John’s Opus

Scripture: Luke 3:1-20

Video Link: https://youtu.be/eeSiWyptiKc

Structure:

  • Introduction
  • John’s timing (darkness & light)
  • John’s baptism (repentance & forgiveness)
  • John’s message (judgement & hope)
  • Conclusion

Introduction:

Good morning everyone.

Can anyone hear tell us what the phrase Magnum Opus means? [Wait]

That’s right, magnum opus is a Latin term which literally means great work. A person’s magnum opus is their greatest work.

The painting of the Mona Lisa is arguably Leonardo da Vinci’s magnum opus. Moby Dick is considered Herman Melville’s magnum opus. Winston Churchill’s leadership during World War Two was his magnum opus.  

And, in the book ‘Charlotte’s Web’, Charlotte (the spider) refers to her egg sac as her magnum opus, the ‘finest thing she has ever made’.

I wonder what your magnum opus is?

Today we continue our series on John the Baptist. Last Sunday we heard about John’s purpose in being born; to prepare for the coming of the Messiah. This morning, we jump forward three decades to that time when John fulfils his purpose. Luke chapter 3 describes John’s magnum opus, his great work. From Luke 3, verses 1-18, we read…

In the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar—when Pontius Pilate was governor of Judea, Herod tetrarch of Galilee, his brother Philip tetrarch of Iturea and Traconitis, and Lysanias tetrarch of Abilene— during the high-priesthood of Annas and Caiaphas, the word of God came to John son of Zechariah in the wilderness. He went into all the country around the Jordan, preaching a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins. As it is written in the book of the words of Isaiah the prophet:

“A voice of one calling in the wilderness, ‘Prepare the way for the Lord, make straight paths for him. Every valley shall be filled in, every mountain and hill made low. The crooked roads shall become straight, the rough ways smooth. And all people will see God’s salvation.’”

John said to the crowds coming out to be baptized by him, “You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the coming wrath? Produce fruit in keeping with repentance. And do not begin to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father.’ For I tell you that out of these stones God can raise up children for Abraham. The axe is already at the root of the trees, and every tree that does not produce good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire.”

10 “What should we do then?” the crowd asked.

11 John answered, “Anyone who has two shirts should share with the one who has none, and anyone who has food should do the same.”

12 Even tax collectors came to be baptized. “Teacher,” they asked, “what should we do?”

13 “Don’t collect any more than you are required to,” he told them.

14 Then some soldiers asked him, “And what should we do?”

He replied, “Don’t extort money and don’t accuse people falsely—be content with your pay.”

15 The people were waiting expectantly and were all wondering in their hearts if John might possibly be the Messiah. 16 John answered them all, “I baptize you with water. But one who is more powerful than I will come, the straps of whose sandals I am not worthy to untie. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire. 17 His winnowing fork is in his hand to clear his threshing floor and to gather the wheat into his barn, but he will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire.” 18 And with many other words John exhorted the people and proclaimed the good news to them.

May the Spirit of Jesus illuminate God’s word for us.

Today’s message highlights three aspects of John’s opus: John’s timing, John’s baptism and John’s message. Let’s begin with the timing of John’s work. 

John’s timing

In cricket, it is a thing of beauty to watch a batsman gracefully drive the ball through the covers with little effort. That’s the power of timing.

Likewise, cooking is all about timing. If you leave your chicken in the pan too long it becomes dry and chewy. Not long enough and you end up with food poisoning. Get the timing right though and the chicken is succulent, delicious.

And when it comes to music, it’s not enough to hit the right notes, one must also be in time with the conductor and the other musicians.  

In the opening verses of Luke 3, the gospel writer goes to some trouble to underline the timing of John’s public ministry. Luke lists all the relevant political and religious leaders at the time the word of the Lord came to John. 

From what we know of these leaders, historically, they were men of darkness. They abused their power and committed acts of gross injustice.

