peter was just doing his best to keep up

The application for us is we need to wait for God

  • If we go out into the deep of mission work without God we are courting disaster
  • If we try to rush people into making a decision for Christ before they are ready we can do more harm than good

By the same token we don’t want to lag too far behind God either

  • When God calls us out into the deep then we must act
  • What we learn in the process is that God owns the deep
  • When someone is ready to receive Christ (as Cornelius was) simply sharing our story of Jesus will probably be enough

The question for us is: what is God doing and how can we work in harmony with Him?

Let us pray…

[1] This story comes from J. John & Mark Stibbe’s book, ‘A Bundle of Laughs’, page 39.

[2] Refer John Stott’s commentary on Acts, page 189.

[3] Refer Richard Rohr’s book, ‘Things Hidden’, page 44.

[4] Refer John Stott’s commentary on Acts, page 190.

Tawa Baptist

At the Water’s Edge

Scripture: Acts 10:1-23a

Title: At the Water’s Edge

Structure:

  • Introduction
  • Jesus prepares Peter (to catch people)
  • Conclusion

Introduction:

 

Watch the Tranzsend intro to Self Denial video clip…

 

https://www.tranzsend.org.nz/media-video/1453-introduction-til-the-nets-are-full

 

Then watch the Tranzsend week 1 ‘at the water’s edge’ video clip…

 

https://www.tranzsend.org.nz/media-video/1454-at-the-waters-edge-week-1

 

Please turn with me to Luke chapter 5, page 81, toward the back of your pew Bibles

  • The headline for this year’s Tranzsend Prayer and Self Denial campaign is: ‘til the nets are full’
  • This is a reference to the story in Luke 5, where Jesus calls some of his first disciples, 4 fishermen from Galilee
  • From Luke 5, verse 1 we read…

Read Luke 5:1-11

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+5%3A1-11&version=GNT

May the Spirit of Christ give us understanding

This reading from Luke forms the back drop of Tranzsend’s Self Denial campaign this year

  • Today’s sub heading is “at the water’s edge”
  • At the water’s edge is where fishermen wash, mend and prepare their nets before heading out into the deep to catch fish
  • Without this careful preparation the effort of letting down and pulling up the nets can be wasted

In the DVD clip we saw earlier, Lynley spoke about the work they do at the water’s edge in Thailand to support and prepare the local Christians for mission

  • For example, they facilitated the installation of a water well in a village which gave the Christians in that place a passport to share the gospel
  • Lynley is also involved in creating Bible study resources for new Christians to help them get started in the faith
  • These, and other things, help prepare the way for Jesus

These activities are valuable and worthwhile but perhaps the most important work done at the water’s edge is the preparation and re-formation of ourselves (that is, our inner lives) so the nets of our hearts and minds are prepared for the work God has planned for us

In verse 10 of Luke 5 Jesus says to Peter…

  • “Don’t be afraid; from now on you will be a fisher of men.”
  • In other words, ‘Peter, I’m calling you to catch people for me – to bring men & women into the kingdom of God’

Jesus prepares Peter (to catch people)

Peter’s preparation (at the water’s edge) involved 3 years learning directly from Jesus, like an apprentice

  • Then, in the book of Acts, we see Jesus’ prediction come true as Peter indeed catches people for God, through preaching the gospel

Please turn with me to Acts chapter 10 – page 163 toward the back of your pew Bibles

  • In this passage we read how God sends Peter fishing among the Gentiles
  • But before heading out into the deep, the Spirit of Jesus first prepares Peter at the water’s edge
  • From Acts 10, verse 1 we read…

Read Acts 10:1-23a

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Acts+10%3A1-23a&version=GNT

May the Spirit of Jesus wash and mend the nets of our hearts and minds

‘Networking’

  • It’s a word these days which, in business circles, means meeting other people who can help you in your work, creating relationships with people which are mutually beneficial

When we were at Baptist College training for ministry our New Testament lecturer, George Weiland, gave us a picture of how relationships work when God is involved

[Pull out white board and draw vertical lines at either end of the board]

Imagine, if you will, that this line here represents you

  • And this other line over here represents someone else
  • Perhaps you are connected to this person through work
  • [Draw a horizontal line connecting the two vertical lines]
  • So long as you share the same workplace and get along then you have a connection
  • But if you (or they) leave the job, or you have a falling out, then the connection is severed [wipe out a hole in the horizontal line]

How do you keep the connection – how do you mend the relationship?

  • Well, it’s a lot harder if your only point of contact is work
  • But if you have made other connections with them…
  • [Draw more horizontal lines as you give examples]
  • Like for example, playing squash or baby-sitting their kids or inviting them over to your house for a meal or regularly praying for them, or whatever, then you have a lot more points of connection
  • And so the relationship is more robust and you are better able to fix the breakdown which happened at work [reconnect the broken line]

But wait there’s more – because if it is a relationship that God condones then God (by His Spirit) will strengthen those points of connection as we make them

  • [Draw vertical lines]
  • And now what do we have?
  • Yes, that’s right, a net. Far more robust than a single strand
  • Networking, in this sense, involves God

So how does this relate to Peter & Cornelius?

  • [Rub out what is on the board]
  • Well, imagine this line here [draw a vertical line to one side labelling it ‘C’ for Cornelius] represents Cornelius
  • And this line over here [draw another vertical line on the other side labelling it ‘J’ for the Jews] represents the Jews

Acts 10 starts with Cornelius

  • As a Centurion Cornelius was in charge of 100 men in the Roman army
  • This meant he was a Gentile – he wasn’t Jewish
  • We know this because the Jews at that time in history were exempt from military service

Somewhat surprisingly, despite being a Roman Centurion, Cornelius reaches out in acts of friendship to the Jewish people

  • His whole family worships Yahweh – the one true God [Draw a horizontal line]
  • Which means he probably attended the local synagogue [Draw another horizontal line]
  • Not only this but Cornelius helps the poor [Draw another horizontal line]
  • And he prays for people [Draw another horizontal line]

Cornelius is a top bloke, both by Roman standards and Jewish standards

  • And, he is at the edge of the water in the sense that he is ready to accept Jesus, only he needs someone to tell him about Jesus first
  • So God takes the initiative and sends an angel with very specific instructions for Cornelius to fetch Simon Peter
  • [Draw a vertical line on the white board]
  • And Cornelius obeys God as quickly as he can [Draw a horizontal line]

Although Cornelius is ready to receive Jesus, Peter isn’t yet ready to tell Cornelius about Jesus

  • Acts 10 is often described as the conversion of Cornelius but in many ways it is as much about the conversion of Peter
  • Peter needs the net of his heart & mind enlarged to accommodate the Gentiles

While Cornelius’ servants are on the way, Peter has a vision which basically makes it clear that all kinds of reptiles, birds and animals are now kosher to eat

  • [Draw a vertical line] – this is God doing some more to help Peter & Cornelius’ relationship

Peter, the ‘rock’, is aptly named for he disagrees with the voice saying

  • “Certainly not, Lord! I have never eaten anything ritually unclean or defiled”
  • Peter is complicated – on the one hand he says he never eats unclean foods but on the other hand he is boarding with a tanner whose trade (of working with dead animals) made him unclean [1]
  • But the voice spoke to Peter again, “Do not consider anything unclean that God has declared clean”. This happened three times
  • [Draw two more vertical lines]