Among other things, the Emperor Tiberius ordered the deportment of all Jews from Rome. The last years of his reign were a time of pure terror. [1]

Pilate, the governor of Judea, ran an administration characterised by bribery, racial insult and frequent executions without trial. Pilate was the one who handed Jesus over to be crucified. [2]

Then there was Herod Antipas, sort of a puppet of Rome, ruling in Galilee. Herod was thoroughly immoral. When John the Baptist told Herod to tidy up his act, Herod threw John in prison.

Even the Jewish high priests, Annas and Caiaphas were rotten. They conspired to have Jesus murdered.

Probably these rulers thought of themselves as stars. But really they were more like the darkness of the night sky. In contrast, John the Baptist is like the moon against the backdrop of this dark time in history. John reflects the divine light of God’s word and he has a strong influence on the people, bringing about a tide of social change.

According to Luke, John is the one Isaiah spoke about when he said: A voice of one calling in the wilderness, prepare the way for the Lord…

Isaiah originally spoke that word, centuries earlier, as a kind of night light to comfort the people of Israel who were sitting in the darkness of exile.

The interesting thing with Isaiah’s prophecy is that, all people will see God’s salvation. So the redemption on offer here isn’t just for Israel, it’s for all people. God’s salvation is universally offered.

John the Baptist came on the scene at just the right time in history, when anticipation of God’s redemption was high and Jesus was about to emerge publicly. John was the bearer of God’s word, identifying Jesus as the true light of the world, God’s Messiah.

John’s baptism

Okay, so John’s timing was God’s timing. What about John’s baptism? 

Well, John was a prophet and prophets usually communicate God’s message in two main ways; through words and through signs.

Sometimes the signs are super natural, like when Moses parted the Red Sea or when Elisha healed Naaman of leprosy. Other times the signs are everyday things, which may appear odd but are invested with a special meaning, like when Jeremiah wept over Jerusalem or when Hosea married a prostitute.

Baptism, immersing people in water, was John’s sign from God to the people.

It was not a miraculous sign, it was something anyone could do, and yet it was both distinctively odd (at that time) and invested with meaning.

Baptism wasn’t really something Jews did. Gentiles, who wanted to convert to Judaism, underwent a ceremonial bath as a kind of ritual cleansing but Jews did not do this because being descended from Abraham was their ticket, or so they thought.

John’s baptism was a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins. In the Bible, forgiveness is not automatic. Forgiveness goes together with repentance. We can’t separate them. Repentance is a change of mind that leads to a change in behaviour.

If you are driving in your car and you take a wrong turn, then repentance is realising your mistake, turning your car around and driving in the right direction. Spiritually speaking, there are two roads you can take in this world. One leads to life and the other leads to destruction. Repentance puts you on the road to life.

Another example of repentance. If you are baking a cake and inadvertently put a cup of salt in the mix, instead of a cup of sugar, then repentance is throwing the cake mix out and starting again using the right ingredients this time. Otherwise you (and everyone else eating the cake) will get a nasty surprise.

Spiritually speaking, we might think of our deeds, in this life, as the ingredients we use to make a cake. We want to make sure our deeds are good because, at the end of the day, we get out what we put in. We eat the deeds we bake.

What are you putting into the mix of your life? The measure you use for others is the measure God will use for you. If you forgive others, God will forgive you. But if you nurse resentment, God will leave you in the prison cell of bitterness. That is what Jesus taught. 

John told his fellow Jews, it’s not enough to claim Abraham as your ancestor, you cannot rely on your parents’ faith; that is no guarantee of salvation. Nor will sacrificing animals save you. You need to repent and believe in God’s Messiah, then you will be forgiven. Being baptised is a public sign of one’s repentance. It shows you are committed to righteous living.  

Baptism involves being immersed in water and so the most obvious symbolism here is cleansing from sin. Not that the water of baptism takes away sin. No. Jesus is the one who takes away our sin. The water is a metaphor or a sign pointing to what Jesus does.

One of the odd things about John’s baptism is that John himself administered it. This was in contrast to the Jewish washing rituals of the day in which the person bathed themselves. So those who went to John for baptism were putting themselves in the hands of God’s representative. This signified their surrender to God’s purpose.[3]

But wait, it gets even weirder. John’s baptism took place in the wilderness, near the Jordan. We would expect a sacred ritual like this to happen in or near the Jerusalem temple. But no, it happens in the wilderness, an untamed and potentially dangerous place, outside the sphere of institutional religion.

The wilderness reminds us of Israel’s exodus from slavery in Egypt and the Jordan is the river Israel crossed when entering the Promised Land.

By coming out into the wilderness to be baptised by John and then returning home, the people were symbolically leaving behind those attitudes and habits that enslaved them and re-entering their everyday life with a new freedom, characterised by righteousness. The journey to the wilderness and back signified a fresh start.

John’s baptism informs Christian baptism. Christian baptism borrows from John’s baptism the imagery of repentance from sin, surrender to God and making a fresh start by following Jesus. For John and for us, baptism is an outward sign of an inward reality.

That being said, John’s baptism is not exactly the same as Jesus’ baptism. John himself made it clear he was not the Christ saying…

I baptize you with water. But one who is more powerful than I will come, the straps of whose sandals I am not worthy to untie. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire.

John’s baptism is like a sign post, pointing to Jesus’ baptism. The Holy Spirit is the one who enables us to repent and grow toward Christlikeness. The Holy Spirit is the primary sign that we belong to Jesus.

John’s pathway to salvation; of repentance, believing in Jesus and being baptised, is still the pattern of Christian conversion for many people today.  

Okay, so in thinking about John’s magnum opus (his greatest work) we’ve considered John’s timing and John’s baptism. What about John’s message?

John’s message

Well, like the prophets before him, John proclaimed a message of judgement and hope. Judgement and hope may seem polar opposites but, in Christian thought, they are one, like a single guitar string held against the fret board of history.

In verse 9, of Luke 3, John says to the crowds…

The axe is already at the root of the trees, and every tree that does not produce good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire.”

And, in verse 17, John employs another image of judgement, saying…

17 His winnowing fork is in his hand to clear his threshing floor and to gather the wheat into his barn, but he will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire.”

This is a poetic way of saying: The Messiah is coming soon to destroy the wicked and save the righteous. But, as scary as it sounds, the coming judgement is actually good news. Because, if you are oppressed by evil men, then removing the evil will make life better for everyone.

Even if you are wicked though, there is still hope for you, provided you stop behaving badly and start practising social justice.   

I’m reading Bono’s autobiography at the moment. As well as being a rock star, Bono has also worked as a social justice activist. Among other things he has lobbied some pretty powerful people to forgive third world debt and provide medicine to fight the AIDS epidemic in developing countries.

In the pursuit of social justice, Bono has had to build relationships with people who hold a different point of view. Bono writes…

The search for common ground starts with a search for higher ground. Even with your opponents. Especially with your opponents. …you don’t have to agree on everything if the one thing you agree on is important enough. [4]  

Now I’m not suggesting that Bono is a modern day John the Baptist. For one thing, Bono doesn’t live on locusts and wild honey. But I do like his idea that ‘the search for common ground starts with a search for higher ground’.

It seems to me that John had little in common with those he was communicating with. Nevertheless, John was uncompromising in his search for higher ground.  

When the people asked what does repentance look like, what should we do? John pointed them to the higher ground of social justice saying: “Anyone who has two shirts should share with the one who has none, and anyone who has food should do the same.”

And when tax collectors and soldiers came, John did not require them to quit their jobs and join a monastery. He basically told them to remain in the world and be fair with people and not abuse their power. We can see the wisdom in this. When tax collectors and soldiers act justly and show restraint, the whole community is better off.

The repentance John had in mind wasn’t just personal, it was also social. Forgiveness without repentance doesn’t help anyone. But when you tie repentance to social justice (as John did) that redeems the soul of the individual and it makes the world a better place, at the same time.    