While Peter was still trying to understand what the vision meant, the Spirit of Jesus said to him…

  • “Listen! Three men are here looking for you. So get ready and go down and do not hesitate to go with them”
  • [Draw another vertical line] – once again God is strengthening Peter & Cornelius’ relationship

Peter welcomes the Gentile messengers and shows them hospitality for the night [Draw a horizontal line] – then he leaves with them the next morning for Cornelius’ place – [Draw another horizontal line]

  • Peter has put it all together and realised God is saying, Gentiles are fit to be included in the sharing of the gospel – fit to receive Christ
  • This reconstruction of Peter’s net happens at the water’s edge, before Peter even meets Cornelius

We may think little of this from our perspective in history, but from Peter’s perspective (from a Jewish perspective) it was revolutionary, it was huge

  • Peter was going against literally 1000’s of years tradition, in faith that God was doing something new
  • It took great courage for Peter to embrace the change

In his book, ‘Things Hidden’, the Catholic priest Richard Rohr talks about… [2]

  • “My story”
  • “Our story”
  • And “The story”

My story is just that – it is my own personal life story, or your own personal life story – it is the story of the individual

Our story is about ‘us’ or ‘we’ – it is the collective story of the group we identify with

  • For example, we kiwis, or we Generation X’s or we Baptists or we teachers or whatever the group happens to be

And The Story is those things (or patterns) which always hold true, irrespective of My story or Our story

  • For example, ‘forgiveness always heals’ – that is true whether you are Christian, Hindu or Buddhist. The story describes ‘what is’

Let me illustrate further…

Peter’s my story is that he was a fisherman called to follow Jesus

  • He often put his foot in it and on one occasion he even denied Jesus
  • But Jesus restored him, so that Peter became the rock on which Christ built the church

Peter’s our story is that he was Jewish and we Jews don’t eat certain foods and we don’t associate with certain people – like Roman Centurions for example

  • We Jews stick to ourselves because we are God’s chosen people don’t you know

But the story (of which God is the author) is that God loves all nations, whether they are Jewish or not

  • Jesus died and was raised for all people. The gospel is for everyone and so Peter must not consider any person unclean

This is what happens for Peter in Acts 10 – this is what his conversion is about

  • God had to gently burst the bubble of Peter’s our story to show him the story (the bigger picture)
  • Or to put it another way, the story (of God) redeems both my story and our story
  • The story is the truth which gives meaning to our own private pain and sets us free from the failings of our own little culture or group

Sometimes in the history of inter-cultural mission one ethnic group has said our story is the story – or in other words, you must adopt our cultural practices if you want to be a Christian

  • We shouldn’t do that
  • We must have the humility (as Peter did) to tell the story of God without imposing our culture on others

When it comes to Cornelius’ ‘my story’ (his own personal story) little is known

  • He was a soldier in charge of 100 men and he was searching for God – that much is certain
  • Did he have blood on his hands? As a soldier, quite likely
  • Did he carry the burden of surviving when others around him had died?
  • Maybe – guilt might explain why he is trying so hard to be good
  • Then again it could be that he is simply an honourable man

As a functionary of the Roman army – part of the fist of Caesar – Cornelius’ our story was one of violence in pursuit of peace.

  • The Romans considered themselves great stewards of justice, but that is not necessarily how the people they had conquered saw it

The story is that God is in control more than the Romans and His way is one of vulnerability in pursuit of peace

  • Through the cross Jesus takes responsibility for any blood on Cornelius’ hands

In receiving the story of the gospel we must have the humility (as Cornelius did) to face the injustice of our story

  • To admit where the group we belong to has gone wrong
  • And to admit where we personally have gone wrong

Conclusion:

Don’t you love the way God uses Cornelius to evangelise Peter as well as using Peter to evangelise Cornelius

  • There is a mutuality to mission here which is quite beautiful
  • Peter is changed as much as Cornelius is

Peter, the missionary, doesn’t come with all the answers

  • He doesn’t have the whole story
  • But he is listening to God who does know the whole story
  • And so God speaks through Peter to Cornelius

Likewise Cornelius, the God fearing Centurion, does not sit in complete darkness – he is not entirely ignorant

  • He too is listening to God and so God uses Cornelius to reach Peter

Let me finish now with two questions…

  • What is your story?
  • And how is God enlarging your net with the story?

 

[1] Refer van Thanh Nguyen, in ‘Peter and Cornelius: A Story of Conversion and Mission’, page 118.

[2] Richard Rohr, ‘Things Hidden’, pages 21-24

Tawa Baptist

Brothers

Scripture: Genesis 4:1-16

Title: Brothers

Structure:

  • Introduction
  • God’s grace for Cain
  • Conclusion

Introduction:

Yesterday was ANZAC Day – NZ’s national day of remembrance for war veterans

  • 2015 also marks 100 years since Australian and NZ troops landed at Gallipoli during the First World War
  • Gallipoli is something of a sacred memory in the hearts & minds of New Zealanders and Australians
  • Some say it is where we forged our identity
  • In reality though Gallipoli was a military disaster for both sides, with over 100,000 men killed in total and many more wounded

A lot is made of Gallipoli, in NZ & Australia at least, but we don’t hear much about the Armenian genocide which happened around the same time

The Armenian Genocide was the Ottoman Empire’s systematic extermination of its minority Armenian subjects from their historic homeland within the territory of present-day Turkey.

  • The starting date of the genocide is conventionally held to be the 24th of April 1915, the day before the ANZAC’s landed at Gallipoli
  • Other indigenous and Christian ethnic groups such as the Assyrians and Ottoman Greeks were also targeted for extermination [1]
  • It is thought that more than 3.5 million people (Armenians, Assyrians & Greeks) were killed over a 30 year period. [2]  That is a lot of death
  • One can’t help wondering if the genocide might have been less extensive had the ANZAC troops succeeded at Gallipoli

Why am I telling you this?

  • Well this morning, in view of the ANZAC’s and the Armenians, our message looks back to the first known murder in Genesis 4
  • On the surface this story appears to be about Cain killing his brother Abel
  • But looking a little deeper we see it also has something to say about God’s grace. From Genesis chapter 4, verse 1 we read…

4 Adam lay with his wife Eve, and she became pregnant and gave birth to Cain. She said, ‘With the help of the Lord I have brought forth a man.’ 2 Later she gave birth to his brother Abel. Now Abel kept flocks, and Cain worked the soil. 3 In the course of time Cain brought some of the fruits of the soil as an offering to the Lord. 4 But Abel brought fat portions from some of the firstborn of his flock. The Lord looked with favour on Abel and his offering, 5 but on Cain and his offering he did not look with favour. So Cain was very angry, and his face was downcast. 6 Then the Lord said to Cain, ‘Why are you angry? Why is your face downcast? 7 If you do what is right, will you not be accepted? But if you do not do what is right, sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have you, but you must rule over it.’ 8 Now Cain said to his brother Abel, ‘Let’s go out to the field.’ And while they were in the field, Cain attacked his brother Abel and killed him. 9 Then the Lord said to Cain, ‘Where is your brother Abel?’ ‘I don’t know,’ he replied. ‘Am I my brother’s keeper?’ 10 The Lord said, ‘What have you done? Listen! Your brother’s blood cries out to me from the ground. 11 Now you are under a curse and driven from the ground, which opened its mouth to receive your brother’s blood from your hand. 12 When you work the ground, it will no longer yield its crops for you. You will be a restless wanderer on the earth.’ 13 Cain said to the Lord, ‘My punishment is more than I can bear. 14 Today you are driving me from the land, and I will be hidden from your presence; I will be a restless wanderer on the earth, and whoever finds me will kill me.’ 15 But the Lord said to him, ‘Not so; anyone who kills Cain will suffer vengeance seven times over.’ Then the Lord put a mark on Cain so that no one who found him would kill him. 16 So Cain went out from the Lord’s presence and lived in the land of Nod, east of Eden.

May the Spirit of Jesus illuminate this reading for us

God’s grace for Cain

About 17 or 18 years ago now, when we lived in Tauranga, I was at the hair dressers getting my hair cut

  • In the course of the conversation it came out that I was a Christian – at which point the hairdresser went very quiet for a few moments before telling me she couldn’t believe in God because so many wars had been caused by religion
  • Perhaps she really believed what she was saying or perhaps it was just an excuse to avoid the inconvenience God creates – I don’t know
  • But there is a perception among many people that religion is responsible for war

To my mind this is not a very accurate way to think about it

  • Saying that ‘religion is responsible for war’ is like saying ‘wood is responsible for forest fires’
  • Yes, the wood of religion can fuel the fire of war but it isn’t the tree which strikes the match
  • Sadly some people hijack religion for evil ends

Although Cain doesn’t exactly hijack religion in Genesis 4, the context of his murder of Abel is religious

  • Abel kept flocks and Cain grew crops
  • Cain brought some of his crops as an offering to the Lord
  • And Abel brought fat portions from some of the first born of his flock
  • These offerings were not for the forgiveness of sins
  • They were an act of worship – an acknowledgement that God was their boss, the one in charge, the one responsible for their crops and flocks

Verses 4 & 5 tell us that the Lord looked with favour on Abel and his offering, but on Cain and his offering he did not look with favour.

It is unclear what the text means exactly by “God’s favour”

  • What is clear is that Cain was upset to miss out on it
  • As most people know, if you have a group of children and you don’t treat them all the same then there will be protest…
  • “That’s not fair – why did he get two scoops of ice-cream when I only got one?”

So why did God show favour to Abel and not to Cain?

  • Was it because there was something wrong with Cain’s offering?
  • Some people over the centuries have suggested that God favoured Abel’s sacrifice because it involved the shedding of blood, while Cain’s didn’t
  • But that idea doesn’t really wash – later in the Bible God condones and even prescribes grain offerings, so it can’t have anything to do with blood
  • Others point out that Abel’s sacrifice included the fat portions of some of the first born of the flock while Cain’s offering gets no special mention, which might suggest that Cain’s grain was substandard
  • Possibly, but the text of Genesis 4 doesn’t actually criticise Cain’s offering

It seems to me a mistake to make God’s favour dependent on Cain’s (or Abel’s) sacrifice – after all, God’s favour is not earned, it is given

  • Neither Cain’s (nor Abel’s) offerings were adequate in themselves to earn God’s favour
  • As the song goes, were the whole realm of nature mine, would be an offering far too small [3]

 

Jesus told a parable about some workers who were hired by a land owner at different stages of the day

  • When it came to the end of the day the land owner paid everyone the same amount, whether they had worked all day or just the last hour
  • When those who had worked all day realised this they grumbled against the land owner, but he answered them…

‘Friend, I am not being unfair to you. Didn’t you agree to work for what I paid you? Take your wages and go. I want to give the man who was hired last the same as I gave you. Don’t I have the right to do what I want with my own money? Or are you envious because I am generous?’    [4]

God is free to show favour to whoever he wants

  • That doesn’t make God unfair – it just makes him generous
  • And if Cain is to become angry & envious due to God’s generosity then that tells us pretty clearly, the problem is with Cain, not with God

 

The writer to the Hebrews (in the New Testament) says…

  • By faith Abel offered God a better sacrifice than Cain did… [5]
  • This indicates that faith is the key issue, more than the offering itself
  • Abel made his offering in good faith (trusting God) and God credited his faith as righteousness
  • Whereas Cain made his offering in a way that somehow lacked faith

In verses 6 & 7 the Lord says to Cain…

  • ‘Why are you angry? Why is your face downcast? 7 If you do what is right, will you not be accepted? But if you do not do what is right, sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have you, but you must rule over it.’

God’s message to Cain seems to be…

  • You have a choice between reconciliation and alienation
  • Between peace and anger – choose reconciliation, choose peace
  • Face the problem and put things right before it is too late
  • We often think of God’s grace as the ambulance at the bottom of a cliff (fixing us up after we have crashed)
  • But here God’s grace (for Cain) is a warning sign at the top of the cliff

We are reminded of Jesus’ words in Matthew 5…

  • Therefore, if you are offering your gift at the altar and there remember that your brother has something against you, leave your gift there in front of the altar. First go and be reconciled to your brother; then come and offer your gift. 

Sadly Cain ‘yields to the waiting rage’ [6]

  • As Derek Kidner points out, ‘…while Eve had been talked into her sin [by the serpent], Cain will not have even God talk him out of it…’ [7]

Verse 8 tells us how Cain responded to God – by inviting his brother (Abel) out into the field and killing him

  • There is no wrestling with his conscience – just cold blooded, premeditated murder
  • Cain is angry because God has not accepted his offering so he destroys one made in God’s image
  • This murder reveals Cain’s lack of faith

Fortunately the way of Cain is not the only option available to us when it seems that God has rejected our offering

  • Let me tell you the true story of a man who offered himself for missionary service only to be turned down, twice

Paul Brand was the son of a missionary couple

  • Like his parents he also aspired to mission work and trained as a carpenter in the hope of travelling overseas to build schools and hospitals in the name of Jesus (as his father had done before him)
  • After completing his apprenticeship Paul approached J.B. Collin, the president of the mission council, and asked to be accepted for service in India
  • But despite being a ‘missionary kid’ and despite having carpentry skills Paul was judged unready for the kind of work the mission required
  • He was told he needed more preparation
  • Paul Brand writes, “I was crushed. God’s will had seemed so clear to me and now this key person was standing in my way.” [8]

Cain would have killed the mission director but not Paul Brand

  • After a short period of figuring things out he enrolled in medical school, counting his four years in the building industry a waste of time
  • Then, on completing his general medical training, Dr Paul Brand presented himself once again to the mission board
  • And once again he was turned down
  • This time the interference came from the Central Medical War Committee of Great Britain
  • They rejected his application to work in a mission hospital on the border of Nepal and instead ordered him into the bomb casualty clearing services in London (this was during the Blitz of World War 2)
  • Dr Brand continues his own story…

“Impatiently biding my time during the forced delay, I studied for higher qualifications in the field of surgery. Twice my good plans had been stymied, once by a wise and godly mission administrator and once by a secular committee of bureaucrats. Each time I had felt shaken and confused. Had I somehow misread God’s will for my life?”  [9]