Weeding out corruption at an interpersonal level was something almost everyone (except the ruling elite) could agree on. By preaching the higher ground of social justice, John helped many to find common ground with Jesus and with each other.

But you are never going to get everyone to agree. John wasn’t able to find common ground with Herod. Sometimes social justice divides people.  

John’s message is still as challenging and relevant for us today as it was 2,000 years ago. Social justice begins with each of us personally. How do we practice right relationships in our homes, our schools, our places of work and our community?     

Conclusion:

This morning we have considered John’s magnum opus, his greatest work. John came onto the scene at just the right time in history, reflecting the light of God’s word in a world darkened by evil leadership.

As part of his work John baptised people. John’s baptism was a tangible sign of repentance for the forgiveness of sins. John’s baptism anticipated Jesus’ baptism with the Holy Spirit.  

John’s preaching (his spoken word) was a message of judgement and hope. The Messiah is coming soon, so get yourself ready by practising social justice. Then you will find some common ground with Jesus and with each other.   

The question remains: Are we ready for Jesus’ return?  

Let us pray now as we prepare our hearts for communion…

Father God, you are the author of salvation. You bend the arc of history toward justice. Forgive us for the times we have failed to act justly or show mercy.
Lord Jesus, we thank you for suffering on our behalf. Thank you for your grace. May you be honoured in the breaking of this bread and the sharing of this cup. Empower us by your Holy Spirit to live out social justice for your glory. Amen.

Questions for discussion or reflection:

What stands out for you in reading this Scripture and/or in listening to the sermon? Why do you think this stood out to you?

  • What is your magnum opus?
  • What is significant about the timing of John’s public ministry? What is significant about the times in which we live?
  • Discuss / reflect on the symbolism of John’s baptism. How is John’s baptism similar to Jesus’ baptism? How is it different?
  • Can you think of a time when God changed your mind and behaviour? What happened? What deeds are you putting into the mix of your life? 
  • Why does John tie repentance to social justice?
  • Are we ready for Jesus’ return? How do we practice social justice in our homes, our schools, our work places and our communities?   

[1] Refer Joel Green’s NICNT on Luke, page 168.

[2] Ibid.

[3] Refer Joel Green’s NICNT on Luke, page 164.

[4] Refer Bono’s book, ‘Surrender’, pages 392-393.

Just Moses

Scripture: Exodus 2:11-22

Title: Just Moses

Structure:

  • Introduction
  • Punitive justice
  • Restorative justice
  • Social justice
  • Conclusion

Introduction:

“Peace without justice is tyranny”  [1]

Please turn with me to Exodus chapter 2, verse 11, page 60, near the beginning of your pew Bibles

  • Today we continue our series on Moses in the book of Exodus
  • I’ve given this morning’s sermon the title ‘Just Moses’
  • Partly because we see Moses on his own quite a bit in this reading
  • But also because, in this passage, Moses realises that the peace Egypt enjoys is a false peace – it is in fact tyranny for it is peace without justice
  • From verse 11 of chapter 2 we read…

 Read Exodus 2:11-22

 

May the Spirit of Jesus illuminate this Scripture for us

In this reading Moses demonstrates three kinds of justice…

  • Punitive justice, restorative justice and social justice

Punitive justice:

Scales of Justice

On the wall here is a picture of a woman (a virgin actually) holding a sword in one hand and set of scales in the other

  • Who can tell me what this symbolises? [Wait]
  • Yes, that’s right – it is a symbol of justice

The virgin woman represents purity and innocence

  • While the scales represent even handedness or fairness – the idea of weighing the evidence equitably so that justice is served
  • But also the idea of making sure the punishment measured out is in balance with the crime committed
  • The sword represents not only the power to punish but also the precision to clearly separate the issues in dispute

 

This image finds resonance with the Bible in a number of respects…

Quite often in the Bible wisdom is personified as a woman

  • And wisdom is what is needed for rulers to exercise justice
  • Hence it is a woman (the symbol of wisdom) holding the scales of justice

The Bible also talks about the importance of using honest scales and in not going overboard with punishment

  • In Matthew’s gospel Jesus indicated that God’s justice fits the crime, when he said…
  • The measure you use for others is the measure God will use for you  [2]

Likewise, in the book of Hebrews, God’s word is described as a double edged sword separating the thoughts and attitudes of the heart, [3] so an accurate and fair judgment can be made

  • And of course, the sword is also a metaphor of punishment
  • In his letter to the Romans, Paul talks about the government having a God given role in executing punitive justice…
  • For he does not bear the sword for nothing. He [the government] is God’s servant, an agent of wrath to bring punishment on the wrong doer.

In Exodus 2 we read how an adult Moses went out to visit his people

  • Moses you will remember had been raised with the royal Egyptian family after Pharaoh’s daughter took him under her wing to protect him
  • Moses’ upbringing had been a relatively privileged one
  • He received the best education available and never wanted for a thing
  • So he wasn’t treated like a slave as his Hebrew kin were
  • And this was probably necessary for God’s purpose
  • To be effective in leading Israel out of slavery Moses needed to think like a freeman – not like a slave

It is quite significant really that Moses sent himself

  • He could have stayed in the comfort of the palace
  • He could have sent a servant to check things out and bring back a report
  • He could have given money
  • But he didn’t – Moses gave himself and that takes courage

This reminds us of Jesus who left heaven and came to earth to give himself

When Moses saw the suffering of his own people

  • And when he saw an Egyptian kill a Hebrew he felt compelled to act
  • In quite a deliberate & premeditated way Moses looked around to see no one was watching & then killed the offender, hiding his body in the sand

Some people are a bit hard on Moses at this point – they say he was an angry young man or that he was impetuous and lacked self-control

  • I don’t think we should be too quick to judge Moses though
  • The text doesn’t actually say Moses was angry – although it is reasonable to infer that he was
  • It takes a lot to kill a man and it is hard to imagine Moses not feeling anything here
  • Whatever he may have felt I don’t think Moses had a problem with anger
  • I think he had a problem with injustice – he had no tolerance for it
  • And that is actually a good thing. As Benjamin Franklin said…

Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are.”

Many of us were brought up with this idea that anger is always bad and we must never get angry because that suggests we are bad

  • And to be fair, anger is bad when it’s misplaced – when we take our rage out on some innocent third party
  • But outrage is not wrong in itself – it can be an appropriate response to injustice
  • If you cut yourself you bleed, if you see injustice you feel angry
  • I think God made us like himself, to be disturbed by injustice
  • So that we will be motivated to do something about it

It appears Moses was affected by the injustice he saw

  • He wanted to restore some balance to the scales of justice
  • So he killed the Egyptian as a punishment
  • We might call this punitive justice – justice which makes things even by taking something away

The Law of Moses would later include elements of punitive justice

  • An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth
  • The idea here is not so much to enforce a punishment as it is to limit the extent of the punishment
  • To ensure that people don’t go overboard in carry out their vengeance

Punitive justice is not ideal in that it takes something away

  • It’s a lose / lose scenario – no one wins
  • ‘An eye for eye will make the whole world blind’ [4] – as they say

Having said that, punitive justice will probably always be necessary, at least until Christ returns

  • It can be a deterrent for many people
  • And it may placate people’s anger for a time
  • But it doesn’t have the power to transform people
  • Punitive justice, by its very nature, influences people by external force
  • Genuine transformation comes from the inside, not from the outside

By killing the Egyptian Moses didn’t really achieve much – there would be plenty more task masters just as brutal to replace the one Moses eliminated

  • And the result for Moses was a loss of freedom
  • Moses was forced into exile and obscurity by his actions

Restorative justice:

Earlier we showed a classic image of justice – a woman carrying balanced scales in one hand and a sword in the other