As it turned out, those rejections and set backs were God’s hand directing Dr Brand’s life

  • Eventually Dr Bob Cochrane in India convinced the Central Medical War Committee to assign Paul Brand to a new medical college in Vellore, India, where Dr Brand received a call from God to work with leprosy patients
  • His carpentry skills became invaluable both as an orthopaedic surgeon and in setting up a carpentry workshop for his patients
  • God doesn’t waste anything

Just because God doesn’t accept your offering the first time, doesn’t mean he is finished with you

  • If Cain had had the faith to keep trusting God, when his offering had not been accepted, imagine the good God might have brought from it

It’s striking, isn’t it, that God doesn’t stop Cain

  • While God does warn Cain, he doesn’t control Cain
  • God does not interfere with human free will, even when the choices we make are destructive
  • By the same token God also holds us to account for the choices we make
  • Freedom always comes with responsibility

As Walter Brueggemann writes…

  • “The story would have Cain discover that life with the brother is not lived in a void but in relation to God…
  • …whoever violates the brother must face God”  [10]

9 Then the Lord said to Cain, ‘Where is your brother Abel?’

  • ‘I don’t know,’ he replied. ‘Am I my brother’s keeper?’

 

Cain lies to God – denying any responsibility – he is without remorse

  • God’s response, from verse 10, makes it clear that, yes, we are supposed to be our brother’s (and sister’s) keeper
  • Looking out for each other is part of what it means to be human

 

10 The Lord said, ‘What have you done? Listen! Your brother’s blood cries out to me from the ground. 11 Now you are under a curse and driven from the ground, which opened its mouth to receive your brother’s blood from your hand. 12 When you work the ground, it will no longer yield its crops for you. You will be a restless wanderer on the earth.’

 

Abel’s death affects God – it moves Him

  • God is concerned for justice for Abel, so there is a consequence for Cain
  • But the punishment is not ‘an eye for an eye’ or ‘a life for a life’
  • God does not kill Cain here
  • The punishment is somewhat less than the crime deserves
  • The Sensible Sentencing Trust would not be pleased
  • God shows mercy to Cain as well as to Adam & Eve who would have lost two sons if God had chosen to kill Cain

In a word the punishment is exile

  • This was a punishment the Jewish people were all too familiar with
  • To be exiled is to lose almost everything
  • In exile a person loses their family, their home, their land, their work, their routines and consequently their security
  • The prospect of exile is frightening

From verse 13 Cain’s words reveal what is in his heart

  •  ‘My punishment is more than I can bear…’
  • “Cain responds with self-pity instead of repentance…” [11]
  • He talks about God driving him from the land when in fact it is Cain’s own actions which alienate him

Cain has lost touch with the truth and so he adds to what God has said…

  • ‘…whoever finds me will kill me’
  • This  reveals Cain’s fear
  • He is more afraid of other people than he is of God
  • To fear the Lord is to have an accurate perception of reality – to know in your heart of hearts that God is more powerful than anything else
  • To fear the Lord is to be more concerned with what God thinks than with what other people think
  • ‘Faith in God’ and ‘fear of the Lord’ are two sides of the same coin
  • To fear the Lord is to know Him and to trust Him

Despite the fact that Cain shows no remorse for what he has done and no ‘fear of the Lord’, God (in his remarkable grace) still promises to take care of him

  • God puts a mark on Cain so that no one would kill him
  • We don’t know what that mark was, much less whether some people still carry that mark today, but that’s beside the point
  • The point is: God’s concern for justice (for the innocent) is matched by his grace for sinners

We see God’s grace for Cain throughout Genesis 4

  • Firstly, God tried to persuade Cain to reconcile
  • And when Cain ignored God’s warning and murdered Abel, God showed mercy to Cain
  • God did not take Cain’s life but instead protected him and gave him descendants of his own who made all sorts of advancements in technology and industry

When we reflect on the Bible as a whole we notice that Cain is not the only killer that God extended his grace to

  • Moses, Samson, David and the apostle Paul, to name a few
  • All killers at some point in their life and yet used by God, but not without  being broken, humbled and purified in the process
  • God is gracious in a way that fills us with wonder if we pause long enough to think about it

 

Conclusion:

There is so much violence in our world today – the spirit of Cain seems alive and well

  • But it won’t always be that way
  • Listen to what the prophet Isaiah says about the future
  • A note of hope to finish with…

In the last days…

  • The Lord will judge between the nations and will settle disputes for many peoples. They will beat their swords into ploughshares and their spears into pruning hooks. Nation will not take up sword against nation, nor will they train for war anymore.
  • Come, O house of Jacob, let us walk in the light of the Lord.  [12]

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenian_Genocide

[2] Barnabasaid magazine for March/April 2015, page 8.

[3] Line from the hymn ‘When I Survey the Wondrous Cross’

[4] Matthew 20:13-15

[5] Hebrews 11:4

[6] Refer Walter Brueggemann’s commentary on Genesis, page 62.

[7] From Derek Kidner’s commentary on Genesis, page 74.

[8] From Philip Yancey’s book, ‘Stories for the Soul’, pages 69-73.

[9] Ibid

[10] From Walter Brueggemann’s commentary on Genesis, page 61.

[11] Refer Bruce Waltke’s commentary on Genesis, page 98.

[12] Isaiah 2:4-5

Tawa Baptist

Pain

Scripture: Psalm 38

Title: Pain

Structure:

  • Introduction – handle the jandle
  • Pain
  • Conclusion

Introduction – handle the jandle:

Good morning everyone

  • So this is different – at least I’m wearing the same shirt

There is a saying in kiwi culture: ‘handle the jandle’

  • It basically means something like, ‘man up and take your medicine’
  • Take the suffering and the pain and the punishment that is coming your way whether it is fair or not

For those who don’t know, a jandle is a piece of footwear worn in summer – sometimes called flip flops or thongs, depending on where you come from

  • They are like a cut down version of a sandle and, because they are made out of rubber, were sometimes used by parents for hitting their children across the back of the legs, if the child had done something wrong
  • These days of course it is illegal to hit children but the saying has stuck and now handle the jandle is kiwi idiom for facing something unpleasant

Last Sunday we celebrated Easter, remembering Jesus’ suffering and death on the cross, as well as his resurrection from the dead

  • One of the things that Jesus said to his disciples before he suffered and died was, “If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself, take up his cross and follow me. For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for me will find it…”   [1]

Jesus is basically saying here – if you want to follow me, then you have to handle the jandle

  • You’ve got to be prepared for some pain, discomfort & misunderstanding

Please turn with me to the back of your newsletter where you will find Psalm 38

  • Psalm 38 is the prayer of a man in a great deal of pain – a man who is having to handle the jandle. From verse 1 we read…

Lord, do not rebuke me in your anger or discipline me in your wrath. 2 Your arrows have pierced me, and your hand has come down on me. 3 Because of your wrath there is no health in my body;     there is no soundness in my bones because of my sin. 4 My guilt has overwhelmed me like a burden too heavy to bear.

5 My wounds fester and are loathsome because of my sinful folly. 6 I am bowed down and brought very low; all day long I go about mourning. 7 My back is filled with searing pain; there is no health in my body. 8 I am feeble and utterly crushed; I groan in anguish of heart.

9 All my longings lie open before you, Lord; my sighing is not hidden from you. 10 My heart pounds, my strength fails me; even the light has gone from my eyes. 11 My friends and companions avoid me because of my wounds;

my neighbours stay far away. 12 Those who want to kill me set their traps, those who would harm me talk of my ruin; all day long they scheme and lie.

13 I am like the deaf, who cannot hear, like the mute, who cannot speak; 14 I have become like one who does not hear, whose mouth can offer no reply. 15 Lord, I wait for you; you will answer, Lord my God. 16 For I said, “Do not let them gloat or exalt themselves over me when my feet slip.”

17 For I am about to fall, and my pain is ever with me. 18 I confess my iniquity; I am troubled by my sin. 19 Many have become my enemies without cause;     those who hate me without reason are numerous. 20 Those who repay my good with evil lodge accusations against me,     though I seek only to do what is good.

21 Lord, do not forsake me; do not be far from me, my God. 22 Come quickly to help me, my Lord and my Saviour

May the Lord bless the reading of his word

Pain:

Over the summer holidays I injured my leg – ripped my calf muscles apart by 14 cm’s

  • It was quite painful – not the worst pain I’ve experienced but bad enough to stop me moving freely for about 3 weeks or so

Although my injury wasn’t all that terrible (compared to what some people go through) I had lots of time to think and consider the effects of pain

  • Pain is a universal human experience
  • In Psalm 38, David has quite a bit to say about the subject

Firstly, pain tells us the truth – that something is wrong

  • If we are hurting, whether it is physical or emotional we need to know why
  • Although the doctor couldn’t do anything much to take my pain away it still helped having a diagnosis

In Psalm 38 David’s conscience diagnosed the cause of his pain as punishment from God for something he had done wrong. In verses 2 – 5 we read…

  • Your arrows have pierced me, and your hand has come down on me. Because of your wrath there is no health in my body; there is no soundness in my bones because of my sin. 4 My guilt has overwhelmed me like a burden too heavy to bear. 5 My wounds fester and are loathsome because of my sinful folly.

If we experience the physical pain of illness or injury, and also happen to believe in God, then it is natural to ask ourselves, is this some sort of punishment or correction from God?

  • After all, pain demands an explanation

In my own situation I certainly asked myself what God’s purpose may have been in lessening my enjoyment on holiday

  • I wasn’t aware of any sins that God might be punishing me for
  • So either I had become blind to my sin and God was wanting to get my attention – to show me there was something wrong in my life
  • Or my injury had nothing to do with God – it was simply the consequence of getting older
  • Then again it could be one of those unpleasant experiences which we don’t necessarily deserve (or understand) but which God uses for good

The point is, whenever we suffer loss or pain we look for some kind of meaning to redeem (or at least explain) the situation

  • It was a busy year last year and I was becoming a bit hurried on the inside
  • Perhaps God used the enforced rest to slow me down a bit – perhaps that’s the positive I take from it?
  • I’m not sure, we don’t know what we don’t know

In David’s case though, he certainly was aware of some moral or spiritual failing and considered his illness a punishment from God

  • In verse 18 David says he is troubled by his sin
  • We may not always be as troubled by our sin as we should be
  • We may excuse ourselves by saying, “Everyone else does it so it’s not that bad”, or we might say, “I was just having a bad day” when in fact our ‘bad days’ have become the norm, rather than the exception

Guilt and shame are often dismissed in our time and culture as unhelpful residues of a by-gone era – something from the dark ages

  • But actually the pain of guilt and shame (when these are appropriately placed) is a good thing

Shame is like a concrete median barrier on a highway – it prevents us from crossing over into the wrong lane and causing an accident

  • Society needs people to feel ashamed about crossing certain lines where those things are wrong – like stealing or bullying or whatever

In a similar vein, guilt can also be a good thing, when it is appropriately placed

  • Guilt is like a stone in the shoe of our conscience – it creates the discomfort needed to move us to repentance
  • David handles the jandle of his guilt by confessing his sin to God and changing his ways

Obviously shame & guilt can be misplaced

  • Nothing is gained by making people feel ashamed simply for being alive
  • That would be like putting the median barrier across the road so the traffic smashed into it
  • Likewise once the stone of guilt has been removed from the shoe of our conscience we throw the stone away – no need to hold on to it
  • Much less reason to look for larger stones of guilt to carry around with us

As I’ve already alluded to, not all pain can be explained as punishment from God

  • Job suffered a great deal of pain although he had done nothing to deserve it – and in his pain he demanded an explanation from God but God did not give him one – although he did restore Job in the end
  • Sometimes we don’t know why it hurts – it just does
  • Even though Job didn’t get an explanation he was changed through the experience – he received a new orientation
  • His faith became better able to cope with the mystery of God

Returning to Psalm 38, as well as the mental pain of guilt and the physical pain of ill health David is also conscious of the social pain of isolation

  • Verse 11: My friends and companions avoid me because of my wounds; my neighbours stay far away.
  • People don’t know how to be around pain – it hurts too much to watch others suffer

Pain is a prison – it separates us from the ones we love and it limits our freedom, but it can also protect us

  • In the case of my leg, pain stopped me from moving and forced me to stay still
  • But this staying still protected me – it prevented me from causing any further damage to myself and gave my muscles time to heal

It was interesting to hear Bernie speak a couple of weeks’ ago about her trip to Nepal with the Leprosy Mission

  • I imagine for people with leprosy the prison of pain is different
  • Because they don’t always have feeling in certain parts of their body they don’t have the sensation of physical pain to protect them
  • And because they are often excluded from main stream society they also experience the social pain of isolation
  • It seems they miss out on the upside of pain   Now in saying that ‘pain is a prison’ there comes a point when you need to break out of the prison
  • Rest is helpful to the healing process, at least initially, but eventually we need some physio to get moving again
  • In my situation physio meant stretching & strengthening exercises which were painful at first but which did bring freedom  We might think of Jesus’ words about picking up our cross and following him as a kind of spiritual physio which leads us to freedom
  • We live in a time and place in history when we are anxious to eliminate all pain – we have a prejudice (or a mind set) against suffering
  • But actually the right kind of pain, at the right time and in the right dose is good for the soul
  • Pain purifies our thinking – it keeps us honest, stripping away all illusion
  • Pain wipes the slate of our mind clean
  • If we look at Psalm 38 as a whole we realise that David is totally absorbed with his pain – he can’t think of anything else
  • When you are in deep pain for a long time your mind finds it difficult to entertain any other thoughts

According to legend, St Benedict of Nursia cast himself into a thorn bush while naked, to escape the wily temptation of a woman.

  • Benedict seemed to understand that the pain of picking out thorns for days on end would occupy his thoughts and thus prevent his mind from going down a path he didn’t want it to go

Now I’m not suggesting you throw yourself into a gorse bush every time you get the hot’s for someone

  • I don’t think it is healthy to inflict pain on ourselves
  • But nor is it healthy to numb all our pain – sometimes we need to feel uncomfortable
  • Taking pain is like eating vegetables – we may not enjoy it but, in the right measure, it can be good for us

So far, in looking at Psalm 38, we have explored…

  • The physical pain of ill health
  • The mental pain of guilt
  • And the social pain of isolation
  • Hand in hand with the physical, mental and social, comes emotional pain
  • In verse 8 David writes …I groan in anguish of heart.
  • And in verse 10 …my strength fails me; even the light has gone from my eyes (sounds to me like David is describing the symptoms of grief – that emotional heart ache combined with a loss of energy and enjoyment)
  • Pain is a thief – it robs us of motivation and pleasure

So how does David handle the jandle of emotional pain?