  • Here’s another image of justice…

Or a couple of images actually

  • One of two people shaking hands
  • And the other of a group of people sitting in a circle talking
  • These are images of restorative justice

The image of a woman carrying scales and a sword is quite impersonal

  • Justice isn’t merely a mechanism – like scales or a sword
  • Nor is it an end in itself
  • Justice is an inter-personal relationship – justice must serve relationship

The next day, after killing the Egyptian, Moses returned and saw two Hebrew men fighting

  • Once again Moses is confronted with an injustice and finds himself unable to resist getting involved – he says to the one in the wrong,
  • “Why are you beating up a fellow Hebrew?”

What we notice here is that Moses takes a different approach from the day before – Moses doesn’t resort to violence, instead he uses his words

  • He tries to restore the relationship by talking about it

Punitive justice takes something away – Restorative justice puts it back

So for example, if someone steals your car and crashes it, then punitive justice takes something away from the offender without giving anything to the victim

  • Neither the offender nor the victim get a say in the matter – it’s lose / lose
  • Restorative justice though, gives the victim a voice and the offender the opportunity to make it right – it’s potentially win / win

On the wall here is a table comparing & contrasting punitive justice & restorative justice…

 

Punitive Justice Restorative Justice [5]

What rule has been broken?

What happened?

Who is to blame?

Who has been affected and how?

What will the punishment be?

What needs to be done to put things right?

There is no redemption in punitive justice but there is opportunity for redemption with restorative justice

The Law of Moses would later include elements of restorative justice

  • Leviticus 6, for example: If anyone cheats his neighbour out of his stuff then he must return what was lost or stolen and add 20% to it

Later Jesus would give strong emphasis to a restorative approach

  • When Peter came to him and asked, ‘Lord, how many times should I forgive my brother? Seven times?’
  • Jesus replied, ‘No, not seven times, but seventy times seven’ – meaning as often as it takes

Moses may have had the right idea in acting as a peace-maker and trying to restore the relationship between the two Hebrew men, but his input wasn’t appreciated

  • The man in the wrong answered, “Who made you our ruler and judge? Are you going to kill me just as you killed that Egyptian?”
  • Moses was only trying to help but he was rejected by his own people
  • I think this would have hurt Moses – it would have left its mark on him

This was Jesus’ experience too

  • When Jesus challenged the religious leaders by asking…
  • Why are you laying heavy burdens on your own people,
  • Why are you beating them up with unnecessary shame & guilt,
  • Why are you making their lives harder?
  • They crucified him

After Moses learned that Pharaoh was trying to have him killed, he fled for his life to the land of Midian

Social justice:

So far we have looked at two different kinds of justice: punitive & restorative

  • God is interested in a third kind also – what we might call social justice

Justice

‘Equality does not mean justice’

  • Giving everyone the same box to stand on doesn’t make it fair because not everyone is the same height
  • The tall guy doesn’t need a box to see over the fence
  • The short guy needs two boxes
  • Distributing resources & opportunities so everyone has what they need to see over the fence is social justice

One day, after running away from Egypt, Moses finds himself sitting by a well when seven young women come along to draw water for their flocks

  • As they do this some other (male) shepherds drive the women away
  • Once again Moses is confronted with an injustice

You’ve probably heard the saying,

  • ‘Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime’
  • Well that’s okay but what if the man doesn’t have fair access to fishing equipment or to the fish pond itself?
  • Then we have a social justice issue

Driving the women away from the well so they couldn’t water their flocks was a social justice issue

  • And as one who can’t stand to see people abusing power Moses takes action to help correct the imbalance
  • This time though he doesn’t use violence or diplomacy
  • He doesn’t try to punish the shepherds nor does he try to restore the broken relationship
  • This time Moses simply waters the flocks for the women

Now there may be some who would say, ‘That’s a poor solution because it doesn’t empower the women to do it themselves – and it reinforces unhelpful stereotypes about women not being able to cope without men’