  • Well, by giving expression to it – Pain requires expression
  • In verse 9 David says, All my longings lie open before you, Lord; my sighing is not hidden from you.
  • In other words, David gives voice to his hurt in prayer to God
  • He lets God know what he is feeling and what he wants
  • Jesus did this in the Garden of Gethsemane – the night before his crucifixion and death
  • In that situation Jesus found it necessary to deal with the mental & emotional aspects of his pain before confronting the physical & social
  • He made sure the inside of the cup was clean (in private) before facing the public

We must give voice to our pain – if we don’t it will build up inside us creating a pressure which is impossible to contain – like napalm

  • We might play the glad game in public for the sake of others (so we don’t burden them) but we still need to do our groaning and sighing in private
  • Otherwise some poor unsuspecting soul will wear it
  • Hurt people hurt people

It needs to be said that while giving voice to our pain offers some relief – it is not the whole remedy – God is our healer

  • We need God to make things new again
  • Sometimes God heals quickly but more often than not his healing takes time
  • Even after we have healed though pain leaves a scar on our memory
  • Pain increases our sensitivity so we are more careful in future

If the physical, mental, emotional and social pain is not bad enough, to top it all off, David is also in touch with the pain of being misunderstood and having no response for his enemies – we might call this the pain of injustice

  • ­Whatever sins David may have committed against God he has done nothing against those who are out to get him. From verse 12 David says,
  • Those who want to kill me set their traps, those who would harm me talk of my ruin; all day long they scheme and lie.
  • 13 I am like the deaf, who cannot hear, like the mute, who cannot speak;
  • And in verses 19 & 20: Many are those who… hate me without reason… who slander me when I pursue good.

Here David is the picture of vulnerability

  • David is like the deaf, in the sense that people are saying all sorts of nasty things about him behind his back
  • And because he is not part of the conversation he is like the mute – he has no opportunity to defend himself – he can offer no reply
  • But even if he could, what good would it do?
  • The more we try to defend ourselves the more guilty we seem to others

Conclusion:

I’m not sure what pain you have experienced in your life

  • The physical pain of illness or injury no doubt
  • The emotional pain of loss
  • The mental pain of guilt & regret
  • Or perhaps the social pain of rejection
  • In some ways we develop a higher tolerance for pain as we get older
  • But in other ways it takes us longer to recover
  • Whatever form our pain may take I believe God feels it with us
  • Our pain leaves a scar on God’s memory too

We don’t ‘handle the jandle’ on our own – we handle it in the knowledge that Christ has gone before us

  • In some mysterious way (which words can’t explain) our suffering connects us to Christ and his suffering connects us to God
  • In fact Jesus suffered our pain in our place
  • As the prophet Isaiah writes…

 

He was despised and rejected by mankind,     a man of suffering, and familiar with pain. Like one from whom people hide their faces     he was despised, and we held him in low esteem.

4 Surely he took up our pain and bore our suffering, yet we considered him punished by God, stricken by him, and afflicted. 5 But he was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was on him,

and by his wounds we are healed.

 

 

Let us pray…

Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, thank you for the gift of pain in right measure

  • By your grace use our suffering to bring us closer to you
  • And when we have suffered enough heal our hurt that we would be free of bitterness and fit for heaven. Amen.

[1] Matthew 16:24-25

Tawa Baptist

Seeing Jesus

Scripture:

Mark 8:27-35

Key Idea:

There is a time to hold on and a time to let go

Title:

Seeing Jesus

Structure:

  • Introduction
  • Peter’s confession – Mark 8:27-30
  • Jesus’ prediction – Mark 8:31-33
  • Salvation’s paradox – Mark 8:34-35
  • Conclusion

Introduction:

Today we continue our sermon series looking at some of Jesus’ conversations with his disciple, Simon Peter

Please turn with me to Mark chapter 8, verse 27

–        You can find Mark 8 on page 56 toward the back of your pew Bibles

–        Chapter 8 is a hinge passage in Mark’s gospel

–        In comes in the centre as a turning point in Jesus’ ministry

–        It is also a hinge point for Peter and the disciples as they become aware of who Jesus is, what he came to do and what it all means for them

–        From Mark chapter 8, verse 27, we read…

[Read Mark 8:27-35]

May the Spirit of Christ help us to understand the time for holding on and the time for letting go

Peter’s confession – Mark 8:27-30

William Barclay retells the story of a 4th Century monk by the name of Telemachus [1]

–        Telemachus had determined to leave the world to live all alone in prayer & fasting and through these disciplines to save his soul

–        In his lonely life he sought nothing but contact with God

–        But somehow he felt there was something wrong

One day, as he rose from his knees, it suddenly dawned on him that the life he was living was somewhat selfish

–        He realised that if he was to serve God he must serve people and therefore the desert was no place for a Christian to live

–        The cities may have been full of sin but they were also full of people who needed to know God’s love

So Telemachus left his life of solitude in the desert and set out to the greatest city in the world – the city of Rome

–        He begged his way across land and seas to reach his destination

By this time Rome was officially Christian

–        Telemachus arrived at a time when the Roman General, Stilicho, had gained a mighty victory over the Goths

–        As part of the celebrations there would be gladiatorial games where those captured in battle were forced to fight each other to the death to entertain the Roman populace

The crowd of 80,000 roared with blood lust as the gladiators fought

–        Meanwhile Telemachus found his way into the arena

–        He was appalled at what he saw

–        Men for whom Christ had died were killing each other to amuse a supposedly Christian audience

Still in his monk’s robes, Telemachus, leapt over the barrier and dropped into the fighting pit – standing between two gladiators

–        For a moment they stopped

–        But the crowd shouted, ‘Let the games go on’

–        The gladiators pushed Telemachus aside & again he stood between them

–        The crowd began to hurl stones at him urging the soldiers to kill the old monk, so the captain of the games gave an order, a sword flashed and in moments Telemachus was dead

The arena fell silent – shocked that a holy man had been killed in such a way

–        Suddenly everyone’s eyes were opened and they saw Christ in the man who gave his life to stop the violence

The games ended abruptly that day and never began again

There is a time for holding on and a time for letting go

–        Telemachus let go of his life of solitude but he held on to his vision of Christ

–        Then he let go of his life so that others could get hold of God’s love

This morning’s reading from Mark’s gospel begins with Jesus leading his disciples from Bethsaida to the villages near the city of Caesarea Philippi

–        At the time of Jesus, Caesarea Philippi was a centre of worship for those who believed Caesar was a god

–        Before that the city had been a centre of worship for Pan, the Greek god of nature

–        And before that Caesarea Philippi had been a site where the god Baal was worshiped [2]

Now you would think this was a most unlikely location for Jesus to reveal his true identity and purpose – like hearing God speak to you at a Metallica concert, or in a shopping mall or at an arena during a gladiators’ contest – totally unexpected

–        Caesarea Philippi may have been a city full of sin but it was also a city full of people who needed to know the love of God

–        So in a way it was the most appropriate place for the disciples to learn who Jesus really is

Whales communicate by a technique called echo-location

–        They can’t see all that well under water so they make high pitched sounds measuring how long it takes for the sound to bounce back to them

–        Obviously the longer it takes for the sound to come back the further away the object

It seems to me Jesus uses a bit of echo-location with the disciples on this occasion

–        Jesus doesn’t come straight out with it by saying…

–        “Guess what guys – I’m the Messiah”

–        No – he gently questions the disciples to sound out how far they are from understanding who he really is

–        In an area which is renowned for its worship of false gods Jesus says to his followers, “Who do people say that I am”

–        And they reply, “Some say you are John the Baptist, others say that you are Elijah, while others say that you are one of the prophets.”

This tells us most people didn’t yet perceive who Jesus actually was

–        Yes, they had a vague idea that Jesus was a messenger from God (and this created quite a bit of expectation) but their vision of Jesus was still pretty blurry

So Jesus asks his disciples another echo-location question…

–        “What about you? Who do you say I am?

–        This is more specific – more personal

–        Peter replies, “You are the Messiah”

The word ‘Messiah’ is a Hebrew word which literally means ‘anointed one’

–        The Greek equivalent is ‘Christ’ – also meaning ‘anointed one’

–        In Old Testament times when God wanted to identify someone to be king he would have one of his prophets anoint the chosen one by pouring olive oil on his head

The words ‘Messiah’ and ‘Christ’ are not surnames for Jesus – they are titles

–        You know – like ‘Sir Daryl’ or ‘Baron Brian’ or ‘Dame Letitia’

–        Except the title of ‘Messiah’ carries a far greater status and honour than any other title

–        To call Jesus ‘Messiah’ was like calling him King – a rival to Caesar

–        This title was politically explosive – a treasonable offence

Verse 30 tells us that Jesus ordered his disciples not to tell anyone about him

–        For various reasons the Jews thought the Messiah would be a military leader (like king David) who would completely destroy Israel’s enemies

–        If word got out that Jesus was the Messiah all hell would break lose

–        People would rally alongside Jesus in expectation of a violent overthrow of Rome and much life would be lost for nothing

So Jesus orders his disciples to remain silent about his true identity

–        Jesus didn’t come for genocide – he came for salvation

–        He didn’t come to take life – he came to give life

Jesus’ prediction – Mark 8:30-33

There is a time for holding on and a time for letting go

–        Peter had correctly confessed that Jesus is the Messiah – and the disciples needed to hold on to that

–        But the common misconception that the Messiah would spill his enemies’ blood they needed to let go of

–        The only blood that would be spilled was Jesus’ blood. From verse 31 we read…

 

Then Jesus began to teach his disciples: the Son of Man must suffer much and be rejected by the elders, the chief priests and the teachers of the Law. He will be put to death but three days later will rise to life. Jesus made this very clear to them (Which means he didn’t talk in parables)

 

So Peter took Jesus aside and began to rebuke him but Jesus turned round, looked at his disciples, and rebuked Peter, saying…

–        “Get behind me Satan. Your thoughts don’t come from God but from man”

This is one of the most difficult parts of the gospel to listen to

–        It sounds like such a harsh thing for Jesus to say when Peter is so well intentioned

So what’s actually happening here?

–        Well, the first thing we notice is that Jesus only rebukes Peter after Peter has tried to rebuke him

–        The measure we use for others is the measure God will use for us

–        If we forgive others He will forgive us

–        If we are generous with others He will be generous with us

–        If we rebuke God or try to correct Him, He will rebuke us

The Good News Bible (the one in our pews) translates verse 33 as ‘Get away from me Satan’

–        A more accurate translation has Jesus saying, ‘Get behind me Satan’

–        These are words of grace and truth

–        Jesus is not telling Peter to get lost (as the Good News translation suggests)

–        Jesus is telling Peter to get in behind

  • Stop trying to lead me
  • Stop trying to manage me
  • Stop trying to set the agenda for me

–        ‘Get behind me as my disciple – I need your support not your opposition’

Having said that, we can’t avoid the fact that Jesus compares Peter to Satan

–        Although it sounds harsh it is a fair comparison

–        Just as Satan had tried to divert Jesus from going to the cross by offering a short cut, so too Peter tries to divert Jesus

–        The difference between Peter and the Devil is that Peter wasn’t really aware of what he was doing, whereas Satan was quite intentional

It’s interesting that Jesus follows the phrase ‘Get behind me Satan’ with ‘Your thoughts don’t come from God but from man’

–        The implication is the human race has had its thinking distorted by Satan

–        So Peter was not on his own in wanting Jesus to avoid the cross

–        He was only saying what everyone else was thinking

–        Jesus may have been talking to Peter but he was looking at the other disciples as he spoke

–        They (and we) have all had our thinking distorted by the devil

Recently a movie came out called Gravity – starring Sandra Bullock & George Clooney

–        Set in space Gravity tells the story of one woman, Dr Ryan Stone, who learns that in order to truly live she needs to learn to let go

I’d like to play you a clip from the film now – I think it helps to illustrate what Jesus was saying and how Peter struggled with it…

Play the clip from ‘Gravity’

Chapter 4, start at 29:45 and finish at 32:40 if using VLC Media Player

        

In the scene we just saw Matt Kowalski (played by George Clooney) was the leader of the mission and Dr Ryan Stone (played by Sandra Bullock) was the scientist

–        Dr Stone didn’t want to let go of her mission leader Matt Kowalski

–        In her desperation she started trying to give him orders

–        Her thought was to try & save Kowalski by grabbing hold of the tether between them

–        But Kowalski tells her, ‘…you have to let me go or we will both die’

–        Dr Stone can’t do it – she can’t let go

–        In the end mission commander Kowalski has to unclip the tether himself

This situation reminds me a bit of Jesus and Peter

–        Peter is holding on when he needs to let go

–        Jesus is the mission leader and Peter is hanging by a thread

–        Peter wants to save Jesus (or perhaps he just wants to save his idea of the Messiah) and in his desperation he starts trying to give Jesus orders

–        Jesus knows if he doesn’t go to the cross he can’t save Peter or anyone

–        So it’s like Jesus says to Peter, You have to let me go or we will both die

Salvation’s paradox – Mark 8:34-35

There is a time for holding on and a time for letting go

–        In verse 34 Jesus calls the crowd and his disciples to him saying…

–        If anyone wants to come after me he must forget self, carry his cross and follow me.

Jesus is referring to his own death in this verse – he would literally be crucified as would some of his disciples

–        Most of us are unlikely to ever be crucified but nevertheless there is still a cost to following Jesus

So what does it mean then for us forget self and carry our cross?