Well, that’s not how I see it

  • If the goal is to bring about social change, so that women shepherds are allowed fair access to the well for watering their flocks, then the change needs to come from inside the male shepherds
  • I’m talking about changing attitudes and values and mind-sets
  • Internal change comes about by being with someone who embodies that change – experiencing someone who is a living example of the change

Just outside the Wellington railway station there is a statue of Mahatma Ghandi with the quote, “Be the change you want to see in the world

  • I wonder if this is what Moses was aiming for when he watered the women’s flock
  • Yea he was doing it for them – but perhaps he was also making a statement to the other male shepherds
  • Perhaps his act of chivalry would have made them stop and think about their actions so they felt a little ashamed for how they had behaved
  • Maybe next time they would remember Moses’ example and allow the women access to the well – who knows?

What we do know is that Moses found acceptance and a family for his efforts

Whether Moses was able to change attitudes by his example or not the Law of Moses would later include elements of social justice

  • In the book of Numbers (chapter 27) the five daughters of Zelophehad asked for an inheritance in the Promised Land because their father had no sons and Moses granted it to them
  • Social justice you see – giving everyone fair access to the fish pond, giving everyone the means to see over the fence.

Conclusion:

This morning we’ve considered three different kinds of justice…

  • Punitive justice – where people are punished by having something taken away from them
  • Restorative justice – where the loss (and hopefully the relationship) are restored
  • And social justice – where everyone gets fair access to the fish pond, or the watering well

There is a true story which illustrates all of these kinds of justice at once

  • Many of you would have heard it already but it’s worth retelling

Fiorello LaGuardia was mayor of New York City during the worst days of the Great Depression and all of WWII

  • He was a colourful character who used to ride the New York City fire trucks, take entire orphanages to baseball games, and whenever the New York newspapers were on strike, he would go on the radio and read the Sunday funnies to the kids.

One bitterly cold evening in January of 1935, the mayor turned up at a night court that served the poorest ward of the city

  • LaGuardia dismissed the judge for the evening and took over the bench himself
  • Within a few minutes, a tattered old woman was brought before him, charged with stealing a loaf of bread
  • She told LaGuardia that her daughter’s husband had deserted her, her daughter was sick, and her two grandchildren were starving

But the shopkeeper, from whom the bread was stolen, refused to drop the charges

  • “It’s a real bad neighbourhood, your Honour.” the man told the mayor. “She’s got to be punished to teach other people around here a lesson.”

LaGuardia sighed. He turned to the woman and said “I’ve got to punish you. The law makes no exceptions—ten dollars or ten days in jail.”

  • But even as he pronounced sentence, the mayor was already reaching into his pocket. He extracted a bill and tossed it into his famous sombrero saying: “Here is the ten dollar fine which I now remit; and furthermore I am going to fine everyone in this courtroom fifty cents for living in a town where a person has to steal bread so that her grandchildren can eat. Mr. Baliff, collect the fines and give them to the defendant.”

Everyone in the court room gave the mayor a standing ovation [6]

Mayor LaGuardia made sure the requirements of punitive justice were met and at the same time attempted some social justice

  • The woman was also restored in that she now had money in her pocket with which to pay the grocer for the bread she had stolen

There was someone else of course who managed to satisfy the requirements of punitive, restorative and social justice all at once & that was Jesus, on the cross

  • He took our punishment
  • He made it possible for us to be restored to right relationship with God
  • And he provided access for everyone to drink from the well of life
  • For [in Christ] there is no difference between Jew and Gentile – the same Lord is Lord of all and richly blesses all who call on him, for, ‘Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.’ [7]  

[1] Attributed to William Allen White

[2] Matthew 7:1-2

[3] Hebrews 4:12

[4] This is often attributed to Mahatma Ghandi although it is unclear if he actually said it

[5] http://www.restorativeschools.org.nz/restorative-practice

[6] Brennan Manning, The Ragamuffin Gospel, pages 91-2

[7] Romans 10:12