Well, forgetting self does not mean neglecting our own physical or mental health

–        It does not mean working 16 hours a day 7 days a week burning ourselves out for the gospel – that’s just poor stewardship

–        As a general rule we do better if we keep life in balance and take care of ourselves so we are able to serve God as a living sacrifice

By the same token carrying your cross does not mean stoically putting up with any sort of suffering or hardship – like when people say of an illness or a difficult relative, ‘It’s just my cross to bear’

–        No – carrying our cross has to do specifically with suffering through our association with Jesus

–        Crucifixion was not only a painful death – it was also a humiliating death

–        Part of the punishment involved carrying the cross bar through the streets as a way publicly shaming the person and destroying their reputation

–        So ‘forget self and carry your cross’, in the context of Mark 8, means forget your reputation for the sake of Christ

–        Be prepared to identify with Jesus even though it makes you look bad in the eyes of others

Jesus’ step dad Joseph (the carpenter) forgot himself

–        Joseph had a good reputation – a reputation as a just man

–        But when God asked him to marry the pregnant Mary he had to forget his reputation

–        He couldn’t afford to worry about what others thought or said about him

–        He had to suck it up and endure being misunderstood

What if we bring this idea of forgetting your reputation into a contemporary NZ context?

–        Well, generally speaking Christians don’t get good press in this country

–        We are sometimes portrayed as a bit backward, a bit homo-phobic, a bit irrelevant, a bit narrow minded and a bit cultish – like the Moonies, something to be avoided

–        Whenever someone asks if they can name me as a referee on their job application I think they are quite brave really

–        I’m not sure it always helps your cause to say you go to church

Having said this we shouldn’t be too quick to develop a persecution complex

–        Christians are not usually targeted for persecution in NZ – we have it a lot easier than Christians in some other countries

–        And, in my experience, once people get to know you properly any reservations they may have had about Christians tend to dissolve – so it is generally worth the risk being up front about our allegiance to Jesus

–        Better for your employer to find out you are Christian before they give you the job than to find out 3 months down the track and then feel like you have been hiding things from them

Anyway, the point is, forgetting self and carrying your cross means forgetting your reputation and being willing to suffer humiliation for the sake of Christ

–        In reality this can hurt because so much in life seems to depend on our reputation

–        Like getting a foot in the door, getting work, getting a promotion, getting friends, getting accepted and getting ahead in life

–        Jesus is saying we need to be prepared to put these things aside if we are going to follow him – because he didn’t come make us look good

I was reading an article in Time magazine recently – this article in fact…

 [Display slide 1]

Time - google-calico-cover-0913

“Can Google solve death?”

–        Internet giant Google have started a subsidiary company called ‘Calico’ which is doing some long range research into finding ways to enable people to live longer

–        Not just finding a cure for diseases like cancer and dementia but trying to find a way to reverse the aging process

–        Sounds like science fiction but I suppose if you have lots of money and time you begin to think seriously about this sort of stuff

–        Now I have no intention of criticising their efforts

–        Who knows – maybe they will stumble upon some remedy which helps to extend the average life expectancy of human beings – good luck to them

As I reflected on the article though it occurred to me that Jesus has already solved death

 [Stop displaying slide 1]

 In verse 35 Jesus says…

–        For whoever wants to save his own life will lose it; but whoever loses his life for me and the gospel will save it.

There is a profound paradox in these words which evades full comprehension

The movie clip we saw earlier sheds some light on the first part of what Jesus says…

–        Whoever wants to save his own life will lose it

–        If Matt Kowalski had tried to save his own life he would have lost it and taken Dr Stone with him

–        He knew it was time for him to let go – even if Dr Stone didn’t

But the story I told earlier about the monk Telemachus provides a better illustration of the paradox, for Telemachus’ story finds its meaning more directly in relation to Jesus’ story

–        Jesus literally lost his life by dying on a cross to make us right with God

–        But in losing his life Jesus saved it – for God raised him from the dead

–        Now all who put their faith in Jesus will share in his resurrection, even though they die

–        Telemachus’ death reminded the crowd that Jesus died for them and for those gladiators who were being killed for their entertainment

–        His death also reminded the people of Jesus’ resurrection – a resurrection that Telemachus shares in, just as he shared in Christ’s sufferings

Conclusion:

At the heart of this idea of losing our life to save it is the lesson all human beings need to learn – the lesson of when to hold on and when to let go

For those of us who are parents – our kids need us to hold on to them when they are young but as they get older we need to learn to let them go

–        Not all at once but gradually

–        If we hold on too tightly for too long it damages the relationship

It’s a similar principle with school and work

–        When we are studying for an exam or working toward an important deadline at work – that’s the time to hold on

–        But once the exam is finished and the deadline has passed – that’s the time to let go

–        Do the work, do the hard yards, but don’t worry about the outcome

There is a time for holding on and a time for letting go

–        Forgiveness requires us to hold on to God’s grace while letting go of our feelings of hurt and guilt

–        Grief is similar to forgiveness – it’s the letting go which is painful

When you are maligned, misunderstood and mistreated because of Christ that is a time to hold on to the hope of heaven – those who share in Christ’s suffering will also share in his glory

–        But when you want something so badly that you would give anything to get it – that’s a time to let go and simply pray, ‘Not my will Father, but your will be done.’

There is a time for holding on and a time for letting go

–        What time is it for you?

Let us pray…

[1] William Barclay, ‘The Gospel of Mark’, pages 208-209.

[2] Ben Witherington, ‘The Gospel of Mark’, page 240.

Tawa Baptist

Cyber Parenting

Cyber Parenting – Raising your kids in an online world by James & Simone Boswell

This is one of the most profound Christian parenting books I have had the pleasure of reading. While the focus is on Cyber Parenting, the biblical worldview of parenting is reaffirmed, strengthen and applied in a practical way to protect and guide our children through not only the technological changes  happening in our world today but also through the demands the secular world makes on the family as a whole.  It reassures parents who feel that they grew up in a different era, that God’s word and rules still apply across the ages.

The authors don’t hold back and give an honest account of the dangers faced by kids and adults in the online environment, be it cyber bullying or sending, receiving and viewing inappropriate content. Protecting your online security is essential and dire consequences can result from being uninformed. For instance, if a site requesting your personal information does not begin with https, the S being key, your personal information on that site is not securely stored and identity theft a risk. Also,  innocently informing friends that you are at a local hotspot or agreeing to allow an app to have access to your location, could mean that your movements are tracked, which in some cases has resulted in cyber bullies ganging up on victims in the physical world or criminals preying on children as they are able to find out their physical locations. Another lesson learned is to be careful when sharing content on line and posting information and pictures, while inappropriate and misinformed actions can be “deleted” so to speak, a record of it never really disappears from the online environment, such is the uptake of information! An innocent mistake could have consequences for their future professional lives and reputations ruined as a result.

Yet the authors reassure us that while dangers exist God has given us the tools to cope as parents and in fact, cyber parenting can become a wonderful tool to train our kids in the way of the Lord. As parents, we protect them by modeling good online behaviour, by being informed and putting measures in place to minimize online threats. While, at the same time, we provide biblical lessons on interactions with others, appropriate online behaviour, protecting your reputation and being a great example of a child of God. Then gradually as they mature and prove themselves, we allow them more freedom to make their own decisions. The key is relationship, whether that means joining in online games as a family,  ” friending” them on Facebook or talking about the issues from a non confrontational standpoint. As the online world tends to marginalize families, it’s all about taking back family time!  I strongly encourage you to read this book, it will be of profound benefit to your family as a whole. God Bless

 

By Laurie Coetsee